Car comparison

Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P250vsSkoda Kodiaq I RS 2.0 BiTDI

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Jaguar E-Pace

2.0 P250

250 hp1998 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTwin-turboSUV2018-2020
VS

Skoda Kodiaq I

RS 2.0 BiTDI

240 hp1968 ccDieselAWDDual-clutchTwin-turboSUV2018-2020

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Skoda Kodiaq I RS 2.0 BiTDI

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.9 s
  • Highest torque
    500 Nm
    369 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    6.4 L/100 km
    36.8 mpg US
    44.1 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    7.4 L/100 km
    31.8 mpg US
    38.2 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    5.8 L/100 km
    40.6 mpg US
    48.7 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    167 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    938 km
    583 mi
  • Best overall score
    67/100
  • Best performance score
    55/100
  • Best economy score
    90/100
  • Best practicality score
    92/100

Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P250

  • Fastest top speed
    230 km/h
    143 mph
  • Most powerful
    250 hp
    186 kW
  • Lightest
    1,832 kg
    4,039 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    136 hp/t
    102 kW/t
    7.3 kg/hp
  • Largest trunk
    1,234 L

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelJaguarE-Pace2.0 P250SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI
Power
250hp186kW
240hp179kW
Torque
365Nm269lb-ft
500Nm369lb-ft
Curb weight
1,832kg4,039lb
1,923kg4,239lb
Gross weight
2,400kg5,291lb
2,421kg5,337lb
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
221 km/h
137 mph
To 99% top speed
85.9s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph
Calculated
80.2s99% target: 219 km/h / 136 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.0s
6.9s
0-200 km/h
32.3s
Calculated
35.7s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.6s
Calculated
6.5s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK
6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
9.5L/100 km24.8mpg US29.7mpg UK
7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK
5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.0s
Calculated
15.0s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
136hp/t102kW/t62hp/1000 lb
Calculated
125hp/t93kW/t57hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
199Nm/t133lb-ft/ton
Calculated
260Nm/t174lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
890km553mi
Calculated
938km583mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,998cc122cu in
1,968cc120cu in
Length
4,395mm173in
4,699mm185in
Width
1,984mm78in
1,882mm74in
Height
1,649mm65in
1,686mm66in
Wheelbase
2,681mm106in
2,789mm110in
Front track
1,635mm64in
1,579mm62in
Rear track
1,634mm64in
1,567mm62in
Ground clearance
204mm8in
197mm8in
Trunk volume
1,234L
725L
Max trunk volume
2,577L
1,960L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
69L
60L
CO2 emissions
174g/km
167g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P250Skoda Kodiaq I RS 2.0 BiTDIPowerTorque
  • Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P250: Power / Torque
  • Skoda Kodiaq I RS 2.0 BiTDI: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P2505,500 rpm1,200-4,500 rpm5,750 rpm
SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI4,000 rpm1,750-2,500 rpm4,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricJaguarE-Pace2.0 P250SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.6 s
6.5 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.0 s
6.9 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
32.3 s
35.7 s
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
221 km/h
137 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.4 s
2.4 s
330 ft
101 m
6.5 s
6.4 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.8 s
9.7 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.6 s
12.6 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.0 s
15.0 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
152 km/h
94 mph
151 km/h
94 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P250
250 hp
186 kW
SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI
240 hp
179 kW

Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P250 has 10 hp more than Skoda Kodiaq I RS 2.0 BiTDI.

