Car comparison

Infiniti Q50 · Facelift 2017 2.0tvsVolvo S60 II · Facelift 2013 2.0 T4

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Infiniti Q50 · Facelift 2017

2.0t

211 hp1991 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticTurbochargedSedan2017-present
VS

Volvo S60 II · Facelift 2013

2.0 T4

190 hp1969 ccGasolineFWDManualTurbochargedSedan2015-2018

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Infiniti Q50 Facelift 2017 2.0t

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.2 s
  • Fastest top speed
    245 km/h
    152 mph
  • Most powerful
    211 hp
    157 kW
  • Highest torque
    350 Nm
    258 lb-ft
  • Best power-to-weight
    125 hp/t
    93 kW/t
    8.0 kg/hp
  • Best estimated range
    1,231 km
    765 mi
  • Largest trunk
    500 L
  • Best overall score
    61/100
  • Best performance score
    54/100
  • Best practicality score
    75/100

Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T4

  • Lightest
    1,530 kg
    3,373 lb
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    5.6 L/100 km
    42.0 mpg US
    50.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    7.4 L/100 km
    31.8 mpg US
    38.2 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    4.6 L/100 km
    51.1 mpg US
    61.4 mpg UK
  • Best economy score
    92/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelInfinitiQ50Facelift 20172.0tVolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T4
Power
211hp157kW
190hp142kW
Torque
350Nm258lb-ft
300Nm221lb-ft
Curb weight
1,692kg3,730lb
1,530kg3,373lb
Gross weight-
2,060kg4,542lb
Top speed
245 km/h
152 mph
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
69.5s99% target: 243 km/h / 151 mph
Calculated
69.5s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.2s
7.2s
0-200 km/h
24.5s
Calculated
25.6s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.9s
Calculated
6.9s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK
5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK
7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK
4.6L/100 km51.1mpg US61.4mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.1s
Calculated
15.1s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
125hp/t93kW/t57hp/1000 lb
Calculated
124hp/t93kW/t56hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
207Nm/t138lb-ft/ton
Calculated
196Nm/t131lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,231km765mi
Calculated
1,205km749mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,991cc121cu in
1,969cc120cu in
Length
4,810mm189in
4,635mm182in
Width
1,820mm72in
1,865mm73in
Height
1,445mm57in
1,484mm58in
Wheelbase
2,850mm112in
2,776mm109in
Front track-
1,588mm63in
Rear track-
1,585mm62in
Ground clearance-
136mm5in
Trunk volume
500L
380L
Doors
4
4
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
80L
68L
CO2 emissions
151g/km
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Infiniti Q50 Facelift 2017 2.0tVolvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T4PowerTorque
  • Infiniti Q50 Facelift 2017 2.0t: Power / Torque
  • Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T4: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
InfinitiQ50Facelift 20172.0t5,500 rpm1,250-3,500 rpm5,750 rpm
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T44,700 rpm1,300-4,000 rpm6,000 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricInfinitiQ50Facelift 20172.0tVolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T4
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.9 s
6.9 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.2 s
7.2 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
24.5 s
25.6 s
Top speed
245 km/h
152 mph
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.7 s
2.7 s
330 ft
101 m
6.8 s
6.8 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.1 s
10.0 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.8 s
12.8 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.1 s
15.1 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
161 km/h
100 mph
159 km/h
99 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
InfinitiQ50Facelift 20172.0t
211 hp
157 kW
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T4
190 hp
142 kW

Infiniti Q50 Facelift 2017 2.0t has 21 hp more than Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T4.

The biggest power difference is between Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T4 and Infiniti Q50 Facelift 2017 2.0t: 21 hp (16 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
InfinitiQ50Facelift 20172.0t
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T4
300 Nm
221 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
InfinitiQ50Facelift 20172.0t
1,692 kg
3,730 lb
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T4
1,530 kg
3,373 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
InfinitiQ50Facelift 20172.0t
245 km/h
152 mph
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T4
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
InfinitiQ50Facelift 20172.0t7.2 s
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T47.2 s

