Car comparison

Jaguar F-Pace 20dvsMazda CX-30 2.0 Skyactiv-X

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Jaguar F-Pace

20d

180 hp1999 ccDieselRWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2019-2020
VS

Mazda CX-30

2.0 Skyactiv-X

180 hp1998 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticNaturally aspiratedSUV2019-2021

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Jaguar F-Pace 20d

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    8.6 s
  • Fastest top speed
    208 km/h
    129 mph
  • Most powerful
    180 hp
    134 kW
  • Highest torque
    430 Nm
    317 lb-ft
  • Lowest highway consumption
    5.1 L/100 km
    46.1 mpg US
    55.4 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    1,053 km
    654 mi
  • Best overall score
    59/100
  • Best performance score
    45/100
  • Best practicality score
    89/100

Mazda CX-30 2.0 Skyactiv-X

  • Lightest
    1,556 kg
    3,430 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    116 hp/t
    86 kW/t
    8.6 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    5.6 L/100 km
    42.0 mpg US
    50.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    6.6 L/100 km
    35.6 mpg US
    42.8 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    128 g/km
  • Best economy score
    92/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelJaguarF-Pace20dMazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X
Power
180hp134kW
180hp134kW
Torque
430Nm317lb-ft
224Nm165lb-ft
Curb weight
1,790kg3,946lb
1,556kg3,430lb
Gross weight
2,380kg5,247lb
2,070kg4,564lb
Top speed
208 km/h
129 mph
204 km/h
127 mph
To 99% top speed
97.3s99% target: 206 km/h / 128 mph
Calculated
84.0s99% target: 202 km/h / 125 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
8.6s
9.2s
0-200 km/h
63.3s
Calculated
70.0s
Calculated
0-60 mph
8.1s
Calculated
8.7s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK
5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK
6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK
5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK
Quarter mile
16.2s
Calculated
16.7s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
101hp/t75kW/t46hp/1000 lb
Calculated
116hp/t86kW/t52hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
240Nm/t161lb-ft/ton
Calculated
144Nm/t96lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,053km654mi
Calculated
857km533mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,999cc122cu in
1,998cc122cu in
Length
4,731mm186in
4,395mm173in
Width
2,071mm82in
1,795mm71in
Height
1,666mm66in
1,540mm61in
Wheelbase
2,874mm113in
2,655mm105in
Front track
1,641mm65in
1,565mm62in
Rear track
1,654mm65in
1,565mm62in
Ground clearance
215mm8in
175mm7in
Trunk volume-
430L
Max trunk volume-
1,406L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
60L
48L
CO2 emissions
150g/km
128g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Jaguar F-Pace 20dMazda CX-30 2.0 Skyactiv-XPowerTorque
  • Jaguar F-Pace 20d: Power / Torque
  • Mazda CX-30 2.0 Skyactiv-X: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
JaguarF-Pace20d4,000 rpm1,750-2,500 rpm4,250 rpm
MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X6,000 rpm3,000 rpm6,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricJaguarF-Pace20dMazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
8.1 s
8.7 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
8.6 s
9.2 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
63.3 s
70.0 s
Top speed
208 km/h
129 mph
204 km/h
127 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.8 s
330 ft
101 m
6.9 s
7.3 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.5 s
10.9 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.6 s
14.0 s
1/4 mile
402 m
16.2 s
16.7 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
138 km/h
86 mph
138 km/h
86 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarF-Pace20d
180 hp
134 kW
MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X
180 hp
134 kW

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarF-Pace20d
430 Nm
317 lb-ft
MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X
224 Nm
165 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarF-Pace20d
1,790 kg
3,946 lb
MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X
1,556 kg
3,430 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarF-Pace20d
208 km/h
129 mph
MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X
204 km/h
127 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarF-Pace20d8.6 s
MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X9.2 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Jaguar F-Pace 20d and Mazda CX-30 2.0 Skyactiv-X: 0.6 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarF-Pace20d
5.7 L/100 km
41.3 mpg US
49.6 mpg UK
MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X
5.6 L/100 km
42.0 mpg US
50.4 mpg UK

