Car comparison

Nissan Murano II (Z51) · Facelift 2010 3.5 V6vsInfiniti QX70 3.0D V6

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Nissan Murano II (Z51) · Facelift 2010

3.5 V6

256 hp3498 ccGasolineAWDCVTNaturally aspiratedSUV2010-2014
VS

Infiniti QX70

3.0D V6

238 hp2993 ccDieselAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2013-present

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Infiniti QX70 3.0D V6

  • Highest torque
    550 Nm
    406 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    8.6 L/100 km
    27.4 mpg US
    32.8 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    10.8 L/100 km
    21.8 mpg US
    26.2 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    7.3 L/100 km
    32.2 mpg US
    38.7 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    225 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    1,047 km
    650 mi
  • Largest trunk
    410 L
  • Best overall score
    60/100
  • Best performance score
    50/100
  • Best economy score
    84/100

Nissan Murano II (Z51) Facelift 2010 3.5 V6

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    8.0 s
  • Fastest top speed
    220 km/h
    137 mph Unrestricted
    210 km/h
    130 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    256 hp
    191 kW
  • Lightest
    1,830 kg
    4,034 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    140 hp/t
    104 kW/t
    7.1 kg/hp
  • Best practicality score
    81/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelNissanMurano II (Z51)Facelift 20103.5 V6InfinitiQX703.0D V6
Power
256hp191kW
238hp177kW
Torque
334Nm246lb-ft
550Nm406lb-ft
Curb weight
1,830kg4,034lb
2,175kg4,795lb
Gross weight
2,297kg5,064lb
-
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Calculated
212 km/h
132 mph
To 99% top speed
90.8s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph
Calculated
100.7s99% target: 210 km/h / 130 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
8.0s
8.3s
0-200 km/h
41.6s
Calculated
55.5s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.6s
Calculated
7.8s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
10.6L/100 km22.2mpg US26.6mpg UK
8.6L/100 km27.4mpg US32.8mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
14.8L/100 km15.9mpg US19.1mpg UK
10.8L/100 km21.8mpg US26.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK
7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.8s
Calculated
16.0s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
140hp/t104kW/t63hp/1000 lb
Calculated
109hp/t82kW/t50hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
183Nm/t122lb-ft/ton
Calculated
253Nm/t169lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
774km481mi
Calculated
1,047km650mi
Calculated
Displacement
3,498cc213cu in
2,993cc183cu in
Length
4,860mm191in
4,865mm192in
Width
1,885mm74in
-
Height
1,720mm68in
1,680mm66in
Wheelbase
2,825mm111in
2,885mm114in
Front track
1,610mm63in
1,635mm64in
Rear track
1,610mm63in
1,640mm65in
Ground clearance
178mm7in
-
Trunk volume
402L
410L
Max trunk volume
1,510L
-
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
82L
90L
CO2 emissions
248g/km
225g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Nissan Murano II (Z51) Facelift 2010 3.5 V6Infiniti QX70 3.0D V6PowerTorque
  • Nissan Murano II (Z51) Facelift 2010 3.5 V6: Power / Torque
  • Infiniti QX70 3.0D V6: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
NissanMurano II (Z51)Facelift 20103.5 V66,000 rpm4,400 rpm6,250 rpm
InfinitiQX703.0D V63,750 rpm1,750 rpm4,000 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricNissanMurano II (Z51)Facelift 20103.5 V6InfinitiQX703.0D V6
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.6 s
7.8 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
8.0 s
8.3 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
41.6 s
55.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Likely limited
212 km/h
132 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.5 s
330 ft
101 m
6.8 s
6.8 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.3 s
10.3 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.3 s
13.4 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.8 s
16.0 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
145 km/h
90 mph
140 km/h
87 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
NissanMurano II (Z51)Facelift 20103.5 V6
256 hp
191 kW
InfinitiQX703.0D V6
238 hp
177 kW

Nissan Murano II (Z51) Facelift 2010 3.5 V6 has 18 hp more than Infiniti QX70 3.0D V6.

The biggest power difference is between Infiniti QX70 3.0D V6 and Nissan Murano II (Z51) Facelift 2010 3.5 V6: 18 hp (13 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
NissanMurano II (Z51)Facelift 20103.5 V6
334 Nm
246 lb-ft
InfinitiQX703.0D V6
550 Nm
406 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
NissanMurano II (Z51)Facelift 20103.5 V6
1,830 kg
4,034 lb
InfinitiQX703.0D V6
2,175 kg
4,795 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
NissanMurano II (Z51)Facelift 20103.5 V6
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
InfinitiQX703.0D V6
212 km/h
132 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
NissanMurano II (Z51)Facelift 20103.5 V68.0 s
InfinitiQX703.0D V68.3 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Nissan Murano II (Z51) Facelift 2010 3.5 V6 and Infiniti QX70 3.0D V6: 0.3 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
NissanMurano II (Z51)Facelift 20103.5 V6
10.6 L/100 km
22.2 mpg US
26.6 mpg UK
InfinitiQX703.0D V6
8.6 L/100 km
27.4 mpg US
32.8 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Infiniti QX70 3.0D V6 and Nissan Murano II (Z51) Facelift 2010 3.5 V6: 2.0 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
NissanMurano II (Z51)Facelift 20103.5 V6
140 hp/t
104 kW/t
7.1 kg/hp
InfinitiQX703.0D V6
109 hp/t
82 kW/t
9.1 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
NissanMurano II (Z51)Facelift 20103.5 V6
774 km
481 mi
InfinitiQX703.0D V6
1,047 km
650 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
NissanMurano II (Z51)Facelift 20103.5 V6
256 hp
191 kW
8.0 s
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
InfinitiQX703.0D V6
238 hp
177 kW
8.3 s
212 km/h
132 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
NissanMurano II (Z51)Facelift 20103.5 V6
Power
256 hp
191 kW
0-100 km/h8.0 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
402 L
14.2 cu ft
Length
4,860 mm
191.3 in
Height
1,720 mm
67.7 in
InfinitiQX703.0D V6
Power
238 hp
177 kW
0-100 km/h8.3 s
Top speed
212 km/h
132 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
410 L
14.5 cu ft
Length
4,865 mm
191.5 in
Height
1,680 mm
66.1 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
NissanMurano II (Z51)Facelift 20103.5 V6
Power
256 hp
191 kW
0-100 km/h8.0 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
10.6 L/100 km
22.2 mpg US
26.6 mpg UK
InfinitiQX703.0D V6
Power
238 hp
177 kW
0-100 km/h8.3 s
Top speed
212 km/h
132 mph
8.6 L/100 km
27.4 mpg US
32.8 mpg UK

