Porsche 911 (991 II)
Car comparison
Porsche 911 (991 II) Carrera 3.0vsPorsche Cayman (981C) GTS 3.4
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonPorsche Cayman (981C)
GTS 3.4
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Porsche 911 (991 II) Carrera 3.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.6 s
- Fastest top speed295 km/h183 mph
- Most powerful370 hp276 kW
- Highest torque450 Nm332 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight259 hp/t193 kW/t3.9 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.3 L/100 km28.3 mpg US34.0 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption11.7 L/100 km20.1 mpg US24.1 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.3 L/100 km37.3 mpg US44.8 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions190 g/km
- Best estimated range771 km479 mi
- Best overall score65/100
- Best performance score77/100
- Best economy score85/100
Porsche Cayman (981C) GTS 3.4
- Lightest1,345 kg2,965 lb
- Largest trunk425 L
- Best practicality score42/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Porsche911 (991 II)Carrera 3.0 | PorscheCayman (981C)GTS 3.4 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 370hp276kW | 340hp254kW |
| Torque | 450Nm332lb-ft | 380Nm280lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,430kg3,153lb | 1,345kg2,965lb |
| Gross weight | 1,875kg4,134lb | 1,665kg3,671lb |
| Top speed | 295 km/h 183 mph | 285 km/h 177 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 63.9s99% target: 292 km/h / 181 mph Calculated | 66.4s99% target: 282 km/h / 175 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.6s | 4.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 13.8s Calculated | 15.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.4s Calculated | 4.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK | 9L/100 km26.1mpg US31.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 11.7L/100 km20.1mpg US24.1mpg UK | 12.7L/100 km18.5mpg US22.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.5s Calculated | 12.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 259hp/t193kW/t117hp/1000 lb Calculated | 253hp/t189kW/t115hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 315Nm/t211lb-ft/ton Calculated | 283Nm/t189lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 771km479mi Calculated | 711km442mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,981cc182cu in | 3,436cc210cu in |
| Length | 4,499mm177in | 4,404mm173in |
| Width | 1,808mm71in | 1,801mm71in |
| Height | 1,294mm51in | 1,284mm51in |
| Wheelbase | 2,450mm96in | 2,475mm97in |
| Trunk volume | 145L | 425L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 64L | 64L |
| CO2 emissions | 190g/km | 211g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Porsche 911 (991 II) Carrera 3.0: Power / Torque
- Porsche Cayman (981C) GTS 3.4: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 (991 II)Carrera 3.0 | 6,500 rpm | 1,700-5,000 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| PorscheCayman (981C)GTS 3.4 | 7,400 rpm | 4,750-5,800 rpm | 7,650 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Porsche911 (991 II)Carrera 3.0 | PorscheCayman (981C)GTS 3.4 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.4 s | 4.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.6 s | 4.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 13.8 s | 15.2 s |
| Top speed | 295 km/h 183 mph | 285 km/h 177 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.6 s | 5.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.3 s | 8.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.6 s | 10.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.5 s | 12.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 190 km/h 118 mph | 184 km/h 114 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (991 II)Carrera 3.0 | 370 hp 276 kW |
| PorscheCayman (981C)GTS 3.4 | 340 hp 254 kW |
Porsche 911 (991 II) Carrera 3.0 has 30 hp more than Porsche Cayman (981C) GTS 3.4.
The biggest power difference is between Porsche Cayman (981C) GTS 3.4 and Porsche 911 (991 II) Carrera 3.0: 30 hp (22 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (991 II)Carrera 3.0 | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft |
| PorscheCayman (981C)GTS 3.4 | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (991 II)Carrera 3.0 | 1,430 kg 3,153 lb |
| PorscheCayman (981C)GTS 3.4 | 1,345 kg 2,965 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (991 II)Carrera 3.0 | 295 km/h 183 mph |
| PorscheCayman (981C)GTS 3.4 | 285 km/h 177 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (991 II)Carrera 3.0 | 4.6 s |
| PorscheCayman (981C)GTS 3.4 | 4.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Porsche 911 (991 II) Carrera 3.0 and Porsche Cayman (981C) GTS 3.4: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (991 II)Carrera 3.0 | 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK |
| PorscheCayman (981C)GTS 3.4 | 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Porsche 911 (991 II) Carrera 3.0 and Porsche Cayman (981C) GTS 3.4: 0.7 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (991 II)Carrera 3.0 | 259 hp/t 193 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp |
| PorscheCayman (981C)GTS 3.4 | 253 hp/t 189 kW/t 4.0 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (991 II)Carrera 3.0 | 771 km 479 mi |
| PorscheCayman (981C)GTS 3.4 | 711 km 442 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 (991 II)Carrera 3.0 | 370 hp 276 kW | 4.6 s | 295 km/h 183 mph |
| PorscheCayman (981C)GTS 3.4 | 340 hp 254 kW | 4.9 s | 285 km/h 177 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 (991 II)Carrera 3.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| PorscheCayman (981C)GTS 3.4 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 (991 II)Carrera 3.0 |
| 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK | ||||||
| PorscheCayman (981C)GTS 3.4 |
| 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Porsche 911 (991 II) Carrera 3.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 (991 II)Carrera 3.0 | 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK | 4.6 s |
| PorscheCayman (981C)GTS 3.4 | 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK | 4.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 (991 II)Carrera 3.0 | 259 hp/t 193 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp | 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK |
| PorscheCayman (981C)GTS 3.4 | 253 hp/t 189 kW/t 4.0 kg/hp | 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Porsche911 (991 II)Carrera 3.0 | PorscheCayman (981C)GTS 3.4 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 370 hp 276 kW | 340 hp 254 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.6 s | 4.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 295 km/h 183 mph | 285 km/h 177 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,430 kg 3,153 lb | 1,345 kg 2,965 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK | 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 771 km 479 mi | 711 km 442 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 190 g/km | 211 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 145 L 5.1 cu ft | 425 L 15.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 259 hp/t 193 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp | 253 hp/t 189 kW/t 4.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Porsche 911 (991 II) Carrera 3.0 | Porsche Cayman (981C) GTS 3.4 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.3 L/100 km28.3 mpg US34 mpg UK | 9 L/100 km26.1 mpg US31.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 14.53 LC100 km | 15.75 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 23.38 LC100 mi | 25.35 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,245 L329 US gal274 UK gal | 1,350 L357 US gal297 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,179 LC/year | 2,363 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Porsche 911 (991 II) Carrera 3.0
- Has 30 hp more
- Has 70 Nm more
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.7 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 6 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 60 km (37 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 21 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Porsche Cayman (981C) GTS 3.4
- Is 85 kg lighter
- Has 280 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Lightest
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























