Jaguar E-Pace
Car comparison
Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P200vsVolvo XC40 2.0 D4
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo XC40
2.0 D4
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volvo XC40 2.0 D4
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.9 s
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lightest1,728 kg3,810 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions133 g/km
- Best estimated range1,059 km658 mi
- Best performance score48/100
- Best economy score93/100
Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P200
- Fastest top speed216 km/h134 mph
- Most powerful200 hp149 kW
- Best power-to-weight114 hp/t85 kW/t8.8 kg/hp
- Largest trunk1,234 L
- Best overall score61/100
- Best practicality score91/100
Specification comparison
| Model | JaguarE-Pace2.0 P200 | VolvoXC402.0 D4 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 200hp149kW | 190hp142kW |
| Torque | 340Nm251lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,757kg3,874lb | 1,728kg3,810lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,250kg4,960lb |
| Top speed | 216 km/h 134 mph | 210 km/h 130 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 94.6s99% target: 214 km/h / 133 mph Calculated | 84.3s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.2s | 7.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 47.1s Calculated | 51.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.7s Calculated | 7.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.2L/100 km28.7mpg US34.4mpg UK | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.0s Calculated | 15.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 114hp/t85kW/t52hp/1000 lb Calculated | 110hp/t82kW/t50hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 194Nm/t129lb-ft/ton Calculated | 231Nm/t155lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 835km519mi Calculated | 1,059km658mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,998cc122cu in | 1,969cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,395mm173in | 4,425mm174in |
| Width | 1,984mm78in | 1,863mm73in |
| Height | 1,649mm65in | 1,652mm65in |
| Wheelbase | 2,681mm106in | 2,702mm106in |
| Front track | 1,635mm64in | 1,601mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,634mm64in | 1,626mm64in |
| Ground clearance | 204mm8in | 211mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 1,234L | 460L |
| Max trunk volume | 2,577L | 1,336L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 69L | 54L |
| CO2 emissions | 186g/km | 133g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P200: Power / Torque
- Volvo XC40 2.0 D4: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarE-Pace2.0 P200 | 5,500 rpm | 1,250 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| VolvoXC402.0 D4 | 4,000 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | JaguarE-Pace2.0 P200 | VolvoXC402.0 D4 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.7 s | 7.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.2 s | 7.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 47.1 s | 51.2 s |
| Top speed | 216 km/h 134 mph | 210 km/h 130 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.8 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.3 s | 10.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.4 s | 13.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.0 s | 15.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 142 km/h 88 mph | 143 km/h 89 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarE-Pace2.0 P200 | 200 hp 149 kW |
| VolvoXC402.0 D4 | 190 hp 142 kW |
Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P200 has 10 hp more than Volvo XC40 2.0 D4.
The biggest power difference is between Volvo XC40 2.0 D4 and Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P200: 10 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarE-Pace2.0 P200 | 340 Nm 251 lb-ft |
| VolvoXC402.0 D4 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarE-Pace2.0 P200 | 1,757 kg 3,874 lb |
| VolvoXC402.0 D4 | 1,728 kg 3,810 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarE-Pace2.0 P200 | 216 km/h 134 mph |
| VolvoXC402.0 D4 | 210 km/h 130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarE-Pace2.0 P200 | 8.2 s |
| VolvoXC402.0 D4 | 7.9 s |
Although Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P200 has more power, Volvo XC40 2.0 D4 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo XC40 2.0 D4 and Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P200: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarE-Pace2.0 P200 | 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC402.0 D4 | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volvo XC40 2.0 D4 and Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P200: 3.1 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarE-Pace2.0 P200 | 114 hp/t 85 kW/t 8.8 kg/hp |
| VolvoXC402.0 D4 | 110 hp/t 82 kW/t 9.1 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarE-Pace2.0 P200 | 835 km 519 mi |
| VolvoXC402.0 D4 | 1,059 km 658 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarE-Pace2.0 P200 | 200 hp 149 kW | 8.2 s | 216 km/h 134 mph |
| VolvoXC402.0 D4 | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.9 s | 210 km/h 130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarE-Pace2.0 P200 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoXC402.0 D4 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarE-Pace2.0 P200 |
| 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoXC402.0 D4 |
| 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Volvo XC40 2.0 D4 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarE-Pace2.0 P200 | 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK | 8.2 s |
| VolvoXC402.0 D4 | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK | 7.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarE-Pace2.0 P200 | 114 hp/t 85 kW/t 8.8 kg/hp | 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC402.0 D4 | 110 hp/t 82 kW/t 9.1 kg/hp | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | JaguarE-Pace2.0 P200 | VolvoXC402.0 D4 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 200 hp 149 kW | 190 hp 142 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 340 Nm 251 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.2 s | 7.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 216 km/h 134 mph | 210 km/h 130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,757 kg 3,874 lb | 1,728 kg 3,810 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 835 km 519 mi | 1,059 km 658 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 186 g/km | 133 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 1,234 L 43.6 cu ft | 460 L 16.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 114 hp/t 85 kW/t 8.8 kg/hp | 110 hp/t 82 kW/t 9.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P200 | Volvo XC40 2.0 D4 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.2 L/100 km28.7 mpg US34.4 mpg UK | 5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 14.35 LC100 km | 8.92 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 23.09 LC100 mi | 14.36 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,230 L325 US gal271 UK gal | 765 L202 US gal168 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,153 LC/year | 1,339 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P200
- Has 10 hp more
- Has 6 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
- Has 4 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 774 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Highest CO2 emissions
Volvo XC40 2.0 D4
- Has 60 Nm more
- Is 29 kg lighter
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 3.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 223 km (139 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 53 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























