Jaguar F-type Coupe · Facelift 2020
Car comparison
Jaguar F-type Coupe · Facelift 2020 2.0vsVolkswagen Teramont X 2.5T V6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolkswagen Teramont X
2.5T V6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Jaguar F-type Coupe Facelift 2020 2.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.7 s
- Fastest top speed265 km/h165 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful300 hp224 kW
- Lightest1,520 kg3,351 lb
- Best power-to-weight197 hp/t147 kW/t5.1 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.1 L/100 km29.0 mpg US34.9 mpg UK
- Best estimated range778 km483 mi
- Best performance score66/100
- Best economy score85/100
Volkswagen Teramont X 2.5T V6
- Highest torque500 Nm369 lb-ft
- Largest trunk509 L
- Best overall score61/100
- Best practicality score72/100
Specification comparison
| Model | JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20202.0 | VolkswagenTeramont X2.5T V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 300hp224kW | 299hp223kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 500Nm369lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,520kg3,351lb | 2,130kg4,696lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 78.0s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated | 94.9s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.7s | 7.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 19.9s Calculated | 46.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.4s Calculated | 6.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK | 9.8L/100 km24mpg US28.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 12.8L/100 km18.4mpg US22.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.8s Calculated | 15.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 197hp/t147kW/t90hp/1000 lb Calculated | 140hp/t105kW/t64hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 263Nm/t176lb-ft/ton Calculated | 235Nm/t157lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 778km483mi Calculated | 714km444mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,997cc122cu in | 2,492cc152cu in |
| Length | 4,470mm176in | 4,905mm193in |
| Width | 1,923mm76in | 1,989mm78in |
| Height | 1,311mm52in | 1,719mm68in |
| Wheelbase | 2,622mm103in | 2,980mm117in |
| Front track | 1,596mm63in | - |
| Rear track | 1,647mm65in | - |
| Trunk volume | 299L | 509L |
| Max trunk volume | 509L | 1,719L |
| Doors | 2 | 5 |
| Seats | 2 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 63L | 70L |
| CO2 emissions | 184g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Jaguar F-type Coupe Facelift 2020 2.0: Power / Torque
- Volkswagen Teramont X 2.5T V6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20202.0 | 5,500 rpm | 1,500-4,500 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| VolkswagenTeramont X2.5T V6 | 6,000 rpm | 2,750-3,500 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20202.0 | VolkswagenTeramont X2.5T V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.4 s | 6.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.7 s | 7.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 19.9 s | 46.8 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.0 s | 6.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.1 s | 9.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.6 s | 12.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.8 s | 15.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 170 km/h 105 mph | 145 km/h 90 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20202.0 | 300 hp 224 kW |
| VolkswagenTeramont X2.5T V6 | 299 hp 223 kW |
Jaguar F-type Coupe Facelift 2020 2.0 has 1 hp more than Volkswagen Teramont X 2.5T V6.
The biggest power difference is between Volkswagen Teramont X 2.5T V6 and Jaguar F-type Coupe Facelift 2020 2.0: 1 hp (1 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20202.0 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| VolkswagenTeramont X2.5T V6 | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20202.0 | 1,520 kg 3,351 lb |
| VolkswagenTeramont X2.5T V6 | 2,130 kg 4,696 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20202.0 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| VolkswagenTeramont X2.5T V6 | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20202.0 | 5.7 s |
| VolkswagenTeramont X2.5T V6 | 7.2 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Jaguar F-type Coupe Facelift 2020 2.0 and Volkswagen Teramont X 2.5T V6: 1.5 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20202.0 | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenTeramont X2.5T V6 | 9.8 L/100 km 24.0 mpg US 28.8 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Jaguar F-type Coupe Facelift 2020 2.0 and Volkswagen Teramont X 2.5T V6: 1.7 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20202.0 | 197 hp/t 147 kW/t 5.1 kg/hp |
| VolkswagenTeramont X2.5T V6 | 140 hp/t 105 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20202.0 | 778 km 483 mi |
| VolkswagenTeramont X2.5T V6 | 714 km 444 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20202.0 | 300 hp 224 kW | 5.7 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| VolkswagenTeramont X2.5T V6 | 299 hp 223 kW | 7.2 s | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20202.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolkswagenTeramont X2.5T V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20202.0 |
| 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolkswagenTeramont X2.5T V6 |
| 9.8 L/100 km 24.0 mpg US 28.8 mpg UK | ||||||
Jaguar F-type Coupe Facelift 2020 2.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20202.0 | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK | 5.7 s |
| VolkswagenTeramont X2.5T V6 | 9.8 L/100 km 24.0 mpg US 28.8 mpg UK | 7.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20202.0 | 197 hp/t 147 kW/t 5.1 kg/hp | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenTeramont X2.5T V6 | 140 hp/t 105 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp | 9.8 L/100 km 24.0 mpg US 28.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20202.0 | VolkswagenTeramont X2.5T V6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 300 hp 224 kW | 299 hp 223 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.7 s | 7.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,520 kg 3,351 lb | 2,130 kg 4,696 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK | 9.8 L/100 km 24.0 mpg US 28.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 778 km 483 mi | 714 km 444 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 184 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 299 L 10.6 cu ft | 509 L 18.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 197 hp/t 147 kW/t 5.1 kg/hp | 140 hp/t 105 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Jaguar F-type Coupe Facelift 2020 2.0 | Volkswagen Teramont X 2.5T V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.1 L/100 km29 mpg US34.9 mpg UK | 9.8 L/100 km24 mpg US28.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 14.17 LC100 km | 17.15 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 22.81 LC100 mi | 27.60 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,215 L321 US gal267 UK gal | 1,470 L388 US gal323 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,126 LC/year | 2,573 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Jaguar F-type Coupe Facelift 2020 2.0
- Has 1 hp more
- Is 610 kg lighter
- Is 1.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 50 km/h (31 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.7 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 57 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 63 km (39 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Smallest trunk
Volkswagen Teramont X 2.5T V6
- Has 100 Nm more
- Has 210 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























