Land Rover Discovery Sport · Facelift 2019
Car comparison
Land Rover Discovery Sport · Facelift 2019 2.0 P250vsJaguar F-Pace 25d
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonJaguar F-Pace
25d
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Jaguar F-Pace 25d
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.2 s
- Highest torque500 Nm369 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.5 L/100 km36.2 mpg US43.5 mpg UK
- Best estimated range923 km574 mi
- Best overall score65/100
- Best performance score54/100
- Best economy score89/100
Land Rover Discovery Sport Facelift 2019 2.0 P250
- Fastest top speed225 km/h140 mph
- Most powerful250 hp186 kW
- Lightest1,864 kg4,109 lb
- Best power-to-weight134 hp/t100 kW/t7.5 kg/hp
- Best practicality score92/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 P250 | JaguarF-Pace25d |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 250hp186kW | 240hp179kW |
| Torque | 365Nm269lb-ft | 500Nm369lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,864kg4,109lb | 1,881kg4,147lb |
| Gross weight | 2,550kg5,622lb | 2,470kg5,445lb |
| Top speed | 225 km/h 140 mph | 217 km/h 135 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 98.4s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph Calculated | 83.2s99% target: 215 km/h / 133 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.8s | 7.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 39.6s Calculated | 40.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.4s Calculated | 6.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8L/100 km29.4mpg US35.3mpg UK | 6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.6s Calculated | 15.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 134hp/t100kW/t61hp/1000 lb Calculated | 128hp/t95kW/t58hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 196Nm/t131lb-ft/ton Calculated | 266Nm/t178lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 838km520mi Calculated | 923km574mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,997cc122cu in | 1,999cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,597mm181in | 4,731mm186in |
| Width | 2,069mm81in | 2,071mm82in |
| Height | 1,727mm68in | 1,666mm66in |
| Wheelbase | 2,741mm108in | 2,874mm113in |
| Front track | 1,636mm64in | 1,641mm65in |
| Rear track | 1,643mm65in | 1,654mm65in |
| Ground clearance | 212mm8in | 215mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 1,179L | - |
| Max trunk volume | 1,794L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 67L | 60L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 171g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Land Rover Discovery Sport Facelift 2019 2.0 P250: Power / Torque
- Jaguar F-Pace 25d: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 P250 | 5,500 rpm | 1,400-4,500 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| JaguarF-Pace25d | 4,000 rpm | 1,500-2,500 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 P250 | JaguarF-Pace25d |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.4 s | 6.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.8 s | 7.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 39.6 s | 40.4 s |
| Top speed | 225 km/h 140 mph | 217 km/h 135 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.7 s | 6.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.1 s | 9.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.1 s | 12.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.6 s | 15.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 145 km/h 90 mph | 148 km/h 92 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 P250 | 250 hp 186 kW |
| JaguarF-Pace25d | 240 hp 179 kW |
Land Rover Discovery Sport Facelift 2019 2.0 P250 has 10 hp more than Jaguar F-Pace 25d.
The biggest power difference is between Jaguar F-Pace 25d and Land Rover Discovery Sport Facelift 2019 2.0 P250: 10 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 P250 | 365 Nm 269 lb-ft |
| JaguarF-Pace25d | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 P250 | 1,864 kg 4,109 lb |
| JaguarF-Pace25d | 1,881 kg 4,147 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 P250 | 225 km/h 140 mph |
| JaguarF-Pace25d | 217 km/h 135 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 P250 | 7.8 s |
| JaguarF-Pace25d | 7.2 s |
Although Land Rover Discovery Sport Facelift 2019 2.0 P250 has more power, Jaguar F-Pace 25d is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Jaguar F-Pace 25d and Land Rover Discovery Sport Facelift 2019 2.0 P250: 0.6 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 P250 | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK |
| JaguarF-Pace25d | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Jaguar F-Pace 25d and Land Rover Discovery Sport Facelift 2019 2.0 P250: 1.5 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 P250 | 134 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp |
| JaguarF-Pace25d | 128 hp/t 95 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 P250 | 838 km 520 mi |
| JaguarF-Pace25d | 923 km 574 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 P250 | 250 hp 186 kW | 7.8 s | 225 km/h 140 mph |
| JaguarF-Pace25d | 240 hp 179 kW | 7.2 s | 217 km/h 135 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 P250 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| JaguarF-Pace25d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 P250 |
| 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| JaguarF-Pace25d |
| 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK | ||||||
Jaguar F-Pace 25d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 P250 | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | 7.8 s |
| JaguarF-Pace25d | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK | 7.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 P250 | 134 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK |
| JaguarF-Pace25d | 128 hp/t 95 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 P250 | JaguarF-Pace25d | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 250 hp 186 kW | 240 hp 179 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 365 Nm 269 lb-ft | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.8 s | 7.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 225 km/h 140 mph | 217 km/h 135 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,864 kg 4,109 lb | 1,881 kg 4,147 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 838 km 520 mi | 923 km 574 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 171 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 1,179 L 41.6 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 134 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp | 128 hp/t 95 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Land Rover Discovery Sport Facelift 2019 2.0 P250 | Jaguar F-Pace 25d |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8 L/100 km29.4 mpg US35.3 mpg UK | 6.5 L/100 km36.2 mpg US43.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 14.00 LC100 km | 11.38 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 22.53 LC100 mi | 18.31 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,200 L317 US gal264 UK gal | 975 L258 US gal214 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,100 LC/year | 1,706 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Land Rover Discovery Sport Facelift 2019 2.0 P250
- Has 10 hp more
- Is 17 kg lighter
- Has 8 km/h (5 mph) higher top speed
- Has 7 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
Jaguar F-Pace 25d
- Has 135 Nm more
- Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 1.5 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 86 km (53 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























