Car comparison

Infiniti Q50 · Facelift 2017 3.5vsVolvo S90 2.0 T6

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Infiniti Q50 · Facelift 2017

3.5

306 hp3498 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticSedan2017-present
VS

Volvo S90

2.0 T6

310 hp1969 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbo + superchargedSedan2018-2020

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Infiniti Q50 Facelift 2017 3.5

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    5.4 s
  • Fastest top speed
    265 km/h
    165 mph Unrestricted
    250 km/h
    155 mph Restricted
  • Lightest
    1,861 kg
    4,103 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    164 hp/t
    123 kW/t
    6.1 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    6.8 L/100 km
    34.6 mpg US
    41.5 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    9.6 L/100 km
    24.5 mpg US
    29.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    5.3 L/100 km
    44.4 mpg US
    53.3 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    159 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    1,029 km
    640 mi
  • Best performance score
    65/100
  • Best economy score
    89/100

Volvo S90 2.0 T6

  • Most powerful
    310 hp
    231 kW
  • Highest torque
    400 Nm
    295 lb-ft
  • Largest trunk
    500 L
  • Best overall score
    69/100
  • Best practicality score
    76/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelInfinitiQ50Facelift 20173.5VolvoS902.0 T6
Power
306hp228kW
310hp231kW
Torque
350Nm258lb-ft
400Nm295lb-ft
Curb weight
1,861kg4,103lb
1,930kg4,255lb
Gross weight-
2,360kg5,203lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
55.9s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph
Calculated
61.5s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
5.4s
5.9s
0-200 km/h
16.5s
Calculated
18.1s
Calculated
0-60 mph
5.2s
Calculated
5.6s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK
7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
9.6L/100 km24.5mpg US29.4mpg UK
9.8L/100 km24mpg US28.8mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK
6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK
Quarter mile
13.4s
Calculated
13.8s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
164hp/t123kW/t75hp/1000 lb
Calculated
161hp/t120kW/t73hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
188Nm/t126lb-ft/ton
Calculated
207Nm/t139lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,029km640mi
Calculated
789km491mi
Calculated
Displacement
3,498cc213cu in
1,969cc120cu in
Length
4,810mm189in
4,963mm195in
Width
1,820mm72in
1,879mm74in
Height
1,445mm57in
1,443mm57in
Wheelbase
2,850mm112in
2,941mm116in
Front track-
1,628mm64in
Rear track-
1,629mm64in
Ground clearance-
152mm6in
Trunk volume
400L
500L
Doors
4
4
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
70L
60L
CO2 emissions
159g/km
177g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Infiniti Q50 Facelift 2017 3.5Volvo S90 2.0 T6PowerTorque
  • Infiniti Q50 Facelift 2017 3.5: Power / Torque
  • Volvo S90 2.0 T6: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
InfinitiQ50Facelift 20173.56,800 rpm5,000 rpm7,050 rpm
VolvoS902.0 T65,700 rpm2,200-5,100 rpm6,000 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricInfinitiQ50Facelift 20173.5VolvoS902.0 T6
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
5.2 s
5.6 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
5.4 s
5.9 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
16.5 s
18.1 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Likely limited
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.4 s
2.5 s
330 ft
101 m
6.0 s
6.3 s
1/8 mile
201 m
8.9 s
9.2 s
1000 ft
305 m
11.3 s
11.8 s
1/4 mile
402 m
13.4 s
13.8 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
181 km/h
112 mph
175 km/h
109 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
InfinitiQ50Facelift 20173.5
306 hp
228 kW
VolvoS902.0 T6
310 hp
231 kW

Volvo S90 2.0 T6 has 4 hp more than Infiniti Q50 Facelift 2017 3.5.

The biggest power difference is between Infiniti Q50 Facelift 2017 3.5 and Volvo S90 2.0 T6: 4 hp (3 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
InfinitiQ50Facelift 20173.5
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
VolvoS902.0 T6
400 Nm
295 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
InfinitiQ50Facelift 20173.5
1,861 kg
4,103 lb
VolvoS902.0 T6
1,930 kg
4,255 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
InfinitiQ50Facelift 20173.5
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
VolvoS902.0 T6
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
InfinitiQ50Facelift 20173.55.4 s
VolvoS902.0 T65.9 s

