Lotus Evora GT
Car comparison
Lotus Evora GT 3.5 V6vsJaguar F-type Coupe · Facelift 2020 5.0 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonJaguar F-type Coupe · Facelift 2020
5.0 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Jaguar F-type Coupe Facelift 2020 5.0 V8
- Most powerful450 hp336 kW
- Highest torque580 Nm428 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption10.6 L/100 km22.2 mpg US26.6 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions244 g/km
- Best estimated range660 km410 mi
- Best performance score81/100
- Best economy score78/100
Lotus Evora GT 3.5 V6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.8 s
- Fastest top speed290 km/h180 mph Unrestricted280 km/h174 mph Restricted
- Lightest1,408 kg3,104 lb
- Best power-to-weight295 hp/t220 kW/t3.4 kg/hp
- Best overall score70/100
- Best practicality score50/100
Specification comparison
| Model | LotusEvora GT3.5 V6 | JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20205.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 416hp310kW | 450hp336kW |
| Torque | 450Nm332lb-ft | 580Nm428lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,408kg3,104lb | 1,660kg3,660lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph Calculated | 285 km/h 177 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 52.4s99% target: 287 km/h / 178 mph Calculated | 63.2s99% target: 282 km/h / 175 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.8s | 4.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 11.6s Calculated | 14.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.6s Calculated | 4.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 11.7L/100 km20.1mpg US24.1mpg UK | 10.6L/100 km22.2mpg US26.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 13.5L/100 km17.4mpg US20.9mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 9.8L/100 km24mpg US28.8mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 11.7s Calculated | 12.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 295hp/t220kW/t134hp/1000 lb Calculated | 271hp/t202kW/t123hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 320Nm/t214lb-ft/ton Calculated | 349Nm/t234lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 470km292mi Calculated | 660km410mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,456cc211cu in | 5,000cc305cu in |
| Length | 4,394mm173in | 4,470mm176in |
| Width | 1,972mm78in | 1,923mm76in |
| Height | 1,223mm48in | 1,311mm52in |
| Wheelbase | - | 2,622mm103in |
| Front track | - | 1,584mm62in |
| Rear track | - | 1,628mm64in |
| Trunk volume | - | 299L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 509L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 55L | 70L |
| CO2 emissions | 273g/km | 244g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Lotus Evora GT 3.5 V6: Power / Torque
- Jaguar F-type Coupe Facelift 2020 5.0 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| LotusEvora GT3.5 V6 | 7,000 rpm | - | 7,250 rpm |
| JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20205.0 V8 | 6,000 rpm | 2,500-5,000 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | LotusEvora GT3.5 V6 | JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20205.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.6 s | 4.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.8 s | 4.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 11.6 s | 14.4 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph Likely limited | 285 km/h 177 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.0 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.1 s | 5.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.7 s | 8.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 9.8 s | 10.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 11.7 s | 12.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 200 km/h 124 mph | 187 km/h 116 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LotusEvora GT3.5 V6 | 416 hp 310 kW |
| JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20205.0 V8 | 450 hp 336 kW |
Jaguar F-type Coupe Facelift 2020 5.0 V8 has 34 hp more than Lotus Evora GT 3.5 V6.
The biggest power difference is between Lotus Evora GT 3.5 V6 and Jaguar F-type Coupe Facelift 2020 5.0 V8: 34 hp (25 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LotusEvora GT3.5 V6 | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft |
| JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20205.0 V8 | 580 Nm 428 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LotusEvora GT3.5 V6 | 1,408 kg 3,104 lb |
| JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20205.0 V8 | 1,660 kg 3,660 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LotusEvora GT3.5 V6 | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph |
| JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20205.0 V8 | 285 km/h 177 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LotusEvora GT3.5 V6 | 3.8 s |
| JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20205.0 V8 | 4.6 s |
Although Jaguar F-type Coupe Facelift 2020 5.0 V8 has more power, Lotus Evora GT 3.5 V6 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Lotus Evora GT 3.5 V6 and Jaguar F-type Coupe Facelift 2020 5.0 V8: 0.8 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LotusEvora GT3.5 V6 | 11.7 L/100 km 20.1 mpg US 24.1 mpg UK |
| JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20205.0 V8 | 10.6 L/100 km 22.2 mpg US 26.6 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Jaguar F-type Coupe Facelift 2020 5.0 V8 and Lotus Evora GT 3.5 V6: 1.1 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LotusEvora GT3.5 V6 | 295 hp/t 220 kW/t 3.4 kg/hp |
| JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20205.0 V8 | 271 hp/t 202 kW/t 3.7 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LotusEvora GT3.5 V6 | 470 km 292 mi |
| JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20205.0 V8 | 660 km 410 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| LotusEvora GT3.5 V6 | 416 hp 310 kW | 3.8 s | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph |
| JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20205.0 V8 | 450 hp 336 kW | 4.6 s | 285 km/h 177 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LotusEvora GT3.5 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20205.0 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LotusEvora GT3.5 V6 |
| 11.7 L/100 km 20.1 mpg US 24.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20205.0 V8 |
| 10.6 L/100 km 22.2 mpg US 26.6 mpg UK | ||||||
Jaguar F-type Coupe Facelift 2020 5.0 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| LotusEvora GT3.5 V6 | 11.7 L/100 km 20.1 mpg US 24.1 mpg UK | 3.8 s |
| JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20205.0 V8 | 10.6 L/100 km 22.2 mpg US 26.6 mpg UK | 4.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| LotusEvora GT3.5 V6 | 295 hp/t 220 kW/t 3.4 kg/hp | 11.7 L/100 km 20.1 mpg US 24.1 mpg UK |
| JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20205.0 V8 | 271 hp/t 202 kW/t 3.7 kg/hp | 10.6 L/100 km 22.2 mpg US 26.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | LotusEvora GT3.5 V6 | JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20205.0 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 416 hp 310 kW | 450 hp 336 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft | 580 Nm 428 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.8 s | 4.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph | 285 km/h 177 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,408 kg 3,104 lb | 1,660 kg 3,660 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 11.7 L/100 km 20.1 mpg US 24.1 mpg UK | 10.6 L/100 km 22.2 mpg US 26.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 470 km 292 mi | 660 km 410 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 273 g/km | 244 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | - | 299 L 10.6 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 295 hp/t 220 kW/t 3.4 kg/hp | 271 hp/t 202 kW/t 3.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Lotus Evora GT 3.5 V6 | Jaguar F-type Coupe Facelift 2020 5.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 11.7 L/100 km20.1 mpg US24.1 mpg UK | 10.6 L/100 km22.2 mpg US26.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 20.47 LC100 km | 18.55 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 32.95 LC100 mi | 29.85 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,755 L464 US gal386 UK gal | 1,590 L420 US gal350 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,071 LC/year | 2,783 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Lotus Evora GT 3.5 V6
- Is 252 kg lighter
- Is 0.8 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Has 24 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Highest CO2 emissions
Jaguar F-type Coupe Facelift 2020 5.0 V8
- Has 34 hp more
- Has 130 Nm more
- Uses 1.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 190 km (118 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 29 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























