Car comparison

Jaguar F-Pace 2.0dvsVolvo XC60 II 2.0 D4

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Jaguar F-Pace

2.0d

180 hp1999 ccDieselAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2015-2018
VS

Volvo XC60 II

2.0 D4

190 hp1969 ccDieselFWDManualTurbochargedSUV2017-2018

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Jaguar F-Pace 2.0d

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    8.7 s
  • Fastest top speed
    208 km/h
    129 mph
  • Highest torque
    430 Nm
    317 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,775 kg
    3,913 lb
  • Lowest highway consumption
    4.7 L/100 km
    50.0 mpg US
    60.1 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    1,132 km
    703 mi
  • Largest trunk
    650 L
  • Best overall score
    59/100
  • Best performance score
    45/100
  • Best economy score
    93/100
  • Best practicality score
    90/100

Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4

  • Most powerful
    190 hp
    142 kW
  • Best power-to-weight
    103 hp/t
    77 kW/t
    9.7 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    5.1 L/100 km
    46.1 mpg US
    55.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    5.9 L/100 km
    39.9 mpg US
    47.9 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    135 g/km

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelJaguarF-Pace2.0dVolvoXC60 II2.0 D4
Power
180hp134kW
190hp142kW
Torque
430Nm317lb-ft
400Nm295lb-ft
Curb weight
1,775kg3,913lb
1,846kg4,070lb
Gross weight
2,460kg5,423lb
2,370kg5,225lb
Top speed
208 km/h
129 mph
205 km/h
127 mph
To 99% top speed
97.6s99% target: 206 km/h / 128 mph
Calculated
90.5s99% target: 203 km/h / 126 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
8.7s
8.8s
0-200 km/h
63.6s
Calculated
69.8s
Calculated
0-60 mph
8.2s
Calculated
8.3s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK
5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK
5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
4.7L/100 km50mpg US60.1mpg UK
4.7L/100 km50mpg US60.1mpg UK
Quarter mile
16.3s
Calculated
16.4s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
101hp/t76kW/t46hp/1000 lb
Calculated
103hp/t77kW/t47hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
242Nm/t162lb-ft/ton
Calculated
217Nm/t145lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,132km703mi
Calculated
1,078km670mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,999cc122cu in
1,969cc120cu in
Length
4,731mm186in
4,688mm185in
Width
2,070mm81in
1,902mm75in
Height
1,652mm65in
1,658mm65in
Wheelbase
2,874mm113in
2,865mm113in
Front track
1,641mm65in
-
Rear track
1,654mm65in
-
Ground clearance
213mm8in
216mm9in
Trunk volume
650L
505L
Max trunk volume-
1,432L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
60L
55L
CO2 emissions
139g/km
135g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Jaguar F-Pace 2.0dVolvo XC60 II 2.0 D4PowerTorque
  • Jaguar F-Pace 2.0d: Power / Torque
  • Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
JaguarF-Pace2.0d4,000 rpm1,750-2,500 rpm4,250 rpm
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D44,250 rpm1,750-2,500 rpm4,500 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricJaguarF-Pace2.0dVolvoXC60 II2.0 D4
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
8.2 s
8.3 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
8.7 s
8.8 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
63.6 s
69.8 s
Top speed
208 km/h
129 mph
205 km/h
127 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.6 s
330 ft
101 m
6.9 s
7.0 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.5 s
10.6 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.7 s
13.8 s
1/4 mile
402 m
16.3 s
16.4 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
138 km/h
86 mph
138 km/h
86 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarF-Pace2.0d
180 hp
134 kW
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4
190 hp
142 kW

Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4 has 10 hp more than Jaguar F-Pace 2.0d.

The biggest power difference is between Jaguar F-Pace 2.0d and Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4: 10 hp (7 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarF-Pace2.0d
430 Nm
317 lb-ft
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4
400 Nm
295 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarF-Pace2.0d
1,775 kg
3,913 lb
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4
1,846 kg
4,070 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarF-Pace2.0d
208 km/h
129 mph
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4
205 km/h
127 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarF-Pace2.0d8.7 s
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D48.8 s

Although Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4 has more power, Jaguar F-Pace 2.0d is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Jaguar F-Pace 2.0d and Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4: 0.1 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarF-Pace2.0d
5.3 L/100 km
44.4 mpg US
53.3 mpg UK
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4
5.1 L/100 km
46.1 mpg US
55.4 mpg UK

