Infiniti Q50 · Facelift 2017
Car comparison
Infiniti Q50 · Facelift 2017 2.2d · Stage 3vsInfiniti Q50 · Facelift 2017 2.2d · Stage 2vsInfiniti Q50 · Facelift 2017 2.2d · Stage 1vsInfiniti Q50 · Facelift 2017 2.2d
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonInfiniti Q50 · Facelift 2017
2.2d (Stage 2)
Infiniti Q50 · Facelift 2017
2.2d (Stage 1)
Infiniti Q50 · Facelift 2017
2.2d
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Infiniti Q50 Facelift 2017 2.2d (Stage 3) 264 hp
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.6 s
- Fastest top speed272 km/h169 mph
- Most powerful264 hp196 kW
- Highest torque640 Nm472 lb-ft
- Lightest1,796 kg3,960 lb
- Best power-to-weight147 hp/t109 kW/t6.8 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.6 L/100 km51.1 mpg US61.4 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.7 L/100 km41.3 mpg US49.6 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.0 L/100 km58.8 mpg US70.6 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions123 g/km
- Best estimated range1,609 km1,000 mi
- Largest trunk450 L
- Best overall score68/100
- Best performance score66/100
- Best economy score94/100
- Best practicality score73/100
Specification comparison
| Model | InfinitiQ50Facelift 20172.2d (Stage 3)264 hp | InfinitiQ50Facelift 20172.2d (Stage 2)230 hp | InfinitiQ50Facelift 20172.2d (Stage 1)204 hp | InfinitiQ50Facelift 20172.2d170 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 264hp196kW+94 hp | 230hp171kW+60 hp | 204hp152kW+34 hp | 170hp127kW |
| Torque | 640Nm472lb-ft+240 Nm | 560Nm413lb-ft+160 Nm | 500Nm369lb-ft+100 Nm | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,796kg3,960lb | 1,796kg3,960lb | 1,796kg3,960lb | 1,796kg3,960lb |
| Top speed | 272 km/h 169 mph | 259 km/h 161 mph | 248 km/h 154 mph | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 71.5s99% target: 269 km/h / 167 mph-9.4 s Calculated | 75.3s99% target: 256 km/h / 159 mph-5.6 s Calculated | 78.0s99% target: 246 km/h / 153 mph-2.9 s Calculated | 80.9s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.6s-2.1 s | 7.2s-1.5 s | 7.8s-0.9 s | 8.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 19.8s-14.0 s Calculated | 23.0s-10.9 s Calculated | 26.3s-7.6 s Calculated | 33.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.3s-2.0 s Calculated | 6.9s-1.4 s Calculated | 7.4s-0.9 s Calculated | 8.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 4.6L/100 km51.1mpg US61.4mpg UK | 4.6L/100 km51.1mpg US61.4mpg UK | 4.6L/100 km51.1mpg US61.4mpg UK | 4.6L/100 km51.1mpg US61.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK | 5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK | 5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK | 5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4L/100 km58.8mpg US70.6mpg UK | 4L/100 km58.8mpg US70.6mpg UK | 4L/100 km58.8mpg US70.6mpg UK | 4L/100 km58.8mpg US70.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.5s-1.8 s Calculated | 15.1s-1.3 s Calculated | 15.5s-0.8 s Calculated | 16.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 147hp/t109kW/t67hp/1000 lb Calculated | 128hp/t95kW/t58hp/1000 lb Calculated | 114hp/t85kW/t52hp/1000 lb Calculated | 95hp/t71kW/t43hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 356Nm/t238lb-ft/ton Calculated | 312Nm/t209lb-ft/ton Calculated | 278Nm/t186lb-ft/ton Calculated | 223Nm/t149lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,609km1,000mi Calculated | 1,609km1,000mi Calculated | 1,609km1,000mi Calculated | 1,609km1,000mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,143cc131cu in | 2,143cc131cu in | 2,143cc131cu in | 2,143cc131cu in |
| Length | 4,810mm189in | 4,810mm189in | 4,810mm189in | 4,810mm189in |
| Width | 1,820mm72in | 1,820mm72in | 1,820mm72in | 1,820mm72in |
| Height | 1,445mm57in | 1,445mm57in | 1,445mm57in | 1,445mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,850mm112in | 2,850mm112in | 2,850mm112in | 2,850mm112in |
