Car comparison

Skoda Kodiaq I 2.0 TSIvsJaguar F-Pace · Facelift 2020 2.0d

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Skoda Kodiaq I

2.0 TSI

190 hp1984 ccGasolineAWDDual-clutchTurbochargedSUV2019-2021
VS

Jaguar F-Pace · Facelift 2020

2.0d

204 hp1997 ccDieselAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2020-present

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Jaguar F-Pace Facelift 2020 2.0d

  • Most powerful
    204 hp
    152 kW
  • Highest torque
    430 Nm
    317 lb-ft
  • Best power-to-weight
    105 hp/t
    78 kW/t
    9.6 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    6.7 L/100 km
    35.1 mpg US
    42.2 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    896 km
    556 mi
  • Largest trunk
    755 L
  • Best overall score
    62/100
  • Best performance score
    48/100
  • Best economy score
    89/100
  • Best practicality score
    92/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelSkodaKodiaq I2.0 TSIJaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0d
Power
190hp142kW
204hp152kW
Torque
320Nm236lb-ft
430Nm317lb-ft
Curb weight
1,843kg4,063lb
1,951kg4,301lb
Gross weight
2,320kg5,115lb
-
Top speed
211 km/h
131 mph
210 km/h
130 mph
To 99% top speed
82.8s99% target: 209 km/h / 130 mph
Calculated
86.5s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.5s
8.0s
0-200 km/h
48.2s
Calculated
52.4s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.1s
Calculated
7.5s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK
6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
8.7L/100 km27mpg US32.5mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption highway
5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK
-
Quarter mile
15.5s
Calculated
15.8s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
103hp/t77kW/t47hp/1000 lb
Calculated
105hp/t78kW/t47hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
174Nm/t116lb-ft/ton
Calculated
220Nm/t147lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
870km540mi
Calculated
896km556mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,984cc121cu in
1,997cc122cu in
Length
4,697mm185in
4,747mm187in
Width
1,882mm74in
-
Height
1,660mm65in
1,664mm66in
Wheelbase
2,791mm110in
2,874mm113in
Front track
1,586mm62in
1,640mm65in
Rear track
1,576mm62in
1,656mm65in
Ground clearance
191mm8in
213mm8in
Trunk volume
650L
755L
Max trunk volume
2,065L
1,804L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
60L
60L
CO2 emissions
159g/km
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Skoda Kodiaq I 2.0 TSIJaguar F-Pace Facelift 2020 2.0dPowerTorque
  • Skoda Kodiaq I 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
  • Jaguar F-Pace Facelift 2020 2.0d: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TSI4,200-6,000 rpm1,500-4,100 rpm6,250 rpm
JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0d4,250 rpm1,750-2,500 rpm4,500 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricSkodaKodiaq I2.0 TSIJaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0d
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.1 s
7.5 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.5 s
8.0 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
48.2 s
52.4 s
Top speed
211 km/h
131 mph
210 km/h
130 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.4 s
2.5 s
330 ft
101 m
6.6 s
6.7 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.0 s
10.2 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.0 s
13.3 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.5 s
15.8 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
145 km/h
90 mph
142 km/h
89 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TSI
190 hp
142 kW
JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0d
204 hp
152 kW

Jaguar F-Pace Facelift 2020 2.0d has 14 hp more than Skoda Kodiaq I 2.0 TSI.

The biggest power difference is between Skoda Kodiaq I 2.0 TSI and Jaguar F-Pace Facelift 2020 2.0d: 14 hp (10 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TSI
320 Nm
236 lb-ft
JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0d
430 Nm
317 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TSI
1,843 kg
4,063 lb
JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0d
1,951 kg
4,301 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TSI
211 km/h
131 mph
JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0d
210 km/h
130 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TSI7.5 s
JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0d8.0 s

Although Jaguar F-Pace Facelift 2020 2.0d has more power, Skoda Kodiaq I 2.0 TSI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Skoda Kodiaq I 2.0 TSI and Jaguar F-Pace Facelift 2020 2.0d: 0.5 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TSI
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK
JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0d
6.7 L/100 km
35.1 mpg US
42.2 mpg UK

