Porsche Cayman (981C)
Car comparison
Porsche Cayman (981C) GTS 3.4vsJaguar F-type Coupe 3.0 V6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonJaguar F-type Coupe
3.0 V6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Porsche Cayman (981C) GTS 3.4
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.9 s
- Fastest top speed285 km/h177 mph
- Most powerful340 hp254 kW
- Lightest1,345 kg2,965 lb
- Best power-to-weight253 hp/t189 kW/t4.0 kg/hp
- Largest trunk425 L
- Best overall score62/100
- Best performance score72/100
- Best practicality score42/100
Jaguar F-type Coupe 3.0 V6
- Highest torque450 Nm332 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.4 L/100 km28.0 mpg US33.6 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption11.7 L/100 km20.1 mpg US24.1 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.5 L/100 km36.2 mpg US43.5 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions199 g/km
- Best estimated range833 km518 mi
- Best economy score84/100
Specification comparison
| Model | PorscheCayman (981C)GTS 3.4 | JaguarF-type Coupe3.0 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 340hp254kW | 340hp254kW |
| Torque | 380Nm280lb-ft | 450Nm332lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,345kg2,965lb | 1,577kg3,477lb |
| Gross weight | 1,665kg3,671lb | 2,000kg4,409lb |
| Top speed | 285 km/h 177 mph | Unrestricted 275 km/h171 mph Restricted 260 km/h162 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 66.4s99% target: 282 km/h / 175 mph Calculated | 75.5s99% target: 272 km/h / 169 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.9s | 5.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 15.2s Calculated | 17.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.7s Calculated | 5.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9L/100 km26.1mpg US31.4mpg UK | 8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 12.7L/100 km18.5mpg US22.2mpg UK | 11.7L/100 km20.1mpg US24.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK | 6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.9s Calculated | 13.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 253hp/t189kW/t115hp/1000 lb Calculated | 216hp/t161kW/t98hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 283Nm/t189lb-ft/ton Calculated | 285Nm/t191lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 711km442mi Calculated | 833km518mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,436cc210cu in | 2,995cc183cu in |
| Length | 4,404mm173in | 4,470mm176in |
| Width | 1,801mm71in | 1,923mm76in |
| Height | 1,284mm51in | 1,309mm52in |
| Wheelbase | 2,475mm97in | 2,622mm103in |
| Front track | - | 1,597mm63in |
| Rear track | - | 1,649mm65in |
| Ground clearance | - | 108mm4in |
| Trunk volume | 425L | 315L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 407L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 64L | 70L |
| CO2 emissions | 211g/km | 199g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Porsche Cayman (981C) GTS 3.4: Power / Torque
- Jaguar F-type Coupe 3.0 V6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (981C)GTS 3.4 | 7,400 rpm | 4,750-5,800 rpm | 7,650 rpm |
| JaguarF-type Coupe3.0 V6 | 6,500 rpm | 3,500-5,000 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | PorscheCayman (981C)GTS 3.4 | JaguarF-type Coupe3.0 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.7 s | 5.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.9 s | 5.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 15.2 s | 17.8 s |
| Top speed | 285 km/h 177 mph | Unrestricted 275 km/h171 mph Restricted 260 km/h162 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.7 s | 5.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.5 s | 8.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.9 s | 11.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.9 s | 13.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 184 km/h 114 mph | 175 km/h 109 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (981C)GTS 3.4 | 340 hp 254 kW |
| JaguarF-type Coupe3.0 V6 | 340 hp 254 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (981C)GTS 3.4 | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft |
| JaguarF-type Coupe3.0 V6 | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (981C)GTS 3.4 | 1,345 kg 2,965 lb |
| JaguarF-type Coupe3.0 V6 | 1,577 kg 3,477 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (981C)GTS 3.4 | 285 km/h 177 mph |
| JaguarF-type Coupe3.0 V6 | Unrestricted 275 km/h171 mph Restricted 260 km/h162 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (981C)GTS 3.4 | 4.9 s |
| JaguarF-type Coupe3.0 V6 | 5.3 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Porsche Cayman (981C) GTS 3.4 and Jaguar F-type Coupe 3.0 V6: 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (981C)GTS 3.4 | 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK |
| JaguarF-type Coupe3.0 V6 | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Jaguar F-type Coupe 3.0 V6 and Porsche Cayman (981C) GTS 3.4: 0.6 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (981C)GTS 3.4 | 253 hp/t 189 kW/t 4.0 kg/hp |
| JaguarF-type Coupe3.0 V6 | 216 hp/t 161 kW/t 4.6 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (981C)GTS 3.4 | 711 km 442 mi |
| JaguarF-type Coupe3.0 V6 | 833 km 518 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (981C)GTS 3.4 | 340 hp 254 kW | 4.9 s | 285 km/h 177 mph |
| JaguarF-type Coupe3.0 V6 | 340 hp 254 kW | 5.3 s | Unrestricted 275 km/h171 mph Restricted 260 km/h162 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (981C)GTS 3.4 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| JaguarF-type Coupe3.0 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (981C)GTS 3.4 |
| 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| JaguarF-type Coupe3.0 V6 |
| 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | ||||||
Porsche Cayman (981C) GTS 3.4 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (981C)GTS 3.4 | 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK | 4.9 s |
| JaguarF-type Coupe3.0 V6 | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | 5.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (981C)GTS 3.4 | 253 hp/t 189 kW/t 4.0 kg/hp | 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK |
| JaguarF-type Coupe3.0 V6 | 216 hp/t 161 kW/t 4.6 kg/hp | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | PorscheCayman (981C)GTS 3.4 | JaguarF-type Coupe3.0 V6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 340 hp 254 kW | 340 hp 254 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.9 s | 5.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 285 km/h 177 mph | Unrestricted 275 km/h171 mph Restricted 260 km/h162 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,345 kg 2,965 lb | 1,577 kg 3,477 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 711 km 442 mi | 833 km 518 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 211 g/km | 199 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 425 L 15.0 cu ft | 315 L 11.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 253 hp/t 189 kW/t 4.0 kg/hp | 216 hp/t 161 kW/t 4.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Porsche Cayman (981C) GTS 3.4 | Jaguar F-type Coupe 3.0 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9 L/100 km26.1 mpg US31.4 mpg UK | 8.4 L/100 km28 mpg US33.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 15.75 LC100 km | 14.70 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 25.35 LC100 mi | 23.66 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,350 L357 US gal297 UK gal | 1,260 L333 US gal277 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,363 LC/year | 2,205 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Porsche Cayman (981C) GTS 3.4
- Is 232 kg lighter
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Has 37 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 110 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Highest CO2 emissions
Jaguar F-type Coupe 3.0 V6
- Has 70 Nm more
- Uses 0.6 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 122 km (76 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 12 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























