Car comparison

Jaguar C-X16 3.0 V6vsMaserati GranTurismo I S 4.7 i V8 32V

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Jaguar C-X16

3.0 V6

380 hp2995 ccHybridRWDAutomaticSuperchargedCoupe2011-2011
VS

Maserati GranTurismo I

S 4.7 i V8 32V

440 hp4691 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticNaturally aspiratedCoupe2008-2012

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Jaguar C-X16 3.0 V6

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    4.4 s
  • Fastest top speed
    300 km/h
    186 mph
  • Lightest
    1,600 kg
    3,527 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    238 hp/t
    177 kW/t
    4.2 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    6.9 L/100 km
    34.1 mpg US
    40.9 mpg UK
  • Best economy score
    88/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelJaguarC-X163.0 V6MaseratiGranTurismo IS 4.7 i V8 32V
Power
380hp283kW
440hp328kW
Torque
450Nm332lb-ft
490Nm361lb-ft
Curb weight
1,600kg3,527lb
1,880kg4,145lb
Gross weight-
2,250kg4,960lb
Top speed
300 km/h
186 mph
295 km/h
183 mph
To 99% top speed
70.8s99% target: 297 km/h / 185 mph
Calculated
79.1s99% target: 292 km/h / 181 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
4.4s
4.9s
0-200 km/h
13.8s
Calculated
15.7s
Calculated
0-60 mph
4.2s
Calculated
4.7s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK
16.2L/100 km14.5mpg US17.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption city-
25.8L/100 km9.1mpg US10.9mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway-
11.2L/100 km21mpg US25.2mpg UK
Quarter mile
12.4s
Calculated
12.9s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
238hp/t177kW/t108hp/1000 lb
Calculated
234hp/t175kW/t106hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
281Nm/t188lb-ft/ton
Calculated
261Nm/t174lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range-
531km330mi
Calculated
Displacement
2,995cc183cu in
4,691cc286cu in
Length
4,445mm175in
4,881mm192in
Width
2,048mm81in
1,915mm75in
Height
1,297mm51in
1,353mm53in
Wheelbase
2,622mm103in
2,942mm116in
Front track-
1,585mm62in
Rear track-
1,560mm61in
Trunk volume-
260L
Doors
2
2
Seats
2
4
Fuel tank-
86L
CO2 emissions
165g/km
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricJaguarC-X163.0 V6MaseratiGranTurismo IS 4.7 i V8 32V
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
4.2 s
4.7 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
4.4 s
4.9 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
13.8 s
15.7 s
Top speed
300 km/h
186 mph
295 km/h
183 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.1 s
2.2 s
330 ft
101 m
5.4 s
5.7 s
1/8 mile
201 m
8.1 s
8.5 s
1000 ft
305 m
10.4 s
10.9 s
1/4 mile
402 m
12.4 s
12.9 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
190 km/h
118 mph
182 km/h
113 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarC-X163.0 V6
380 hp
283 kW
MaseratiGranTurismo IS 4.7 i V8 32V
440 hp
328 kW

Maserati GranTurismo I S 4.7 i V8 32V has 60 hp more than Jaguar C-X16 3.0 V6.

The biggest power difference is between Jaguar C-X16 3.0 V6 and Maserati GranTurismo I S 4.7 i V8 32V: 60 hp (45 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarC-X163.0 V6
450 Nm
332 lb-ft
MaseratiGranTurismo IS 4.7 i V8 32V
490 Nm
361 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarC-X163.0 V6
1,600 kg
3,527 lb
MaseratiGranTurismo IS 4.7 i V8 32V
1,880 kg
4,145 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarC-X163.0 V6
300 km/h
186 mph
MaseratiGranTurismo IS 4.7 i V8 32V
295 km/h
183 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarC-X163.0 V64.4 s
MaseratiGranTurismo IS 4.7 i V8 32V4.9 s

Although Maserati GranTurismo I S 4.7 i V8 32V has more power, Jaguar C-X16 3.0 V6 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Jaguar C-X16 3.0 V6 and Maserati GranTurismo I S 4.7 i V8 32V: 0.5 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarC-X163.0 V6
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK
MaseratiGranTurismo IS 4.7 i V8 32V
16.2 L/100 km
14.5 mpg US
17.4 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Jaguar C-X16 3.0 V6 and Maserati GranTurismo I S 4.7 i V8 32V: 9.3 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarC-X163.0 V6
238 hp/t
177 kW/t
4.2 kg/hp
MaseratiGranTurismo IS 4.7 i V8 32V
234 hp/t
175 kW/t
4.3 kg/hp