| Trunk volume | 450L | 450L | 450L | 450L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 74L | 74L | 74L | 74L |
| CO2 emissions | 123g/km | 123g/km | 123g/km | 123g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Infiniti Q50 Facelift 2017 2.2d (Stage 3) 264 hp: Power / Torque
- Infiniti Q50 Facelift 2017 2.2d (Stage 2) 230 hp: Power / Torque
- Infiniti Q50 Facelift 2017 2.2d (Stage 1) 204 hp: Power / Torque
- Infiniti Q50 Facelift 2017 2.2d 170 hp: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| InfinitiQ50Facelift 20172.2d (Stage 3)264 hp | 3,200-4,000 rpm | 1,600-2,800 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| InfinitiQ50Facelift 20172.2d (Stage 2)230 hp | 3,200-4,000 rpm | 1,600-2,800 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| InfinitiQ50Facelift 20172.2d (Stage 1)204 hp | 3,200-4,000 rpm | 1,600-2,800 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| InfinitiQ50Facelift 20172.2d170 hp | 3,200-4,000 rpm | 1,600-2,800 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | InfinitiQ50Facelift 20172.2d (Stage 3)264 hp | InfinitiQ50Facelift 20172.2d (Stage 2)230 hp | InfinitiQ50Facelift 20172.2d (Stage 1)204 hp | InfinitiQ50Facelift 20172.2d170 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.3 s | 6.9 s | 7.4 s | 8.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.6 s | 7.2 s | 7.8 s | 8.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 19.8 s | 23.0 s | 26.3 s | 33.9 s |
| Top speed | 272 km/h 169 mph | 259 km/h 161 mph | 248 km/h 154 mph | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.7 s | 2.8 s | 2.9 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.6 s | 6.9 s | 7.0 s | 7.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.7 s | 10.1 s | 10.4 s | 10.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.3 s | 12.8 s | 13.2 s | 13.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.5 s | 15.1 s | 15.5 s | 16.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 170 km/h 106 mph | 162 km/h 101 mph | 157 km/h 97 mph | 148 km/h 92 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| InfinitiQ50Facelift 20172.2d (Stage 3)264 hp | 264 hp 196 kW |
| InfinitiQ50Facelift 20172.2d (Stage 2)230 hp | 230 hp 171 kW |
| InfinitiQ50Facelift 20172.2d (Stage 1)204 hp | 204 hp 152 kW |
| InfinitiQ50Facelift 20172.2d170 hp | 170 hp 127 kW |
Infiniti Q50 Facelift 2017 2.2d (Stage 3) 264 hp has 94 hp more than Infiniti Q50 Facelift 2017 2.2d 170 hp.
The biggest power difference is between Infiniti Q50 Facelift 2017 2.2d 170 hp and Infiniti Q50 Facelift 2017 2.2d (Stage 3) 264 hp: 94 hp (70 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| InfinitiQ50Facelift 20172.2d (Stage 3)264 hp | 640 Nm 472 lb-ft |
| InfinitiQ50Facelift 20172.2d (Stage 2)230 hp | 560 Nm 413 lb-ft |
| InfinitiQ50Facelift 20172.2d (Stage 1)204 hp | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft |
| InfinitiQ50Facelift 20172.2d170 hp | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| InfinitiQ50Facelift 20172.2d (Stage 3)264 hp | 1,796 kg 3,960 lb |
| InfinitiQ50Facelift 20172.2d (Stage 2)230 hp | 1,796 kg 3,960 lb |
| InfinitiQ50Facelift 20172.2d (Stage 1)204 hp | 1,796 kg 3,960 lb |
| InfinitiQ50Facelift 20172.2d170 hp | 1,796 kg 3,960 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| InfinitiQ50Facelift 20172.2d (Stage 3)264 hp | 272 km/h 169 mph |
| InfinitiQ50Facelift 20172.2d (Stage 2)230 hp | 259 km/h 161 mph |
| InfinitiQ50Facelift 20172.2d (Stage 1)204 hp | 248 km/h 154 mph |
| InfinitiQ50Facelift 20172.2d170 hp | 230 km/h 143 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| InfinitiQ50Facelift 20172.2d (Stage 3)264 hp | 6.6 s |
| InfinitiQ50Facelift 20172.2d (Stage 2)230 hp | 7.2 s |
| InfinitiQ50Facelift 20172.2d (Stage 1)204 hp | 7.8 s |
| InfinitiQ50Facelift 20172.2d170 hp | 8.7 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Infiniti Q50 Facelift 2017 2.2d (Stage 3) 264 hp and Infiniti Q50 Facelift 2017 2.2d 170 hp: 2.1 s.
