Car comparison

Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P250vsVolkswagen Touareg III (CR) 2.0 TSI

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Jaguar E-Pace

2.0 P250

250 hp1998 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTwin-turboSUV2018-2020
VS

Volkswagen Touareg III (CR)

2.0 TSI

249 hp1984 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2018-2023

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P250

  • Fastest top speed
    230 km/h
    143 mph
  • Most powerful
    250 hp
    186 kW
  • Lightest
    1,832 kg
    4,039 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    136 hp/t
    102 kW/t
    7.3 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    7.7 L/100 km
    30.5 mpg US
    36.7 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    9.5 L/100 km
    24.8 mpg US
    29.7 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    6.6 L/100 km
    35.6 mpg US
    42.8 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    174 g/km
  • Largest trunk
    1,234 L
  • Best overall score
    66/100
  • Best performance score
    54/100
  • Best economy score
    86/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelJaguarE-Pace2.0 P250VolkswagenTouareg III (CR)2.0 TSI
Power
250hp186kW
249hp186kW
Torque
365Nm269lb-ft
370Nm273lb-ft
Curb weight
1,832kg4,039lb
1,955kg4,310lb
Gross weight
2,400kg5,291lb
-
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
225 km/h
140 mph
To 99% top speed
85.7s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph
Calculated
82.1s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.0s
6.8s
0-200 km/h
32.2s
Calculated
33.5s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.6s
Calculated
6.4s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK
8.2L/100 km28.7mpg US34.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
9.5L/100 km24.8mpg US29.7mpg UK
10L/100 km23.5mpg US28.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK
7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.0s
Calculated
14.9s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
136hp/t102kW/t62hp/1000 lb
Calculated
127hp/t95kW/t58hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
199Nm/t133lb-ft/ton
Calculated
189Nm/t127lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
890km553mi
Calculated
915km568mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,998cc122cu in
1,984cc121cu in
Length
4,395mm173in
4,878mm192in
Width
1,984mm78in
1,984mm78in
Height
1,649mm65in
1,717mm68in
Wheelbase
2,681mm106in
2,904mm114in
Front track
1,635mm64in
1,669mm66in
Rear track
1,634mm64in
1,685mm66in
Ground clearance
204mm8in
215mm8in
Trunk volume
1,234L
810L
Max trunk volume
2,577L
1,800L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
69L
75L
CO2 emissions
174g/km
188g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P250Volkswagen Touareg III (CR) 2.0 TSIPowerTorque
  • Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P250: Power / Torque
  • Volkswagen Touareg III (CR) 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P2505,500 rpm1,200-4,500 rpm5,750 rpm
VolkswagenTouareg III (CR)2.0 TSI5,000-6,000 rpm1,600-4,500 rpm6,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricJaguarE-Pace2.0 P250VolkswagenTouareg III (CR)2.0 TSI
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.6 s
6.4 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.0 s
6.8 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
32.2 s
33.5 s
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
225 km/h
140 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.4 s
2.4 s
330 ft
101 m
6.5 s
6.4 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.8 s
9.6 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.6 s
12.5 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.0 s
14.9 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
152 km/h
94 mph
152 km/h
94 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P250
250 hp
186 kW
VolkswagenTouareg III (CR)2.0 TSI
249 hp
186 kW

Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P250 has 1 hp more than Volkswagen Touareg III (CR) 2.0 TSI.

The biggest power difference is between Volkswagen Touareg III (CR) 2.0 TSI and Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P250: 1 hp (1 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P250
365 Nm
269 lb-ft
VolkswagenTouareg III (CR)2.0 TSI
370 Nm
273 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P250
1,832 kg
4,039 lb
VolkswagenTouareg III (CR)2.0 TSI
1,955 kg
4,310 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P250
230 km/h
143 mph
VolkswagenTouareg III (CR)2.0 TSI
225 km/h
140 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P2507.0 s
VolkswagenTouareg III (CR)2.0 TSI6.8 s

Although Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P250 has more power, Volkswagen Touareg III (CR) 2.0 TSI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen Touareg III (CR) 2.0 TSI and Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P250: 0.2 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P250
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK
VolkswagenTouareg III (CR)2.0 TSI
8.2 L/100 km
28.7 mpg US
34.4 mpg UK

