Jaguar E-Pace · Facelift 2020
Car comparison
Jaguar E-Pace · Facelift 2020 2.0ivsLand Rover Discovery Sport · Facelift 2019 2.0 P290
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonLand Rover Discovery Sport · Facelift 2019
2.0 P290
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Jaguar E-Pace Facelift 2020 2.0i
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.9 s
- Fastest top speed241 km/h150 mph
- Most powerful300 hp224 kW
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lightest1,877 kg4,138 lb
- Best power-to-weight160 hp/t119 kW/t6.3 kg/hp
- Best overall score68/100
- Best performance score58/100
Land Rover Discovery Sport Facelift 2019 2.0 P290
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.6 L/100 km30.9 mpg US37.2 mpg UK
- Best estimated range882 km548 mi
- Largest trunk897 L
- Best economy score86/100
- Best practicality score92/100
Specification comparison
| Model | JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0i | Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 P290 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 300hp224kW | 290hp216kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,877kg4,138lb | 1,882kg4,149lb |
| Top speed | 241 km/h 150 mph | 233 km/h 145 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 87.0s99% target: 239 km/h / 148 mph Calculated | 89.6s99% target: 231 km/h / 143 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.9s | 7.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 28.2s Calculated | 32.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.5s Calculated | 7.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.7L/100 km24.2mpg US29.1mpg UK | 7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.9s Calculated | 15.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 160hp/t119kW/t72hp/1000 lb Calculated | 154hp/t115kW/t70hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 213Nm/t143lb-ft/ton Calculated | 213Nm/t142lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 691km429mi Calculated | 882km548mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,997cc122cu in | 1,997cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,395mm173in | 4,597mm181in |
| Height | 1,648mm65in | 1,727mm68in |
| Wheelbase | 2,681mm106in | 2,741mm108in |
| Front track | 1,625mm64in | 1,636mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,624mm64in | 1,643mm65in |
| Ground clearance | 212mm8in | 212mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 601L | 897L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,386L | 1,794L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 67L | 67L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Jaguar E-Pace Facelift 2020 2.0i: Power / Torque
- Land Rover Discovery Sport Facelift 2019 2.0 P290: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0i | 5,500 rpm | 1,500-4,500 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 P290 | 5,500 rpm | 1,500-4,500 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0i | Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 P290 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.5 s | 7.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.9 s | 7.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 28.2 s | 32.5 s |
| Top speed | 241 km/h 150 mph | 233 km/h 145 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.5 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.7 s | 10.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.6 s | 12.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.9 s | 15.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 155 km/h 96 mph | 150 km/h 93 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0i | 300 hp 224 kW |
| Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 P290 | 290 hp 216 kW |
Jaguar E-Pace Facelift 2020 2.0i has 10 hp more than Land Rover Discovery Sport Facelift 2019 2.0 P290.
The biggest power difference is between Land Rover Discovery Sport Facelift 2019 2.0 P290 and Jaguar E-Pace Facelift 2020 2.0i: 10 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0i | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 P290 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0i | 1,877 kg 4,138 lb |
| Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 P290 | 1,882 kg 4,149 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0i | 241 km/h 150 mph |
| Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 P290 | 233 km/h 145 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0i | 6.9 s |
| Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 P290 | 7.4 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Jaguar E-Pace Facelift 2020 2.0i and Land Rover Discovery Sport Facelift 2019 2.0 P290: 0.5 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0i | 9.7 L/100 km 24.2 mpg US 29.1 mpg UK |
| Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 P290 | 7.6 L/100 km 30.9 mpg US 37.2 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Land Rover Discovery Sport Facelift 2019 2.0 P290 and Jaguar E-Pace Facelift 2020 2.0i: 2.1 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0i | 160 hp/t 119 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp |
| Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 P290 | 154 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0i | 691 km 429 mi |
| Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 P290 | 882 km 548 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0i | 300 hp 224 kW | 6.9 s | 241 km/h 150 mph |
| Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 P290 | 290 hp 216 kW | 7.4 s | 233 km/h 145 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 P290 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0i |
| 9.7 L/100 km 24.2 mpg US 29.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 P290 |
| 7.6 L/100 km 30.9 mpg US 37.2 mpg UK | ||||||
Jaguar E-Pace Facelift 2020 2.0i is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0i | 9.7 L/100 km 24.2 mpg US 29.1 mpg UK | 6.9 s |
| Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 P290 | 7.6 L/100 km 30.9 mpg US 37.2 mpg UK | 7.4 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0i | 160 hp/t 119 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp | 9.7 L/100 km 24.2 mpg US 29.1 mpg UK |
| Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 P290 | 154 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | 7.6 L/100 km 30.9 mpg US 37.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0i | Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 P290 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 300 hp 224 kW | 290 hp 216 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.9 s | 7.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 241 km/h 150 mph | 233 km/h 145 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,877 kg 4,138 lb | 1,882 kg 4,149 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.7 L/100 km 24.2 mpg US 29.1 mpg UK | 7.6 L/100 km 30.9 mpg US 37.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 691 km 429 mi | 882 km 548 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 601 L 21.2 cu ft | 897 L 31.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 160 hp/t 119 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp | 154 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Jaguar E-Pace Facelift 2020 2.0i | Land Rover Discovery Sport Facelift 2019 2.0 P290 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.7 L/100 km24.2 mpg US29.1 mpg UK | 7.6 L/100 km30.9 mpg US37.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 16.97 LC100 km | 13.30 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 27.32 LC100 mi | 21.40 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,455 L384 US gal320 UK gal | 1,140 L301 US gal251 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,546 LC/year | 1,995 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Jaguar E-Pace Facelift 2020 2.0i
- Has 10 hp more
- Is 5 kg lighter
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 8 km/h (5 mph) higher top speed
- Has 6 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
Land Rover Discovery Sport Facelift 2019 2.0 P290
- Uses 2.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 191 km (119 mi) more estimated range
- Has 296 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