The closest cars by acceleration are Infiniti Q50 Facelift 2017 2.2d (Stage 2) 230 hp and Infiniti Q50 Facelift 2017 2.2d (Stage 1) 204 hp, separated by only 0.5 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| InfinitiQ50Facelift 20172.2d (Stage 3)264 hp | 4.6 L/100 km 51.1 mpg US 61.4 mpg UK |
| InfinitiQ50Facelift 20172.2d (Stage 2)230 hp | 4.6 L/100 km 51.1 mpg US 61.4 mpg UK |
| InfinitiQ50Facelift 20172.2d (Stage 1)204 hp | 4.6 L/100 km 51.1 mpg US 61.4 mpg UK |
| InfinitiQ50Facelift 20172.2d170 hp | 4.6 L/100 km 51.1 mpg US 61.4 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| InfinitiQ50Facelift 20172.2d (Stage 3)264 hp | 147 hp/t 109 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp |
| InfinitiQ50Facelift 20172.2d (Stage 2)230 hp | 128 hp/t 95 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp |
| InfinitiQ50Facelift 20172.2d (Stage 1)204 hp | 114 hp/t 85 kW/t 8.8 kg/hp |
| InfinitiQ50Facelift 20172.2d170 hp | 95 hp/t 71 kW/t 10.6 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| InfinitiQ50Facelift 20172.2d (Stage 3)264 hp | 1,609 km 1,000 mi |
| InfinitiQ50Facelift 20172.2d (Stage 2)230 hp | 1,609 km 1,000 mi |
| InfinitiQ50Facelift 20172.2d (Stage 1)204 hp | 1,609 km 1,000 mi |
| InfinitiQ50Facelift 20172.2d170 hp | 1,609 km 1,000 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| InfinitiQ50Facelift 20172.2d (Stage 3)264 hp | 264 hp 196 kW | 6.6 s | 272 km/h 169 mph |
| InfinitiQ50Facelift 20172.2d (Stage 2)230 hp | 230 hp 171 kW | 7.2 s | 259 km/h 161 mph |
| InfinitiQ50Facelift 20172.2d (Stage 1)204 hp | 204 hp 152 kW | 7.8 s | 248 km/h 154 mph |
| InfinitiQ50Facelift 20172.2d170 hp | 170 hp 127 kW | 8.7 s | 230 km/h 143 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| InfinitiQ50Facelift 20172.2d (Stage 3)264 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| InfinitiQ50Facelift 20172.2d (Stage 2)230 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| InfinitiQ50Facelift 20172.2d (Stage 1)204 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| InfinitiQ50Facelift 20172.2d170 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| InfinitiQ50Facelift 20172.2d (Stage 3)264 hp |
| 4.6 L/100 km 51.1 mpg US 61.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| InfinitiQ50Facelift 20172.2d (Stage 2)230 hp |
| 4.6 L/100 km 51.1 mpg US 61.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| InfinitiQ50Facelift 20172.2d (Stage 1)204 hp |
| 4.6 L/100 km 51.1 mpg US 61.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| InfinitiQ50Facelift 20172.2d170 hp |
| 4.6 L/100 km 51.1 mpg US 61.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Infiniti Q50 Facelift 2017 2.2d (Stage 3) 264 hp is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| InfinitiQ50Facelift 20172.2d (Stage 3)264 hp | 4.6 L/100 km 51.1 mpg US 61.4 mpg UK | 6.6 s |
| InfinitiQ50Facelift 20172.2d (Stage 2)230 hp | 4.6 L/100 km 51.1 mpg US 61.4 mpg UK | 7.2 s |
| InfinitiQ50Facelift 20172.2d (Stage 1)204 hp | 4.6 L/100 km 51.1 mpg US 61.4 mpg UK | 7.8 s |
| InfinitiQ50Facelift 20172.2d170 hp | 4.6 L/100 km 51.1 mpg US 61.4 mpg UK | 8.7 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| InfinitiQ50Facelift 20172.2d (Stage 3)264 hp | 147 hp/t 109 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 4.6 L/100 km 51.1 mpg US 61.4 mpg UK |