Infiniti QX70 3.0D V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
NissanMurano II (Z51)Facelift 20103.5 V6
10.6 L/100 km
22.2 mpg US
26.6 mpg UK
8.0 s
InfinitiQX703.0D V6
8.6 L/100 km
27.4 mpg US
32.8 mpg UK
8.3 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
NissanMurano II (Z51)Facelift 20103.5 V6
140 hp/t
104 kW/t
7.1 kg/hp
10.6 L/100 km
22.2 mpg US
26.6 mpg UK
InfinitiQX703.0D V6
109 hp/t
82 kW/t
9.1 kg/hp
8.6 L/100 km
27.4 mpg US
32.8 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleNissanMurano II (Z51)Facelift 20103.5 V6InfinitiQX703.0D V6
Power
256 hp
191 kW
238 hp
177 kW
Torque
334 Nm
246 lb-ft
550 Nm
406 lb-ft
Acceleration
8.0 s
8.3 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
212 km/h
132 mph
Lightness
1,830 kg
4,034 lb
2,175 kg
4,795 lb
Fuel consumption
10.6 L/100 km
22.2 mpg US
26.6 mpg UK
8.6 L/100 km
27.4 mpg US
32.8 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
402 L
14.2 cu ft
Length
4,860 mm
191.3 in
Height
1,720 mm
67.7 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
410 L
14.5 cu ft
Length
4,865 mm
191.5 in
Height
1,680 mm
66.1 in
Range score
774 km
481 mi
1,047 km
650 mi
CO2 score
248 g/km
225 g/km
Trunk score
402 L
14.2 cu ft
410 L
14.5 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
140 hp/t
104 kW/t
7.1 kg/hp
109 hp/t
82 kW/t
9.1 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleNissan Murano II (Z51) Facelift 2010 3.5 V6Infiniti QX70 3.0D V6
Consumption10.6 L/100 km22.2 mpg US26.6 mpg UK8.6 L/100 km27.4 mpg US32.8 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km18.55 LC100 km15.05 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi29.85 LC100 mi24.22 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,590 L420 US gal350 UK gal1,290 L341 US gal284 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,783 LC/year2,258 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Nissan Murano II (Z51) Facelift 2010 3.5 V6

  • Has 18 hp more
  • Is 345 kg lighter
  • Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 8 km/h (5 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 30 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Smallest trunk
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Infiniti QX70 3.0D V6

  • Has 216 Nm more
  • Uses 2.0 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 273 km (170 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 8 L more trunk volume
  • Emits 23 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Nissan Murano II (Z51) 3.5 V6
Infiniti QX70 3.0D V6
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

3.5 V6
3.5
VS
NissanMurano II (Z51)Facelift 20103.5 V6vsNissanMurano II (Z51)3.5
3.0D V6
GL 350 BlueTEC
VS
InfinitiQX703.0D V6vsMercedes-BenzGL (X166)GL 350 BlueTEC
3.0D V6
2.0
VS
InfinitiQX703.0D V6vsSubaruForester IV2.0
3.5 V6
28i
VS
NissanMurano II (Z51)Facelift 20103.5 V6vsBMWX3 (F25)28i
3.0D V6
3.5 V6
VS
InfinitiQX703.0D V6vsNissanMurano II (Z51)Facelift 20103.5 V6
3.5 V6
2.5 Turbo
VS
NissanMurano II (Z51)Facelift 20103.5 V6vsSubaruForester IIIFacelift 20102.5 Turbo
3.0D V6
3.0 TDI V6
VS
InfinitiQX703.0D V6vsAUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20123.0 TDI V6
3.5 V6
3.6 FSI V6
VS
NissanMurano II (Z51)Facelift 20103.5 V6vsVolkswagenTouareg II (7P)3.6 FSI V6
3.0D V6
2.0 TSI
VS
InfinitiQX703.0D V6vsVolkswagenTiguan IFacelift 20112.0 TSI
3.5 V6
30i
VS
NissanMurano II (Z51)Facelift 20103.5 V6vsBMWX5 (E70)30i
3.0D V6
2.0 D5
VS
InfinitiQX703.0D V6vsVolvoXC90 II2.0 D5
3.5 V6
28i
VS
NissanMurano II (Z51)Facelift 20103.5 V6vsBMWX1 (E84)28i
Nissan Murano II (Z51) · Facelift 2010 3.5 V6 vs Infiniti QX70 3.0D V6 - car comparison - FastVsFaster