Jaguar F-Pace
Car comparison
Jaguar F-Pace 25tvsLexus NX I (AZ10) · Facelift 2017 300
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonLexus NX I (AZ10) · Facelift 2017
300
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Jaguar F-Pace 25t
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.0 s
- Fastest top speed217 km/h135 mph
- Most powerful250 hp186 kW
- Highest torque365 Nm269 lb-ft
- Lightest1,831 kg4,037 lb
- Best power-to-weight137 hp/t102 kW/t7.3 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption9.4 L/100 km25.0 mpg US30.1 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.7 L/100 km35.1 mpg US42.2 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,065 km662 mi
- Best overall score65/100
- Best performance score53/100
- Best economy score86/100
- Best practicality score89/100
Specification comparison
| Model | JaguarF-Pace25t | LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 250hp186kW | 238hp177kW |
| Torque | 365Nm269lb-ft | 350Nm258lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,831kg4,037lb | 1,837kg4,050lb |
| Gross weight | 2,460kg5,423lb | 2,359kg5,201lb |
| Top speed | 217 km/h 135 mph | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 79.0s99% target: 215 km/h / 133 mph Calculated | 74.4s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.0s | 7.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 38.7s Calculated | 45.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.6s Calculated | 6.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK | 9.8L/100 km24mpg US28.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 9.4L/100 km25mpg US30.1mpg UK | 10.7L/100 km22mpg US26.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK | 8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.1s Calculated | 15.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 137hp/t102kW/t62hp/1000 lb Calculated | 130hp/t97kW/t59hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 199Nm/t133lb-ft/ton Calculated | 191Nm/t127lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,065km662mi Calculated | 612km380mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,997cc122cu in | 1,998cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,731mm186in | 4,638mm183in |
| Width | 2,071mm82in | 1,869mm74in |
| Height | 1,666mm66in | 1,646mm65in |
| Wheelbase | 2,874mm113in | 2,659mm105in |
| Front track | 1,641mm65in | - |
| Rear track | 1,654mm65in | - |
| Ground clearance | 215mm8in | 175mm7in |
| Trunk volume | - | 501L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 82L | 60L |
| CO2 emissions | 175g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Jaguar F-Pace 25t: Power / Torque
- Lexus NX I (AZ10) Facelift 2017 300: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarF-Pace25t | 5,500 rpm | 1,300-4,500 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300 | 4,800-5,600 rpm | 1,650-4,000 rpm | 5,850 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | JaguarF-Pace25t | LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.6 s | 6.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.0 s | 7.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 38.7 s | 45.5 s |
| Top speed | 217 km/h 135 mph | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.4 s | 6.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.7 s | 9.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.6 s | 12.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.1 s | 15.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 149 km/h 93 mph | 148 km/h 92 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-Pace25t | 250 hp 186 kW |
| LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300 | 238 hp 177 kW |
Jaguar F-Pace 25t has 12 hp more than Lexus NX I (AZ10) Facelift 2017 300.
The biggest power difference is between Lexus NX I (AZ10) Facelift 2017 300 and Jaguar F-Pace 25t: 12 hp (9 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-Pace25t | 365 Nm 269 lb-ft |
| LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300 | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-Pace25t | 1,831 kg 4,037 lb |
| LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300 | 1,837 kg 4,050 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-Pace25t | 217 km/h 135 mph |
| LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300 | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-Pace25t | 7.0 s |
| LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300 | 7.2 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Jaguar F-Pace 25t and Lexus NX I (AZ10) Facelift 2017 300: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-Pace25t | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK |
| LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300 | 9.8 L/100 km 24.0 mpg US 28.8 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Jaguar F-Pace 25t and Lexus NX I (AZ10) Facelift 2017 300: 2.1 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-Pace25t | 137 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp |
| LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300 | 130 hp/t 97 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-Pace25t | 1,065 km 662 mi |
| LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300 | 612 km 380 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarF-Pace25t | 250 hp 186 kW | 7.0 s | 217 km/h 135 mph |
| LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300 | 238 hp 177 kW | 7.2 s | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarF-Pace25t |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarF-Pace25t |
| 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300 |
| 9.8 L/100 km 24.0 mpg US 28.8 mpg UK | ||||||
Jaguar F-Pace 25t is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarF-Pace25t | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | 7.0 s |
| LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300 | 9.8 L/100 km 24.0 mpg US 28.8 mpg UK | 7.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarF-Pace25t | 137 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK |
| LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300 | 130 hp/t 97 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp | 9.8 L/100 km 24.0 mpg US 28.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | JaguarF-Pace25t | LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 250 hp 186 kW | 238 hp 177 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 365 Nm 269 lb-ft | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.0 s | 7.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 217 km/h 135 mph | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,831 kg 4,037 lb | 1,837 kg 4,050 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | 9.8 L/100 km 24.0 mpg US 28.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,065 km 662 mi | 612 km 380 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 175 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | - | 501 L 17.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 137 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | 130 hp/t 97 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Jaguar F-Pace 25t | Lexus NX I (AZ10) Facelift 2017 300 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK | 9.8 L/100 km24 mpg US28.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 13.48 LC100 km | 17.15 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 21.69 LC100 mi | 27.60 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,155 L305 US gal254 UK gal | 1,470 L388 US gal323 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,021 LC/year | 2,573 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Jaguar F-Pace 25t
- Has 12 hp more
- Has 15 Nm more
- Is 6 kg lighter
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 7 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 2.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 7 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 453 km (281 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Lexus NX I (AZ10) Facelift 2017 300
No measurable advantages in the available data.
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