| InfinitiQ50Facelift 20172.2d (Stage 2)230 hp | 128 hp/t 95 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp | 4.6 L/100 km 51.1 mpg US 61.4 mpg UK |
| InfinitiQ50Facelift 20172.2d (Stage 1)204 hp | 114 hp/t 85 kW/t 8.8 kg/hp | 4.6 L/100 km 51.1 mpg US 61.4 mpg UK |
| InfinitiQ50Facelift 20172.2d170 hp | 95 hp/t 71 kW/t 10.6 kg/hp | 4.6 L/100 km 51.1 mpg US 61.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | InfinitiQ50Facelift 20172.2d (Stage 3)264 hp | InfinitiQ50Facelift 20172.2d (Stage 2)230 hp | InfinitiQ50Facelift 20172.2d (Stage 1)204 hp | InfinitiQ50Facelift 20172.2d170 hp | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 264 hp 196 kW | 230 hp 171 kW | 204 hp 152 kW | 170 hp 127 kW | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 640 Nm 472 lb-ft | 560 Nm 413 lb-ft | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.6 s | 7.2 s | 7.8 s | 8.7 s | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 272 km/h 169 mph | 259 km/h 161 mph | 248 km/h 154 mph | 230 km/h 143 mph | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,796 kg 3,960 lb | 1,796 kg 3,960 lb | 1,796 kg 3,960 lb | 1,796 kg 3,960 lb | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 4.6 L/100 km 51.1 mpg US 61.4 mpg UK | 4.6 L/100 km 51.1 mpg US 61.4 mpg UK | 4.6 L/100 km 51.1 mpg US 61.4 mpg UK | 4.6 L/100 km 51.1 mpg US 61.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,609 km 1,000 mi | 1,609 km 1,000 mi | 1,609 km 1,000 mi | 1,609 km 1,000 mi | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 123 g/km | 123 g/km | 123 g/km | 123 g/km | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 450 L 15.9 cu ft | 450 L 15.9 cu ft | 450 L 15.9 cu ft | 450 L 15.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 147 hp/t 109 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 128 hp/t 95 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp | 114 hp/t 85 kW/t 8.8 kg/hp | 95 hp/t 71 kW/t 10.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Infiniti Q50 Facelift 2017 2.2d (Stage 3) 264 hp | Infiniti Q50 Facelift 2017 2.2d (Stage 2) 230 hp | Infiniti Q50 Facelift 2017 2.2d (Stage 1) 204 hp | Infiniti Q50 Facelift 2017 2.2d 170 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 4.6 L/100 km51.1 mpg US61.4 mpg UK | 4.6 L/100 km51.1 mpg US61.4 mpg UK | 4.6 L/100 km51.1 mpg US61.4 mpg UK | 4.6 L/100 km51.1 mpg US61.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 8.05 LC100 km | 8.05 LC100 km | 8.05 LC100 km | 8.05 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 12.96 LC100 mi | 12.96 LC100 mi | 12.96 LC100 mi | 12.96 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 690 L182 US gal152 UK gal | 690 L182 US gal152 UK gal | 690 L182 US gal152 UK gal | 690 L182 US gal152 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,208 LC/year | 1,208 LC/year | 1,208 LC/year | 1,208 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Infiniti Q50 Facelift 2017 2.2d (Stage 3) 264 hp
- Has 34 hp more
- Has 80 Nm more
- Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 13 km/h (8 mph) higher top speed
- Has 19 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest CO2 emissions
Infiniti Q50 Facelift 2017 2.2d (Stage 2) 230 hp
No measurable advantages in the available data.
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























