Volvo V70 II · Facelift 2004
Car comparison
Volvo V70 II · Facelift 2004 2.5TvsJaguar X-Type Estate 3.0 i V6 24V Sport
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonJaguar X-Type Estate
3.0 i V6 24V Sport
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volvo V70 II Facelift 2004 2.5T
- Fastest top speed235 km/h146 mph Unrestricted225 km/h140 mph Restricted
- Highest torque320 Nm236 lb-ft
- Lightest1,595 kg3,516 lb
- Lowest city consumption14.4 L/100 km16.3 mpg US19.6 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK
- Largest trunk485 L
- Best economy score80/100
- Best practicality score83/100
Jaguar X-Type Estate 3.0 i V6 24V Sport
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.2 s
- Most powerful231 hp172 kW
- Best power-to-weight143 hp/t107 kW/t7.0 kg/hp
- Best overall score62/100
- Best performance score52/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.5T | JaguarX-Type Estate3.0 i V6 24V Sport |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 210hp157kW | 231hp172kW |
| Torque | 320Nm236lb-ft | 279Nm206lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,595kg3,516lb | 1,610kg3,549lb |
| Gross weight | 2,130kg4,696lb | 2,080kg4,586lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph Calculated | 232 km/h 144 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 77.7s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated | 69.4s99% target: 230 km/h / 143 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.8s | 7.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 29.8s Calculated | 27.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.4s Calculated | 6.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 10.1L/100 km23.3mpg US28.0mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 14.4L/100 km16.3mpg US19.6mpg UK | 14.9L/100 km15.8mpg US19.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK | 7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.6s Calculated | 15.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 132hp/t98kW/t60hp/1000 lb Calculated | 143hp/t107kW/t65hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 201Nm/t134lb-ft/ton Calculated | 173Nm/t116lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 693km431mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 2,521cc154cu in | 2,968cc181cu in |
| Length | 4,710mm185in | 4,716mm186in |
| Width | 1,804mm71in | 1,789mm70in |
| Height | 1,465mm58in | 1,483mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,755mm108in | 2,710mm107in |
| Front track | 1,551mm61in | 1,522mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,548mm61in | 1,537mm61in |
| Trunk volume | 485L | 445L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,641L | 1,415L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 61L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volvo V70 II Facelift 2004 2.5T: Power / Torque
- Jaguar X-Type Estate 3.0 i V6 24V Sport: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.5T | 5,000 rpm | 1,500-4,500 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
| JaguarX-Type Estate3.0 i V6 24V Sport | 6,800 rpm | 3,000 rpm | 7,050 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.5T | JaguarX-Type Estate3.0 i V6 24V Sport |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.4 s | 6.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.8 s | 7.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 29.8 s | 27.9 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph Likely limited | 232 km/h 144 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.0 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.3 s | 10.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.2 s | 12.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.6 s | 15.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 153 km/h 95 mph | 156 km/h 97 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.5T | 210 hp 157 kW |
| JaguarX-Type Estate3.0 i V6 24V Sport | 231 hp 172 kW |
Jaguar X-Type Estate 3.0 i V6 24V Sport has 21 hp more than Volvo V70 II Facelift 2004 2.5T.
The biggest power difference is between Volvo V70 II Facelift 2004 2.5T and Jaguar X-Type Estate 3.0 i V6 24V Sport: 21 hp (16 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.5T | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
| JaguarX-Type Estate3.0 i V6 24V Sport | 279 Nm 206 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.5T | 1,595 kg 3,516 lb |
| JaguarX-Type Estate3.0 i V6 24V Sport | 1,610 kg 3,549 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.5T | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph |
| JaguarX-Type Estate3.0 i V6 24V Sport | 232 km/h 144 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.5T | 7.8 s |
| JaguarX-Type Estate3.0 i V6 24V Sport | 7.2 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Jaguar X-Type Estate 3.0 i V6 24V Sport and Volvo V70 II Facelift 2004 2.5T: 0.6 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.5T | 132 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp |
| JaguarX-Type Estate3.0 i V6 24V Sport | 143 hp/t 107 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.5T | 210 hp 157 kW | 7.8 s | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph |
| JaguarX-Type Estate3.0 i V6 24V Sport | 231 hp 172 kW | 7.2 s | 232 km/h 144 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.5T |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| JaguarX-Type Estate3.0 i V6 24V Sport |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.5T | JaguarX-Type Estate3.0 i V6 24V Sport | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 210 hp 157 kW | 231 hp 172 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | 279 Nm 206 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.8 s | 7.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph | 232 km/h 144 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,595 kg 3,516 lb | 1,610 kg 3,549 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 693 km 431 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 485 L 17.1 cu ft | 445 L 15.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 132 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp | 143 hp/t 107 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volvo V70 II Facelift 2004 2.5T |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 10.1 L/100 km23.3 mpg US28 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 17.68 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 28.45 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,515 L400 US gal333 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,651 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volvo V70 II Facelift 2004 2.5T
- Has 41 Nm more
- Is 15 kg lighter
- Has 3 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Has 40 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
Jaguar X-Type Estate 3.0 i V6 24V Sport
- Has 21 hp more
- Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 12 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