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarF-Pace20d
101 hp/t
75 kW/t
9.9 kg/hp
MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X
116 hp/t
86 kW/t
8.6 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarF-Pace20d
1,053 km
654 mi
MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X
857 km
533 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
JaguarF-Pace20d
180 hp
134 kW
8.6 s
208 km/h
129 mph
MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X
180 hp
134 kW
9.2 s
204 km/h
127 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
JaguarF-Pace20d
Power
180 hp
134 kW
0-100 km/h8.6 s
Top speed
208 km/h
129 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,731 mm
186.3 in
Height
1,666 mm
65.6 in
MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X
Power
180 hp
134 kW
0-100 km/h9.2 s
Top speed
204 km/h
127 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
430 L
15.2 cu ft
Length
4,395 mm
173.0 in
Height
1,540 mm
60.6 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
JaguarF-Pace20d
Power
180 hp
134 kW
0-100 km/h8.6 s
Top speed
208 km/h
129 mph
5.7 L/100 km
41.3 mpg US
49.6 mpg UK
MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X
Power
180 hp
134 kW
0-100 km/h9.2 s
Top speed
204 km/h
127 mph
5.6 L/100 km
42.0 mpg US
50.4 mpg UK

Jaguar F-Pace 20d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
JaguarF-Pace20d
5.7 L/100 km
41.3 mpg US
49.6 mpg UK
8.6 s
MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X
5.6 L/100 km
42.0 mpg US
50.4 mpg UK
9.2 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
JaguarF-Pace20d
101 hp/t
75 kW/t
9.9 kg/hp
5.7 L/100 km
41.3 mpg US
49.6 mpg UK
MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X
116 hp/t
86 kW/t
8.6 kg/hp
5.6 L/100 km
42.0 mpg US
50.4 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleJaguarF-Pace20dMazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X
Power
180 hp
134 kW
180 hp
134 kW
Torque
430 Nm
317 lb-ft
224 Nm
165 lb-ft
Acceleration
8.6 s
9.2 s
Top speed
208 km/h
129 mph
204 km/h
127 mph
Lightness
1,790 kg
3,946 lb
1,556 kg
3,430 lb
Fuel consumption
5.7 L/100 km
41.3 mpg US
49.6 mpg UK
5.6 L/100 km
42.0 mpg US
50.4 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,731 mm
186.3 in
Height
1,666 mm
65.6 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
430 L
15.2 cu ft
Length
4,395 mm
173.0 in
Height
1,540 mm
60.6 in
Range score
1,053 km
654 mi
857 km
533 mi
CO2 score
150 g/km
128 g/km
Trunk score
-
430 L
15.2 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
101 hp/t
75 kW/t
9.9 kg/hp
116 hp/t
86 kW/t
8.6 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleJaguar F-Pace 20dMazda CX-30 2.0 Skyactiv-X
Consumption5.7 L/100 km41.3 mpg US49.6 mpg UK5.6 L/100 km42 mpg US50.4 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km9.98 LC100 km9.80 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi16.05 LC100 mi15.77 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used855 L226 US gal188 UK gal840 L222 US gal185 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,496 LC/year1,470 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Jaguar F-Pace 20d

  • Has 206 Nm more
  • Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 4 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 195 km (121 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Mazda CX-30 2.0 Skyactiv-X

  • Is 234 kg lighter
  • Uses 0.1 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 15 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Emits 22 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Jaguar F-Pace 20d
Mazda CX-30 2.0 Skyactiv-X
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

20d
2.0d
VS
JaguarF-Pace20dvsJaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0d
2.0 Skyactiv-X
2.2d
VS
MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-XvsMazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d
20d
2.0 P200
VS
JaguarF-Pace20dvsJaguarE-Pace2.0 P200
2.0 Skyactiv-X
3.3 e-Skyactiv D
VS
MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-XvsMazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
20d
2.0i
VS
JaguarF-Pace20dvsJaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0i
2.0 Skyactiv-X
2.0 SKYACTIV-G
VS
MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-XvsMazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-G
20d
2.0 D4
VS
JaguarF-Pace20dvsVolvoXC60 II2.0 D4
2.0 Skyactiv-X
2.0i
VS
MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-XvsMazdaCX-32.0i
20d
2.0 Skyactiv-X
VS
JaguarF-Pace20dvsMazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X
2.0 Skyactiv-X
330TSI
VS
MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-XvsVolkswagenTayron I330TSI
2.0 Skyactiv-X
20d
VS
MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-XvsJaguarF-Pace20d
20d
2.0 TSI
VS
JaguarF-Pace20dvsSeatTarraco2.0 TSI
Jaguar F-Pace 20d vs Mazda CX-30 2.0 Skyactiv-X - car comparison - FastVsFaster