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarF-Pace2.0d
101 hp/t
76 kW/t
9.9 kg/hp
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4
103 hp/t
77 kW/t
9.7 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarF-Pace2.0d
1,132 km
703 mi
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4
1,078 km
670 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
JaguarF-Pace2.0d
180 hp
134 kW
8.7 s
208 km/h
129 mph
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4
190 hp
142 kW
8.8 s
205 km/h
127 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
JaguarF-Pace2.0d
Power
180 hp
134 kW
0-100 km/h8.7 s
Top speed
208 km/h
129 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
650 L
23.0 cu ft
Length
4,731 mm
186.3 in
Height
1,652 mm
65.0 in
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h8.8 s
Top speed
205 km/h
127 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Length
4,688 mm
184.6 in
Height
1,658 mm
65.3 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
JaguarF-Pace2.0d
Power
180 hp
134 kW
0-100 km/h8.7 s
Top speed
208 km/h
129 mph
5.3 L/100 km
44.4 mpg US
53.3 mpg UK
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h8.8 s
Top speed
205 km/h
127 mph
5.1 L/100 km
46.1 mpg US
55.4 mpg UK

Jaguar F-Pace 2.0d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
JaguarF-Pace2.0d
5.3 L/100 km
44.4 mpg US
53.3 mpg UK
8.7 s
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4
5.1 L/100 km
46.1 mpg US
55.4 mpg UK
8.8 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
JaguarF-Pace2.0d
101 hp/t
76 kW/t
9.9 kg/hp
5.3 L/100 km
44.4 mpg US
53.3 mpg UK
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4
103 hp/t
77 kW/t
9.7 kg/hp
5.1 L/100 km
46.1 mpg US
55.4 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleJaguarF-Pace2.0dVolvoXC60 II2.0 D4
Power
180 hp
134 kW
190 hp
142 kW
Torque
430 Nm
317 lb-ft
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
Acceleration
8.7 s
8.8 s
Top speed
208 km/h
129 mph
205 km/h
127 mph
Lightness
1,775 kg
3,913 lb
1,846 kg
4,070 lb
Fuel consumption
5.3 L/100 km
44.4 mpg US
53.3 mpg UK
5.1 L/100 km
46.1 mpg US
55.4 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
650 L
23.0 cu ft
Length
4,731 mm
186.3 in
Height
1,652 mm
65.0 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Length
4,688 mm
184.6 in
Height
1,658 mm
65.3 in
Range score
1,132 km
703 mi
1,078 km
670 mi
CO2 score
139 g/km
135 g/km
Trunk score
650 L
23.0 cu ft
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
101 hp/t
76 kW/t
9.9 kg/hp
103 hp/t
77 kW/t
9.7 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleJaguar F-Pace 2.0dVolvo XC60 II 2.0 D4
Consumption5.3 L/100 km44.4 mpg US53.3 mpg UK5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km9.28 LC100 km8.92 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi14.93 LC100 mi14.36 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used795 L210 US gal175 UK gal765 L202 US gal168 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,391 LC/year1,339 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Jaguar F-Pace 2.0d

  • Has 30 Nm more
  • Is 71 kg lighter
  • Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 3 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 54 km (33 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 145 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4

  • Has 10 hp more
  • Uses 0.2 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 2 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Emits 4 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Jaguar F-Pace 2.0d
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0d
2.0d
VS
JaguarF-Pace2.0dvsJaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0d
2.0 D4
2.0 T4
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4vsVolvoXC402.0 T4
2.0d
2.0 P200
VS
JaguarF-Pace2.0dvsJaguarE-Pace2.0 P200
2.0 D4
2.0 D5
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4vsVolvoXC90 II2.0 D5
2.0d
2.0i
VS
JaguarF-Pace2.0dvsJaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0i
2.0 D4
2.0d
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4vsJaguarF-Pace2.0d
2.0d
2.0 TSI
VS
JaguarF-Pace2.0dvsVolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI
2.0d
2.2d
VS
JaguarF-Pace2.0dvsMazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d
2.0 D4
2.0 TDI
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4vsAUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TDI
2.0d
20i
VS
JaguarF-Pace2.0dvsBMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201420i
2.0 D4
2.2 CRDi
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4vsHyundaiSanta Fe III (DM)Facelift 20152.2 CRDi
2.0d
2.0 D4
VS
JaguarF-Pace2.0dvsVolvoXC60 II2.0 D4
Jaguar F-Pace 2.0d vs Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4 - car comparison - FastVsFaster