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TSI
103 hp/t
77 kW/t
9.7 kg/hp
JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0d
105 hp/t
78 kW/t
9.6 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TSI
870 km
540 mi
JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0d
896 km
556 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TSI
190 hp
142 kW
7.5 s
211 km/h
131 mph
JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0d
204 hp
152 kW
8.0 s
210 km/h
130 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TSI
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.5 s
Top speed
211 km/h
131 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
650 L
23.0 cu ft
Length
4,697 mm
184.9 in
Height
1,660 mm
65.4 in
JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0d
Power
204 hp
152 kW
0-100 km/h8.0 s
Top speed
210 km/h
130 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
755 L
26.7 cu ft
Length
4,747 mm
186.9 in
Height
1,664 mm
65.5 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TSI
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.5 s
Top speed
211 km/h
131 mph
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK
JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0d
Power
204 hp
152 kW
0-100 km/h8.0 s
Top speed
210 km/h
130 mph
6.7 L/100 km
35.1 mpg US
42.2 mpg UK

Jaguar F-Pace Facelift 2020 2.0d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TSI
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK
7.5 s
JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0d
6.7 L/100 km
35.1 mpg US
42.2 mpg UK
8.0 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TSI
103 hp/t
77 kW/t
9.7 kg/hp
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK
JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0d
105 hp/t
78 kW/t
9.6 kg/hp
6.7 L/100 km
35.1 mpg US
42.2 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleSkodaKodiaq I2.0 TSIJaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0d
Power
190 hp
142 kW
204 hp
152 kW
Torque
320 Nm
236 lb-ft
430 Nm
317 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.5 s
8.0 s
Top speed
211 km/h
131 mph
210 km/h
130 mph
Lightness
1,843 kg
4,063 lb
1,951 kg
4,301 lb
Fuel consumption
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK
6.7 L/100 km
35.1 mpg US
42.2 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
650 L
23.0 cu ft
Length
4,697 mm
184.9 in
Height
1,660 mm
65.4 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
755 L
26.7 cu ft
Length
4,747 mm
186.9 in
Height
1,664 mm
65.5 in
Range score
870 km
540 mi
896 km
556 mi
CO2 score
159 g/km
-
Trunk score
650 L
23.0 cu ft
755 L
26.7 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
103 hp/t
77 kW/t
9.7 kg/hp
105 hp/t
78 kW/t
9.6 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleSkoda Kodiaq I 2.0 TSIJaguar F-Pace Facelift 2020 2.0d
Consumption6.9 L/100 km34.1 mpg US40.9 mpg UK6.7 L/100 km35.1 mpg US42.2 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km12.08 LC100 km11.73 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi19.43 LC100 mi18.87 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,035 L273 US gal228 UK gal1,005 L265 US gal221 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,811 LC/year1,759 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Skoda Kodiaq I 2.0 TSI

  • Is 108 kg lighter
  • Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 1 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Lightest

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Smallest trunk

Jaguar F-Pace Facelift 2020 2.0d

  • Has 14 hp more
  • Has 110 Nm more
  • Uses 0.2 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 1 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 26 km (16 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 105 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Skoda Kodiaq I 2.0 TSI
Jaguar F-Pace 2.0d
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 TSI
2.2 JTDM
VS
SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TSIvsAlfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM
2.0d
20d
VS
JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0dvsJaguarF-Pace20d
2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TSIvsVolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI
2.0d
2.0 P200
VS
JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0dvsJaguarE-Pace2.0 P200
2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TSIvsSeatTarraco2.0 TSI
2.0d
2.0i
VS
JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0dvsJaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0i
2.0 TSI
40 TDI
VS
SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TSIvsAUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI
2.0d
2.0 B4
VS
JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0dvsVolvoXC60 II2.0 B4
2.0 TSI
330TSI
VS
SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TSIvsVolkswagenTayron I330TSI
2.0d
2.5
VS
JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0dvsToyotaRAV4 V2.5
2.0 TSI
20d
VS
SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TSIvsBMWX2 (F39)20d
2.0 TSI
2.0 D4
VS
SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TSIvsVolvoXC402.0 D4
Skoda Kodiaq I 2.0 TSI vs Jaguar F-Pace · Facelift 2020 2.0d - car comparison - FastVsFaster