Volkswagen Jetta V
Car comparison
Volkswagen Jetta V 2.0 TFSIvsJaguar X-type (X400) 3.0 i V6 24V
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonJaguar X-type (X400)
3.0 i V6 24V
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volkswagen Jetta V 2.0 TFSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.2 s
- Fastest top speed233 km/h145 mph
- Highest torque280 Nm207 lb-ft
- Lightest1,526 kg3,364 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.0 L/100 km29.4 mpg US35.3 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption10.8 L/100 km21.8 mpg US26.2 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.3 L/100 km37.3 mpg US44.8 mpg UK
- Best estimated range688 km427 mi
- Largest trunk527 L
- Best economy score85/100
Jaguar X-type (X400) 3.0 i V6 24V
- Most powerful231 hp172 kW
- Best power-to-weight147 hp/t110 kW/t6.8 kg/hp
- Best overall score60/100
- Best performance score52/100
- Best practicality score77/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolkswagenJetta V2.0 TFSI | JaguarX-type (X400)3.0 i V6 24V |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 200hp149kW | 231hp172kW |
| Torque | 280Nm207lb-ft | 279Nm206lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,526kg3,364lb | 1,570kg3,461lb |
| Gross weight | 1,960kg4,321lb | 2,120kg4,674lb |
| Top speed | 233 km/h 145 mph | 229 km/h 142 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 65.6s99% target: 231 km/h / 143 mph Calculated | 65.2s99% target: 227 km/h / 141 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.2s | 7.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 26.7s Calculated | 28.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.9s Calculated | 7.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8L/100 km29.4mpg US35.3mpg UK | 10.5L/100 km22.4mpg US26.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 10.8L/100 km21.8mpg US26.2mpg UK | 15.1L/100 km15.6mpg US18.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK | 7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.1s Calculated | 15.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 131hp/t98kW/t59hp/1000 lb Calculated | 147hp/t110kW/t67hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 183Nm/t123lb-ft/ton Calculated | 178Nm/t119lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 688km427mi Calculated | 581km361mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 2,968cc181cu in |
| Length | 4,554mm179in | 4,672mm184in |
| Width | 1,781mm70in | 1,789mm70in |
| Height | 1,459mm57in | 1,430mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,578mm101in | 2,710mm107in |
| Front track | 1,534mm60in | 1,522mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,512mm60in | 1,537mm61in |
| Trunk volume | 527L | - |
| Max trunk volume | - | 452L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 55L | 61L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volkswagen Jetta V 2.0 TFSI: Power / Torque
- Jaguar X-type (X400) 3.0 i V6 24V: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenJetta V2.0 TFSI | 5,100 rpm | 1,800-5,000 rpm | 5,350 rpm |
| JaguarX-type (X400)3.0 i V6 24V | 6,800 rpm | 3,000 rpm | 7,050 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolkswagenJetta V2.0 TFSI | JaguarX-type (X400)3.0 i V6 24V |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.9 s | 7.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.2 s | 7.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 26.7 s | 28.4 s |
| Top speed | 233 km/h 145 mph | 229 km/h 142 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.8 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.0 s | 10.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.8 s | 13.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.1 s | 15.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 158 km/h 98 mph | 156 km/h 97 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenJetta V2.0 TFSI | 200 hp 149 kW |
| JaguarX-type (X400)3.0 i V6 24V | 231 hp 172 kW |
Jaguar X-type (X400) 3.0 i V6 24V has 31 hp more than Volkswagen Jetta V 2.0 TFSI.
The biggest power difference is between Volkswagen Jetta V 2.0 TFSI and Jaguar X-type (X400) 3.0 i V6 24V: 31 hp (23 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenJetta V2.0 TFSI | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
| JaguarX-type (X400)3.0 i V6 24V | 279 Nm 206 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenJetta V2.0 TFSI | 1,526 kg 3,364 lb |
| JaguarX-type (X400)3.0 i V6 24V | 1,570 kg 3,461 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenJetta V2.0 TFSI | 233 km/h 145 mph |
| JaguarX-type (X400)3.0 i V6 24V | 229 km/h 142 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenJetta V2.0 TFSI | 7.2 s |
| JaguarX-type (X400)3.0 i V6 24V | 7.5 s |
Although Jaguar X-type (X400) 3.0 i V6 24V has more power, Volkswagen Jetta V 2.0 TFSI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen Jetta V 2.0 TFSI and Jaguar X-type (X400) 3.0 i V6 24V: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenJetta V2.0 TFSI | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK |
| JaguarX-type (X400)3.0 i V6 24V | 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volkswagen Jetta V 2.0 TFSI and Jaguar X-type (X400) 3.0 i V6 24V: 2.5 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenJetta V2.0 TFSI | 131 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp |
| JaguarX-type (X400)3.0 i V6 24V | 147 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenJetta V2.0 TFSI | 688 km 427 mi |
| JaguarX-type (X400)3.0 i V6 24V | 581 km 361 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenJetta V2.0 TFSI | 200 hp 149 kW | 7.2 s | 233 km/h 145 mph |
| JaguarX-type (X400)3.0 i V6 24V | 231 hp 172 kW | 7.5 s | 229 km/h 142 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenJetta V2.0 TFSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| JaguarX-type (X400)3.0 i V6 24V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenJetta V2.0 TFSI |
| 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| JaguarX-type (X400)3.0 i V6 24V |
| 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK | ||||||
Volkswagen Jetta V 2.0 TFSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenJetta V2.0 TFSI | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | 7.2 s |
| JaguarX-type (X400)3.0 i V6 24V | 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK | 7.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenJetta V2.0 TFSI | 131 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK |
| JaguarX-type (X400)3.0 i V6 24V | 147 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolkswagenJetta V2.0 TFSI | JaguarX-type (X400)3.0 i V6 24V | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 200 hp 149 kW | 231 hp 172 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | 279 Nm 206 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.2 s | 7.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 233 km/h 145 mph | 229 km/h 142 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,526 kg 3,364 lb | 1,570 kg 3,461 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 688 km 427 mi | 581 km 361 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 527 L 18.6 cu ft | 452 L 16.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 131 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp | 147 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volkswagen Jetta V 2.0 TFSI | Jaguar X-type (X400) 3.0 i V6 24V |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8 L/100 km29.4 mpg US35.3 mpg UK | 10.5 L/100 km22.4 mpg US26.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 14.00 LC100 km | 18.38 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 22.53 LC100 mi | 29.57 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,200 L317 US gal264 UK gal | 1,575 L416 US gal346 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,100 LC/year | 2,756 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volkswagen Jetta V 2.0 TFSI
- Has 1 Nm more
- Is 44 kg lighter
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 4 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 2.5 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 107 km (66 mi) more estimated range
- Has 75 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
Jaguar X-type (X400) 3.0 i V6 24V
- Has 31 hp more
- Has 16 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Most powerful
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























