Jaguar E-Pace
Car comparison
Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P250vsPorsche Macan I (95B) 2.0
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonPorsche Macan I (95B)
2.0
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Porsche Macan I (95B) 2.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.7 s
- Most powerful252 hp188 kW
- Highest torque370 Nm273 lb-ft
- Lightest1,770 kg3,902 lb
- Best power-to-weight142 hp/t106 kW/t7.0 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.4 L/100 km31.8 mpg US38.2 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption8.6 L/100 km27.4 mpg US32.8 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions172 g/km
- Best performance score55/100
- Best economy score87/100
Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P250
- Fastest top speed230 km/h143 mph
- Lowest highway consumption6.6 L/100 km35.6 mpg US42.8 mpg UK
- Best estimated range890 km553 mi
- Largest trunk1,234 L
- Best overall score66/100
- Best practicality score91/100
Specification comparison
| Model | JaguarE-Pace2.0 P250 | PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 250hp186kW | 252hp188kW |
| Torque | 365Nm269lb-ft | 370Nm273lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,832kg4,039lb | 1,770kg3,902lb |
| Gross weight | 2,400kg5,291lb | 2,445kg5,390lb |
| Top speed | 230 km/h 143 mph | 229 km/h 142 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 85.7s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph Calculated | 80.4s99% target: 227 km/h / 141 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.0s | 6.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 32.2s Calculated | 30.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.6s Calculated | 6.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK | 7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 9.5L/100 km24.8mpg US29.7mpg UK | 8.6L/100 km27.4mpg US32.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK | 6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.0s Calculated | 14.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 136hp/t102kW/t62hp/1000 lb Calculated | 142hp/t106kW/t65hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 199Nm/t133lb-ft/ton Calculated | 209Nm/t140lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 890km553mi Calculated | 878km546mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,998cc122cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,395mm173in | 4,697mm185in |
| Width | 1,984mm78in | 1,923mm76in |
| Height | 1,649mm65in | 1,624mm64in |
| Wheelbase | 2,681mm106in | 2,807mm111in |
| Front track | 1,635mm64in | 1,655mm65in |
| Rear track | 1,634mm64in | 1,651mm65in |
| Ground clearance | 204mm8in | 185mm7in |
| Trunk volume | 1,234L | 500L |
| Max trunk volume | 2,577L | 1,500L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 69L | 65L |
| CO2 emissions | 174g/km | 172g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P250: Power / Torque
- Porsche Macan I (95B) 2.0: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarE-Pace2.0 P250 | 5,500 rpm | 1,200-4,500 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0 | 5,000-6,800 rpm | 1,600-4,500 rpm | 7,050 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | JaguarE-Pace2.0 P250 | PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.6 s | 6.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.0 s | 6.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 32.2 s | 30.9 s |
| Top speed | 230 km/h 143 mph | 229 km/h 142 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.5 s | 6.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.8 s | 9.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.6 s | 12.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.0 s | 14.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 152 km/h 94 mph | 154 km/h 96 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarE-Pace2.0 P250 | 250 hp 186 kW |
| PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0 | 252 hp 188 kW |
Porsche Macan I (95B) 2.0 has 2 hp more than Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P250.
The biggest power difference is between Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P250 and Porsche Macan I (95B) 2.0: 2 hp (1 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarE-Pace2.0 P250 | 365 Nm 269 lb-ft |
| PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0 | 370 Nm 273 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarE-Pace2.0 P250 | 1,832 kg 4,039 lb |
| PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0 | 1,770 kg 3,902 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarE-Pace2.0 P250 | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0 | 229 km/h 142 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarE-Pace2.0 P250 | 7.0 s |
| PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0 | 6.7 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Porsche Macan I (95B) 2.0 and Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P250: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarE-Pace2.0 P250 | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK |
| PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0 | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarE-Pace2.0 P250 | 136 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp |
| PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0 | 142 hp/t 106 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarE-Pace2.0 P250 | 890 km 553 mi |
| PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0 | 878 km 546 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarE-Pace2.0 P250 | 250 hp 186 kW | 7.0 s | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0 | 252 hp 188 kW | 6.7 s | 229 km/h 142 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarE-Pace2.0 P250 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarE-Pace2.0 P250 |
| 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0 |
| 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK | ||||||
Porsche Macan I (95B) 2.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarE-Pace2.0 P250 | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | 7.0 s |
| PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0 | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK | 6.7 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarE-Pace2.0 P250 | 136 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK |
| PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0 | 142 hp/t 106 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | JaguarE-Pace2.0 P250 | PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 250 hp 186 kW | 252 hp 188 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 365 Nm 269 lb-ft | 370 Nm 273 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.0 s | 6.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 230 km/h 143 mph | 229 km/h 142 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,832 kg 4,039 lb | 1,770 kg 3,902 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 890 km 553 mi | 878 km 546 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 174 g/km | 172 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 1,234 L 43.6 cu ft | 500 L 17.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 136 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | 142 hp/t 106 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P250 | Porsche Macan I (95B) 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK | 7.4 L/100 km31.8 mpg US38.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 13.48 LC100 km | 12.95 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 21.69 LC100 mi | 20.84 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,155 L305 US gal254 UK gal | 1,110 L293 US gal244 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,021 LC/year | 1,943 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P250
- Has 1 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Has 11 km (7 mi) more estimated range
- Has 734 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Highest CO2 emissions
Porsche Macan I (95B) 2.0
- Has 2 hp more
- Has 5 Nm more
- Is 62 kg lighter
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 0.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 6 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Emits 2 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