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P250
136 hp/t
102 kW/t
7.3 kg/hp
VolkswagenTouareg III (CR)2.0 TSI
127 hp/t
95 kW/t
7.9 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P250
890 km
553 mi
VolkswagenTouareg III (CR)2.0 TSI
915 km
568 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P250
250 hp
186 kW
7.0 s
230 km/h
143 mph
VolkswagenTouareg III (CR)2.0 TSI
249 hp
186 kW
6.8 s
225 km/h
140 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P250
Power
250 hp
186 kW
0-100 km/h7.0 s
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
1,234 L
43.6 cu ft
Length
4,395 mm
173.0 in
Height
1,649 mm
64.9 in
VolkswagenTouareg III (CR)2.0 TSI
Power
249 hp
186 kW
0-100 km/h6.8 s
Top speed
225 km/h
140 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
810 L
28.6 cu ft
Length
4,878 mm
192.0 in
Height
1,717 mm
67.6 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P250
Power
250 hp
186 kW
0-100 km/h7.0 s
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK
VolkswagenTouareg III (CR)2.0 TSI
Power
249 hp
186 kW
0-100 km/h6.8 s
Top speed
225 km/h
140 mph
8.2 L/100 km
28.7 mpg US
34.4 mpg UK

Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P250 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P250
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK
7.0 s
VolkswagenTouareg III (CR)2.0 TSI
8.2 L/100 km
28.7 mpg US
34.4 mpg UK
6.8 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P250
136 hp/t
102 kW/t
7.3 kg/hp
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK
VolkswagenTouareg III (CR)2.0 TSI
127 hp/t
95 kW/t
7.9 kg/hp
8.2 L/100 km
28.7 mpg US
34.4 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleJaguarE-Pace2.0 P250VolkswagenTouareg III (CR)2.0 TSI
Power
250 hp
186 kW
249 hp
186 kW
Torque
365 Nm
269 lb-ft
370 Nm
273 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.0 s
6.8 s
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
225 km/h
140 mph
Lightness
1,832 kg
4,039 lb
1,955 kg
4,310 lb
Fuel consumption
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK
8.2 L/100 km
28.7 mpg US
34.4 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
1,234 L
43.6 cu ft
Length
4,395 mm
173.0 in
Height
1,649 mm
64.9 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
810 L
28.6 cu ft
Length
4,878 mm
192.0 in
Height
1,717 mm
67.6 in
Range score
890 km
553 mi
915 km
568 mi
CO2 score
174 g/km
188 g/km
Trunk score
1,234 L
43.6 cu ft
810 L
28.6 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
136 hp/t
102 kW/t
7.3 kg/hp
127 hp/t
95 kW/t
7.9 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleJaguar E-Pace 2.0 P250Volkswagen Touareg III (CR) 2.0 TSI
Consumption7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK8.2 L/100 km28.7 mpg US34.4 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km13.48 LC100 km14.35 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi21.69 LC100 mi23.09 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,155 L305 US gal254 UK gal1,230 L325 US gal271 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,021 LC/year2,153 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P250

  • Has 1 hp more
  • Is 123 kg lighter
  • Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 0.5 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 9 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 424 L more trunk volume
  • Emits 14 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h

Volkswagen Touareg III (CR) 2.0 TSI

  • Has 5 Nm more
  • Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 25 km (16 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest torque
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P250
Volkswagen Touareg III (CR) 2.0 TSI
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 P250
2.0i
VS
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P250vsJaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0i
2.0 TSI
3.0 V6 TDI
VS
VolkswagenTouareg III (CR)2.0 TSIvsVolkswagenTouareg III (CR)Facelift 20233.0 V6 TDI
2.0 P250
25t
VS
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P250vsJaguarF-Pace25t
2.0 TSI
3.0 V6 TDI
VS
VolkswagenTouareg III (CR)2.0 TSIvsVolkswagenTouareg II (7P)Facelift 20143.0 V6 TDI
2.0 P250
2.0i
VS
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P250vsJaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0i
2.0 TSI
3.6 FSI V6
VS
VolkswagenTouareg III (CR)2.0 TSIvsVolkswagenTouareg II (7P)3.6 FSI V6
2.0 P250
2.0 T5
VS
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P250vsVolvoXC402.0 T5
2.0 TSI
6.0 W12 48V Sport
VS
VolkswagenTouareg III (CR)2.0 TSIvsVolkswagenTouareg I (7L)6.0 W12 48V Sport
2.0 P250
2.0 T5
VS
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P250vsVolvoXC60 II2.0 T5
2.0 TSI
6.0 W12
VS
VolkswagenTouareg III (CR)2.0 TSIvsVolkswagenTouareg I (7L)Facelift 20066.0 W12
2.0 P250
2.0
VS
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P250vsPorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.0
2.0 TSI
2.0 BiTDI
VS
VolkswagenTouareg III (CR)2.0 TSIvsVolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI
Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P250 vs Volkswagen Touareg III (CR) 2.0 TSI - car comparison - FastVsFaster