Although Volvo S90 2.0 T6 has more power, Infiniti Q50 Facelift 2017 3.5 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Infiniti Q50 Facelift 2017 3.5 and Volvo S90 2.0 T6: 0.5 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
InfinitiQ50Facelift 20173.5
6.8 L/100 km
34.6 mpg US
41.5 mpg UK
VolvoS902.0 T6
7.6 L/100 km
30.9 mpg US
37.2 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Infiniti Q50 Facelift 2017 3.5 and Volvo S90 2.0 T6: 0.8 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
InfinitiQ50Facelift 20173.5
164 hp/t
123 kW/t
6.1 kg/hp
VolvoS902.0 T6
161 hp/t
120 kW/t
6.2 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
InfinitiQ50Facelift 20173.5
1,029 km
640 mi
VolvoS902.0 T6
789 km
491 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
InfinitiQ50Facelift 20173.5
306 hp
228 kW
5.4 s
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
VolvoS902.0 T6
310 hp
231 kW
5.9 s
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
InfinitiQ50Facelift 20173.5
Power
306 hp
228 kW
0-100 km/h5.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
400 L
14.1 cu ft
Length
4,810 mm
189.4 in
Height
1,445 mm
56.9 in
VolvoS902.0 T6
Power
310 hp
231 kW
0-100 km/h5.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
500 L
17.7 cu ft
Length
4,963 mm
195.4 in
Height
1,443 mm
56.8 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
InfinitiQ50Facelift 20173.5
Power
306 hp
228 kW
0-100 km/h5.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
6.8 L/100 km
34.6 mpg US
41.5 mpg UK
VolvoS902.0 T6
Power
310 hp
231 kW
0-100 km/h5.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
7.6 L/100 km
30.9 mpg US
37.2 mpg UK

Infiniti Q50 Facelift 2017 3.5 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
InfinitiQ50Facelift 20173.5
6.8 L/100 km
34.6 mpg US
41.5 mpg UK
5.4 s
VolvoS902.0 T6
7.6 L/100 km
30.9 mpg US
37.2 mpg UK
5.9 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
InfinitiQ50Facelift 20173.5
164 hp/t
123 kW/t
6.1 kg/hp
6.8 L/100 km
34.6 mpg US
41.5 mpg UK
VolvoS902.0 T6
161 hp/t
120 kW/t
6.2 kg/hp
7.6 L/100 km
30.9 mpg US
37.2 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleInfinitiQ50Facelift 20173.5VolvoS902.0 T6
Power
306 hp
228 kW
310 hp
231 kW
Torque
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
Acceleration
5.4 s
5.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Lightness
1,861 kg
4,103 lb
1,930 kg
4,255 lb
Fuel consumption
6.8 L/100 km
34.6 mpg US
41.5 mpg UK
7.6 L/100 km
30.9 mpg US
37.2 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
400 L
14.1 cu ft
Length
4,810 mm
189.4 in
Height
1,445 mm
56.9 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
500 L
17.7 cu ft
Length
4,963 mm
195.4 in
Height
1,443 mm
56.8 in
Range score
1,029 km
640 mi
789 km
491 mi
CO2 score
159 g/km
177 g/km
Trunk score
400 L
14.1 cu ft
500 L
17.7 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
164 hp/t
123 kW/t
6.1 kg/hp
161 hp/t
120 kW/t
6.2 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleInfiniti Q50 Facelift 2017 3.5Volvo S90 2.0 T6
Consumption6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK7.6 L/100 km30.9 mpg US37.2 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km11.90 LC100 km13.30 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi19.15 LC100 mi21.40 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,020 L269 US gal224 UK gal1,140 L301 US gal251 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,785 LC/year1,995 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Infiniti Q50 Facelift 2017 3.5

  • Is 69 kg lighter
  • Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 0.8 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 4 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 240 km (149 mi) more estimated range
  • Emits 18 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Smallest trunk

Volvo S90 2.0 T6

  • Has 4 hp more
  • Has 50 Nm more
  • Has 100 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Infiniti Q50 3.5
Volvo S90 2.0 T6
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

3.5
3.0d V6
VS
InfinitiQ50Facelift 20173.5vsJaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0d V6
2.0 T6
2.0 T6
VS
VolvoS902.0 T6vsVolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T6
3.5
740d
VS
InfinitiQ50Facelift 20173.5vsBMW7 Series (G11)740d
2.0 T6
E 350
VS
VolvoS902.0 T6vsMercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 350
2.0 T6
3.0 T6
VS
VolvoS902.0 T6vsVolvoS60 II3.0 T6
3.5
2.0
VS
InfinitiQ50Facelift 20173.5vsJaguarXF (X260)2.0
3.5
2.0
VS
InfinitiQ50Facelift 20173.5vsJaguarXE (X760)2.0
2.0 T6
740d
VS
VolvoS902.0 T6vsBMW7 Series (G11 LCI)Facelift 2019740d
3.5
2.0 TFSI
VS
InfinitiQ50Facelift 20173.5vsAUDIS3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI
2.0 T6
P300
VS
VolvoS902.0 T6vsJaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019P300
3.5
450h V6
VS
InfinitiQ50Facelift 20173.5vsLexusGS IVFacelift 2015450h V6
2.0 T6
50 TDI V6
VS
VolvoS902.0 T6vsAUDIA6 Sedan (C8)50 TDI V6
Infiniti Q50 · Facelift 2017 3.5 vs Volvo S90 2.0 T6 - car comparison - FastVsFaster