Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) · Facelift 2017
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) · Facelift 2017 GLA 220dvsJaguar F-Pace 2.0d
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonJaguar F-Pace
2.0d
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) Facelift 2017 GLA 220d
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.7 s
- Fastest top speed223 km/h139 mph
- Lightest1,465 kg3,230 lb
- Best power-to-weight121 hp/t90 kW/t8.3 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.4 L/100 km53.5 mpg US64.2 mpg UK
- Best overall score60/100
- Best performance score50/100
- Best economy score95/100
Jaguar F-Pace 2.0d
- Most powerful180 hp134 kW
- Highest torque430 Nm317 lb-ft
- Best estimated range1,176 km731 mi
- Largest trunk650 L
- Best practicality score90/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 220d | JaguarF-Pace2.0d |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 177hp132kW | 180hp134kW |
| Torque | 350Nm258lb-ft | 430Nm317lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,465kg3,230lb | 1,720kg3,792lb |
| Gross weight | 2,035kg4,486lb | - |
| Top speed | 223 km/h 139 mph | 208 km/h 129 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 77.3s99% target: 221 km/h / 137 mph Calculated | 95.0s99% target: 206 km/h / 128 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.7s | 8.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 34.9s Calculated | 61.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.3s Calculated | 8.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 4.4L/100 km53.5mpg US64.2mpg UK | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 3.9L/100 km60.3mpg US72.4mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 15.6s Calculated | 16.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 121hp/t90kW/t55hp/1000 lb Calculated | 105hp/t78kW/t47hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 239Nm/t160lb-ft/ton Calculated | 250Nm/t167lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,136km706mi Calculated | 1,176km731mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,143cc131cu in | 1,999cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,424mm174in | 4,746mm187in |
| Width | 1,804mm71in | 2,070mm81in |
| Height | 1,494mm59in | 1,667mm66in |
| Wheelbase | 2,699mm106in | 2,874mm113in |
| Front track | 1,569mm62in | 1,641mm65in |
| Rear track | 1,560mm61in | 1,654mm65in |
| Ground clearance | - | 213mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 421L | 650L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,235L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 50L | 60L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 134g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) Facelift 2017 GLA 220d: Power / Torque
- Jaguar F-Pace 2.0d: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 220d | 3,600-3,800 rpm | 1,400-3,400 rpm | 4,050 rpm |
| JaguarF-Pace2.0d | 4,000 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 220d | JaguarF-Pace2.0d |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.3 s | 8.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.7 s | 8.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 34.9 s | 61.9 s |
| Top speed | 223 km/h 139 mph | 208 km/h 129 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.8 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.2 s | 10.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.1 s | 13.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.6 s | 16.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 150 km/h 93 mph | 139 km/h 86 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 220d | 177 hp 132 kW |
| JaguarF-Pace2.0d | 180 hp 134 kW |
Jaguar F-Pace 2.0d has 3 hp more than Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) Facelift 2017 GLA 220d.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) Facelift 2017 GLA 220d and Jaguar F-Pace 2.0d: 3 hp (2 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 220d | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
| JaguarF-Pace2.0d | 430 Nm 317 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 220d | 1,465 kg 3,230 lb |
| JaguarF-Pace2.0d | 1,720 kg 3,792 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 220d | 223 km/h 139 mph |
| JaguarF-Pace2.0d | 208 km/h 129 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 220d | 7.7 s |
| JaguarF-Pace2.0d | 8.5 s |
Although Jaguar F-Pace 2.0d has more power, Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) Facelift 2017 GLA 220d is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) Facelift 2017 GLA 220d and Jaguar F-Pace 2.0d: 0.8 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 220d | 4.4 L/100 km 53.5 mpg US 64.2 mpg UK |
| JaguarF-Pace2.0d | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) Facelift 2017 GLA 220d and Jaguar F-Pace 2.0d: 0.7 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 220d | 121 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp |
| JaguarF-Pace2.0d | 105 hp/t 78 kW/t 9.6 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 220d | 1,136 km 706 mi |
| JaguarF-Pace2.0d | 1,176 km 731 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 220d | 177 hp 132 kW | 7.7 s | 223 km/h 139 mph |
| JaguarF-Pace2.0d | 180 hp 134 kW | 8.5 s | 208 km/h 129 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 220d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| JaguarF-Pace2.0d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 220d |
| 4.4 L/100 km 53.5 mpg US 64.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| JaguarF-Pace2.0d |
| 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) Facelift 2017 GLA 220d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 220d | 4.4 L/100 km 53.5 mpg US 64.2 mpg UK | 7.7 s |
| JaguarF-Pace2.0d | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK | 8.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 220d | 121 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp | 4.4 L/100 km 53.5 mpg US 64.2 mpg UK |
| JaguarF-Pace2.0d | 105 hp/t 78 kW/t 9.6 kg/hp | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 220d | JaguarF-Pace2.0d | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 177 hp 132 kW | 180 hp 134 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | 430 Nm 317 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.7 s | 8.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 223 km/h 139 mph | 208 km/h 129 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,465 kg 3,230 lb | 1,720 kg 3,792 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 4.4 L/100 km 53.5 mpg US 64.2 mpg UK | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,136 km 706 mi | 1,176 km 731 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 134 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 421 L 14.9 cu ft | 650 L 23.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 121 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp | 105 hp/t 78 kW/t 9.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) Facelift 2017 GLA 220d | Jaguar F-Pace 2.0d |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 4.4 L/100 km53.5 mpg US64.2 mpg UK | 5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 7.70 LC100 km | 8.92 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 12.39 LC100 mi | 14.36 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 660 L174 US gal145 UK gal | 765 L202 US gal168 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,155 LC/year | 1,339 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) Facelift 2017 GLA 220d
- Is 255 kg lighter
- Is 0.8 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 15 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.7 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 16 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Jaguar F-Pace 2.0d
- Has 3 hp more
- Has 80 Nm more
- Has 40 km (25 mi) more estimated range
- Has 229 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