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
InfinitiQ50Facelift 20172.0t
6.5 L/100 km
36.2 mpg US
43.5 mpg UK
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T4
5.6 L/100 km
42.0 mpg US
50.4 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T4 and Infiniti Q50 Facelift 2017 2.0t: 0.9 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
InfinitiQ50Facelift 20172.0t
125 hp/t
93 kW/t
8.0 kg/hp
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T4
124 hp/t
93 kW/t
8.1 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
InfinitiQ50Facelift 20172.0t
1,231 km
765 mi
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T4
1,205 km
749 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
InfinitiQ50Facelift 20172.0t
211 hp
157 kW
7.2 s
245 km/h
152 mph
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T4
190 hp
142 kW
7.2 s
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
InfinitiQ50Facelift 20172.0t
Power
211 hp
157 kW
0-100 km/h7.2 s
Top speed
245 km/h
152 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
500 L
17.7 cu ft
Length
4,810 mm
189.4 in
Height
1,445 mm
56.9 in
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T4
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.2 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
380 L
13.4 cu ft
Length
4,635 mm
182.5 in
Height
1,484 mm
58.4 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
InfinitiQ50Facelift 20172.0t
Power
211 hp
157 kW
0-100 km/h7.2 s
Top speed
245 km/h
152 mph
6.5 L/100 km
36.2 mpg US
43.5 mpg UK
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T4
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.2 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
5.6 L/100 km
42.0 mpg US
50.4 mpg UK

Infiniti Q50 Facelift 2017 2.0t is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
InfinitiQ50Facelift 20172.0t
6.5 L/100 km
36.2 mpg US
43.5 mpg UK
7.2 s
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T4
5.6 L/100 km
42.0 mpg US
50.4 mpg UK
7.2 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
InfinitiQ50Facelift 20172.0t
125 hp/t
93 kW/t
8.0 kg/hp
6.5 L/100 km
36.2 mpg US
43.5 mpg UK
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T4
124 hp/t
93 kW/t
8.1 kg/hp
5.6 L/100 km
42.0 mpg US
50.4 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleInfinitiQ50Facelift 20172.0tVolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T4
Power
211 hp
157 kW
190 hp
142 kW
Torque
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
300 Nm
221 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.2 s
7.2 s
Top speed
245 km/h
152 mph
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Lightness
1,692 kg
3,730 lb
1,530 kg
3,373 lb
Fuel consumption
6.5 L/100 km
36.2 mpg US
43.5 mpg UK
5.6 L/100 km
42.0 mpg US
50.4 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
500 L
17.7 cu ft
Length
4,810 mm
189.4 in
Height
1,445 mm
56.9 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
380 L
13.4 cu ft
Length
4,635 mm
182.5 in
Height
1,484 mm
58.4 in
Range score
1,231 km
765 mi
1,205 km
749 mi
CO2 score
151 g/km
-
Trunk score
500 L
17.7 cu ft
380 L
13.4 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
125 hp/t
93 kW/t
8.0 kg/hp
124 hp/t
93 kW/t
8.1 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleInfiniti Q50 Facelift 2017 2.0tVolvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T4
Consumption6.5 L/100 km36.2 mpg US43.5 mpg UK5.6 L/100 km42 mpg US50.4 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km11.38 LC100 km9.80 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi18.31 LC100 mi15.77 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used975 L258 US gal214 UK gal840 L222 US gal185 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,706 LC/year1,470 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Infiniti Q50 Facelift 2017 2.0t

  • Has 21 hp more
  • Has 50 Nm more
  • Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 1 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 25 km (16 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 120 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest

Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T4

  • Is 162 kg lighter
  • Uses 0.9 L/100 km less fuel

Pros

  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Infiniti Q50 2.0t
Volvo S60 II 2.0 T4
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0t
E 250
VS
InfinitiQ50Facelift 20172.0tvsMercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 250
2.0 T4
2.4 D5
VS
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T4vsVolvoS60 II2.4 D5
2.0t
Veloce 2.2 JTD
VS
InfinitiQ50Facelift 20172.0tvsAlfa RomeoGiulia (952)Veloce 2.2 JTD
2.0 T4
2.4i T5 20V
VS
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T4vsVolvoS602.4i T5 20V
2.0t
C 250d
VS
InfinitiQ50Facelift 20172.0tvsMercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 250d
2.0 T4
2.0 D4
VS
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T4vsVolvoS902.0 D4
2.0t
2.0
VS
InfinitiQ50Facelift 20172.0tvsJaguarXF (X260)2.0
2.0 T4
2.0 TDI
VS
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T4vsVolkswagenPassat (B8)2.0 TDI
2.0t
1.6 Energy TCe
VS
InfinitiQ50Facelift 20172.0tvsRenaultTalisman1.6 Energy TCe
2.0t
2.0
VS
InfinitiQ50Facelift 20172.0tvsJaguarXE (X760)2.0
2.0 T4
2.0 TDI
VS
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T4vsAUDIA3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI
2.0t
E 250
VS
InfinitiQ50Facelift 20172.0tvsMercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 250
Infiniti Q50 · Facelift 2017 2.0t vs Volvo S60 II · Facelift 2013 2.0 T4 - car comparison - FastVsFaster