AUDI Q5 II (FY)
Car comparison
AUDI Q5 II (FY) 50 TDIvsLand Rover Discovery Sport · Facelift 2019 2.0 P290
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonLand Rover Discovery Sport · Facelift 2019
2.0 P290
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI Q5 II (FY) 50 TDI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.9 s
- Fastest top speed237 km/h147 mph
- Highest torque620 Nm457 lb-ft
- Lightest1,870 kg4,123 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.1 L/100 km38.6 mpg US46.3 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,066 km662 mi
- Best overall score72/100
- Best performance score65/100
- Best economy score90/100
Land Rover Discovery Sport Facelift 2019 2.0 P290
- Most powerful290 hp216 kW
- Best power-to-weight154 hp/t115 kW/t6.5 kg/hp
- Largest trunk897 L
- Best practicality score92/100
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDIQ5 II (FY)50 TDI | Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 P290 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 286hp213kW | 290hp216kW |
| Torque | 620Nm457lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,870kg4,123lb | 1,882kg4,149lb |
| Gross weight | 2,565kg5,655lb | - |
| Top speed | 237 km/h 147 mph | 233 km/h 145 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 67.1s99% target: 235 km/h / 146 mph Calculated | 89.6s99% target: 231 km/h / 143 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.9s | 7.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 23.8s Calculated | 32.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.6s Calculated | 7.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK | 7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 14.1s Calculated | 15.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 153hp/t114kW/t69hp/1000 lb Calculated | 154hp/t115kW/t70hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 332Nm/t222lb-ft/ton Calculated | 213Nm/t142lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,066km662mi Calculated | 882km548mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,967cc181cu in | 1,997cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,663mm184in | 4,597mm181in |
| Width | 1,893mm75in | - |
| Height | 1,659mm65in | 1,727mm68in |
| Wheelbase | 2,819mm111in | 2,741mm108in |
| Front track | 1,616mm64in | 1,636mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,609mm63in | 1,643mm65in |
| Ground clearance | - | 212mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 550L | 897L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,794L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 65L | 67L |
| CO2 emissions | 162g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI Q5 II (FY) 50 TDI: Power / Torque
- Land Rover Discovery Sport Facelift 2019 2.0 P290: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)50 TDI | 3,500-4,000 rpm | 2,250-3,000 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 P290 | 5,500 rpm | 1,500-4,500 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDIQ5 II (FY)50 TDI | Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 P290 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.6 s | 7.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.9 s | 7.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 23.8 s | 32.5 s |
| Top speed | 237 km/h 147 mph | 233 km/h 145 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.1 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.2 s | 10.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.8 s | 12.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.1 s | 15.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 164 km/h 102 mph | 150 km/h 93 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)50 TDI | 286 hp 213 kW |
| Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 P290 | 290 hp 216 kW |
Land Rover Discovery Sport Facelift 2019 2.0 P290 has 4 hp more than AUDI Q5 II (FY) 50 TDI.
The biggest power difference is between AUDI Q5 II (FY) 50 TDI and Land Rover Discovery Sport Facelift 2019 2.0 P290: 4 hp (3 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)50 TDI | 620 Nm 457 lb-ft |
| Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 P290 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)50 TDI | 1,870 kg 4,123 lb |
| Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 P290 | 1,882 kg 4,149 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)50 TDI | 237 km/h 147 mph |
| Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 P290 | 233 km/h 145 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)50 TDI | 5.9 s |
| Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 P290 | 7.4 s |
Although Land Rover Discovery Sport Facelift 2019 2.0 P290 has more power, AUDI Q5 II (FY) 50 TDI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI Q5 II (FY) 50 TDI and Land Rover Discovery Sport Facelift 2019 2.0 P290: 1.5 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)50 TDI | 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK |
| Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 P290 | 7.6 L/100 km 30.9 mpg US 37.2 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between AUDI Q5 II (FY) 50 TDI and Land Rover Discovery Sport Facelift 2019 2.0 P290: 1.5 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)50 TDI | 153 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp |
| Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 P290 | 154 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)50 TDI | 1,066 km 662 mi |
| Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 P290 | 882 km 548 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)50 TDI | 286 hp 213 kW | 5.9 s | 237 km/h 147 mph |
| Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 P290 | 290 hp 216 kW | 7.4 s | 233 km/h 145 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)50 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 P290 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)50 TDI |
| 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 P290 |
| 7.6 L/100 km 30.9 mpg US 37.2 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI Q5 II (FY) 50 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)50 TDI | 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK | 5.9 s |
| Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 P290 | 7.6 L/100 km 30.9 mpg US 37.2 mpg UK | 7.4 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)50 TDI | 153 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK |
| Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 P290 | 154 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | 7.6 L/100 km 30.9 mpg US 37.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDIQ5 II (FY)50 TDI | Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 P290 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 286 hp 213 kW | 290 hp 216 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 620 Nm 457 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.9 s | 7.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 237 km/h 147 mph | 233 km/h 145 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,870 kg 4,123 lb | 1,882 kg 4,149 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK | 7.6 L/100 km 30.9 mpg US 37.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,066 km 662 mi | 882 km 548 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 162 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 550 L 19.4 cu ft | 897 L 31.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 153 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | 154 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI Q5 II (FY) 50 TDI | Land Rover Discovery Sport Facelift 2019 2.0 P290 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.1 L/100 km38.6 mpg US46.3 mpg UK | 7.6 L/100 km30.9 mpg US37.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 10.67 LC100 km | 13.30 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 17.18 LC100 mi | 21.40 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 915 L242 US gal201 UK gal | 1,140 L301 US gal251 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,601 LC/year | 1,995 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI Q5 II (FY) 50 TDI
- Has 220 Nm more
- Is 12 kg lighter
- Is 1.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 4 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.5 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 184 km (114 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Land Rover Discovery Sport Facelift 2019 2.0 P290
- Has 4 hp more
- Has 1 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 347 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