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
JaguarC-X163.0 V6
380 hp
283 kW
4.4 s
300 km/h
186 mph
MaseratiGranTurismo IS 4.7 i V8 32V
440 hp
328 kW
4.9 s
295 km/h
183 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
JaguarC-X163.0 V6
Power
380 hp
283 kW
0-100 km/h4.4 s
Top speed
300 km/h
186 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,445 mm
175.0 in
Height
1,297 mm
51.1 in
MaseratiGranTurismo IS 4.7 i V8 32V
Power
440 hp
328 kW
0-100 km/h4.9 s
Top speed
295 km/h
183 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
260 L
9.2 cu ft
Length
4,881 mm
192.2 in
Height
1,353 mm
53.3 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
JaguarC-X163.0 V6
Power
380 hp
283 kW
0-100 km/h4.4 s
Top speed
300 km/h
186 mph
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK
MaseratiGranTurismo IS 4.7 i V8 32V
Power
440 hp
328 kW
0-100 km/h4.9 s
Top speed
295 km/h
183 mph
16.2 L/100 km
14.5 mpg US
17.4 mpg UK

Jaguar C-X16 3.0 V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
JaguarC-X163.0 V6
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK
4.4 s
MaseratiGranTurismo IS 4.7 i V8 32V
16.2 L/100 km
14.5 mpg US
17.4 mpg UK
4.9 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
JaguarC-X163.0 V6
238 hp/t
177 kW/t
4.2 kg/hp
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK
MaseratiGranTurismo IS 4.7 i V8 32V
234 hp/t
175 kW/t
4.3 kg/hp
16.2 L/100 km
14.5 mpg US
17.4 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleJaguarC-X163.0 V6MaseratiGranTurismo IS 4.7 i V8 32V
Power
380 hp
283 kW
440 hp
328 kW
Torque
450 Nm
332 lb-ft
490 Nm
361 lb-ft
Acceleration
4.4 s
4.9 s
Top speed
300 km/h
186 mph
295 km/h
183 mph
Lightness
1,600 kg
3,527 lb
1,880 kg
4,145 lb
Fuel consumption
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK
16.2 L/100 km
14.5 mpg US
17.4 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,445 mm
175.0 in
Height
1,297 mm
51.1 in
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
260 L
9.2 cu ft
Length
4,881 mm
192.2 in
Height
1,353 mm
53.3 in
Range score
-
531 km
330 mi
CO2 score
165 g/km
-
Trunk score
-
260 L
9.2 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
238 hp/t
177 kW/t
4.2 kg/hp
234 hp/t
175 kW/t
4.3 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleJaguar C-X16 3.0 V6Maserati GranTurismo I S 4.7 i V8 32V
Consumption6.9 L/100 km34.1 mpg US40.9 mpg UK16.2 L/100 km14.5 mpg US17.4 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km12.08 LC100 km28.35 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi19.43 LC100 mi45.62 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,035 L273 US gal228 UK gal2,430 L642 US gal535 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,811 LC/year4,253 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Jaguar C-X16 3.0 V6

  • Is 280 kg lighter
  • Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 9.3 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 3 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Lowest power

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Jaguar C-X16 3.0 V6
Maserati GranTurismo I S 4.7 i V8 32V
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

3.0 V6
5.0 V8
VS
JaguarC-X163.0 V6vsJaguarXK Coupe (X150)Facelift 20095.0 V8
S 4.7 i V8 32V
Sport 4.7 V8
VS
MaseratiGranTurismo IS 4.7 i V8 32VvsMaseratiGranTurismo IFacelift 2017Sport 4.7 V8
3.0 V6
S 3.0 V6
VS
JaguarC-X163.0 V6vsJaguarF-type CoupeS 3.0 V6
S 4.7 i V8 32V
3.0 V6
VS
MaseratiGranTurismo IS 4.7 i V8 32VvsMaseratiGranTurismo IIFacelift 20263.0 V6
3.0 V6
3.0 V6
VS
JaguarC-X163.0 V6vsJaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20173.0 V6
S 4.7 i V8 32V
Modena 3.0 V6
VS
MaseratiGranTurismo IS 4.7 i V8 32VvsMaseratiGranTurismo IIModena 3.0 V6
3.0 V6
R 4.2 V8
VS
JaguarC-X163.0 V6vsJaguarXK Coupe (X150)R 4.2 V8
S 4.7 i V8 32V
4.2 i V8 32V
VS
MaseratiGranTurismo IS 4.7 i V8 32VvsMaseratiGranSport4.2 i V8 32V
3.0 V6
2.5 TFSI plus
VS
JaguarC-X163.0 V6vsAUDITT RS Coupe (8J)Facelift 20102.5 TFSI plus
S 4.7 i V8 32V
4200 GT 4.2i V8 32V
VS
MaseratiGranTurismo IS 4.7 i V8 32VvsMaseratiCoupe4200 GT 4.2i V8 32V
3.0 V6
E 500 V8
VS
JaguarC-X163.0 V6vsMercedes-BenzE-class Coupe (C207)E 500 V8
S 4.7 i V8 32V
4.7 V8
VS
MaseratiGranTurismo IS 4.7 i V8 32VvsAston MartinV8 VantageFacelift 20084.7 V8
Jaguar C-X16 3.0 V6 vs Maserati GranTurismo I S 4.7 i V8 32V - car comparison - FastVsFaster