The biggest power difference is between Skoda Kodiaq I RS 2.0 BiTDI and Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P250: 10 hp (7 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P250
365 Nm
269 lb-ft
SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI
500 Nm
369 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P250
1,832 kg
4,039 lb
SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI
1,923 kg
4,239 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P250
230 km/h
143 mph
SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI
221 km/h
137 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P2507.0 s
SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI6.9 s

Although Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P250 has more power, Skoda Kodiaq I RS 2.0 BiTDI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Skoda Kodiaq I RS 2.0 BiTDI and Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P250: 0.1 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P250
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK
SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Skoda Kodiaq I RS 2.0 BiTDI and Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P250: 1.3 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P250
136 hp/t
102 kW/t
7.3 kg/hp
SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI
125 hp/t
93 kW/t
8.0 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P250
890 km
553 mi
SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI
938 km
583 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P250
250 hp
186 kW
7.0 s
230 km/h
143 mph
SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI
240 hp
179 kW
6.9 s
221 km/h
137 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P250
Power
250 hp
186 kW
0-100 km/h7.0 s
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
1,234 L
43.6 cu ft
Length
4,395 mm
173.0 in
Height
1,649 mm
64.9 in
SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h6.9 s
Top speed
221 km/h
137 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
725 L
25.6 cu ft
Length
4,699 mm
185.0 in
Height
1,686 mm
66.4 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P250
Power
250 hp
186 kW
0-100 km/h7.0 s
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK
SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h6.9 s
Top speed
221 km/h
137 mph
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK

Skoda Kodiaq I RS 2.0 BiTDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P250
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK
7.0 s
SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK
6.9 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P250
136 hp/t
102 kW/t
7.3 kg/hp
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK
SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI
125 hp/t
93 kW/t
8.0 kg/hp
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleJaguarE-Pace2.0 P250SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI
Power
250 hp
186 kW
240 hp
179 kW
Torque
365 Nm
269 lb-ft
500 Nm
369 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.0 s
6.9 s
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
221 km/h
137 mph
Lightness
1,832 kg
4,039 lb
1,923 kg
4,239 lb
Fuel consumption
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
1,234 L
43.6 cu ft
Length
4,395 mm
173.0 in
Height
1,649 mm
64.9 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
725 L
25.6 cu ft
Length
4,699 mm
185.0 in
Height
1,686 mm
66.4 in
Range score
890 km
553 mi
938 km
583 mi
CO2 score
174 g/km
167 g/km
Trunk score
1,234 L
43.6 cu ft
725 L
25.6 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
136 hp/t
102 kW/t
7.3 kg/hp
125 hp/t
93 kW/t
8.0 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleJaguar E-Pace 2.0 P250Skoda Kodiaq I RS 2.0 BiTDI
Consumption7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km13.48 LC100 km11.20 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi21.69 LC100 mi18.02 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,155 L305 US gal254 UK gal960 L254 US gal211 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,021 LC/year1,680 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P250

  • Has 10 hp more
  • Is 91 kg lighter
  • Has 9 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 12 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 509 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Skoda Kodiaq I RS 2.0 BiTDI

  • Has 135 Nm more
  • Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 1.3 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 48 km (30 mi) more estimated range
  • Emits 7 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P250
Skoda Kodiaq I RS 2.0 BiTDI
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 P250
2.0i
VS
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P250vsJaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0i
RS 2.0 BiTDI
2.0 D240
VS
SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDIvsJaguarE-Pace2.0 D240
2.0 P250
25t
VS
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P250vsJaguarF-Pace25t
2.0 P250
2.0i
VS
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P250vsJaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0i
RS 2.0 BiTDI
300
VS
SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDIvsLexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300
2.0 P250
2.0 T5
VS
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P250vsVolvoXC402.0 T5
RS 2.0 BiTDI
2.0 D5
VS
SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDIvsVolvoXC60 II2.0 D5
RS 2.0 BiTDI
2.0
VS
SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDIvsPorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.0
RS 2.0 BiTDI
2.0 BiTDI
VS
SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDIvsVolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI
2.0 P250
45 TFSI
VS
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P250vsAUDIQ5 II (FY)45 TFSI
2.0 P250
30d
VS
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P250vsBMWX7 (G07)30d
RS 2.0 BiTDI
2.0 D5
VS
SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDIvsVolvoXC90 II2.0 D5
Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P250 vs Skoda Kodiaq I RS 2.0 BiTDI - car comparison - FastVsFaster