Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205)
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 300vsJaguar XE (X760) 2.0
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonJaguar XE (X760)
2.0
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 300
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.9 s
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Highest torque370 Nm273 lb-ft
- Lightest1,455 kg3,208 lb
- Best power-to-weight168 hp/t126 kW/t5.9 kg/hp
- Largest trunk480 L
- Best overall score66/100
- Best performance score62/100
- Best practicality score74/100
Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0
- Most powerful250 hp186 kW
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.3 L/100 km37.3 mpg US44.8 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions144 g/km
- Best estimated range1,000 km621 mi
- Best economy score90/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 300 | JaguarXE (X760)2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 245hp183kW | 250hp186kW |
| Torque | 370Nm273lb-ft | 365Nm269lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,455kg3,208lb | 1,540kg3,395lb |
| Gross weight | 2,095kg4,619lb | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 59.4s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 64.6s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.9s | 6.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 18.4s Calculated | 19.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.6s Calculated | 6.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK | 6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 8.7L/100 km27mpg US32.5mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 13.9s Calculated | 14.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 168hp/t126kW/t76hp/1000 lb Calculated | 162hp/t121kW/t74hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 254Nm/t170lb-ft/ton Calculated | 237Nm/t159lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 971km603mi Calculated | 1,000km621mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,991cc121cu in | 1,997cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,686mm184in | 4,672mm184in |
| Width | 1,810mm71in | 1,967mm77in |
| Height | 1,442mm57in | 1,425mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,840mm112in | 2,835mm112in |
| Front track | 1,588mm63in | 1,602mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,570mm62in | 1,603mm63in |
| Trunk volume | 480L | 455L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 66L | 63L |
| CO2 emissions | 154g/km | 144g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 300: Power / Torque
- Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 300 | 5,500 rpm | 1,300-4,000 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0 | 5,500 rpm | 1,200-4,500 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 300 | JaguarXE (X760)2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.6 s | 6.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.9 s | 6.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 18.4 s | 19.8 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.3 s | 6.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.3 s | 9.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.8 s | 12.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.9 s | 14.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 175 km/h 109 mph | 171 km/h 106 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 300 | 245 hp 183 kW |
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0 | 250 hp 186 kW |
Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0 has 5 hp more than Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 300.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 300 and Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0: 5 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 300 | 370 Nm 273 lb-ft |
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0 | 365 Nm 269 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 300 | 1,455 kg 3,208 lb |
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0 | 1,540 kg 3,395 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 300 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 300 | 5.9 s |
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0 | 6.3 s |
Although Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0 has more power, Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 300 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 300 and Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0: 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 300 | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK |
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0 | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0 and Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 300: 0.5 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 300 | 168 hp/t 126 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp |
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0 | 162 hp/t 121 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 300 | 971 km 603 mi |
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0 | 1,000 km 621 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 300 | 245 hp 183 kW | 5.9 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0 | 250 hp 186 kW | 6.3 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 300 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 300 |
| 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | ||||||
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0 |
| 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 300 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 300 | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | 5.9 s |
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0 | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK | 6.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 300 | 168 hp/t 126 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK |
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0 | 162 hp/t 121 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 300 | JaguarXE (X760)2.0 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 245 hp 183 kW | 250 hp 186 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 370 Nm 273 lb-ft | 365 Nm 269 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.9 s | 6.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,455 kg 3,208 lb | 1,540 kg 3,395 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 971 km 603 mi | 1,000 km 621 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 154 g/km | 144 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 480 L 17.0 cu ft | 455 L 16.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 168 hp/t 126 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp | 162 hp/t 121 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 300 | Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK | 6.3 L/100 km37.3 mpg US44.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.90 LC100 km | 11.03 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 19.15 LC100 mi | 17.74 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,020 L269 US gal224 UK gal | 945 L250 US gal208 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,785 LC/year | 1,654 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 300
- Has 5 Nm more
- Is 85 kg lighter
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 6 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 25 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Highest CO2 emissions
Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0
- Has 5 hp more
- Uses 0.5 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 29 km (18 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 10 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Most powerful
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























