Car comparison

Volvo V40 · Facelift 2016 2.0 D4vsHyundai Veloster · Facelift 2015 1.6

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Volvo V40 · Facelift 2016

2.0 D4

190 hp1969 ccDieselFWDManualTwin-turboHatchback2016-2018
VS

Hyundai Veloster · Facelift 2015

1.6

186 hp1591 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticTurbochargedHatchback2015-2018

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Volvo V40 Facelift 2016 2.0 D4

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.4 s
  • Fastest top speed
    230 km/h
    143 mph
  • Most powerful
    190 hp
    142 kW
  • Highest torque
    400 Nm
    295 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    3.8 L/100 km
    61.9 mpg US
    74.3 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    4.2 L/100 km
    56.0 mpg US
    67.3 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    3.6 L/100 km
    65.3 mpg US
    78.5 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    99 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    1,632 km
    1,014 mi
  • Largest trunk
    335 L
  • Best overall score
    58/100
  • Best performance score
    52/100
  • Best economy score
    97/100
  • Best practicality score
    72/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelVolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4HyundaiVelosterFacelift 20151.6
Power
190hp142kW
186hp139kW
Torque
400Nm295lb-ft
265Nm195lb-ft
Curb weight
1,503kg3,314lb
1,285kg2,833lb
Gross weight
2,005kg4,420lb
1,750kg3,858lb
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
214 km/h
133 mph
To 99% top speed
85.3s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph
Calculated
77.2s99% target: 212 km/h / 132 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.4s
8.0s
0-200 km/h
32.8s
Calculated
42.5s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.0s
Calculated
7.6s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
3.8L/100 km61.9mpg US74.3mpg UK
7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
4.2L/100 km56mpg US67.3mpg UK
9.4L/100 km25mpg US30.1mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
3.6L/100 km65.3mpg US78.5mpg UK
5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.3s
Calculated
15.8s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
126hp/t94kW/t57hp/1000 lb
Calculated
145hp/t108kW/t66hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
266Nm/t178lb-ft/ton
Calculated
206Nm/t138lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,632km1,014mi
Calculated
704km438mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,969cc120cu in
1,591cc97cu in
Length
4,369mm172in
4,250mm167in
Width
1,783mm70in
1,805mm71in
Height
1,439mm57in
1,405mm55in
Wheelbase
2,647mm104in
2,650mm104in
Front track
1,559mm61in
1,557mm61in
Rear track
1,546mm61in
1,570mm62in
Ground clearance
144mm6in
149mm6in
Trunk volume
335L
320L
Max trunk volume
1,500L
1,015L
Doors
5
4
Seats
5
4
Fuel tank
62L
50L
CO2 emissions
99g/km
165g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Volvo V40 Facelift 2016 2.0 D4Hyundai Veloster Facelift 2015 1.6PowerTorque
  • Volvo V40 Facelift 2016 2.0 D4: Power / Torque
  • Hyundai Veloster Facelift 2015 1.6: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D44,250 rpm1,750-2,500 rpm4,500 rpm
HyundaiVelosterFacelift 20151.65,500 rpm1,500-4,500 rpm5,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricVolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4HyundaiVelosterFacelift 20151.6
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.0 s
7.6 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.4 s
8.0 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
32.8 s
42.5 s
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
214 km/h
133 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.6 s
330 ft
101 m
6.7 s
6.9 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.0 s
10.3 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.9 s
13.3 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.3 s
15.8 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
151 km/h
94 mph
146 km/h
91 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4
190 hp
142 kW
HyundaiVelosterFacelift 20151.6
186 hp
139 kW

Volvo V40 Facelift 2016 2.0 D4 has 4 hp more than Hyundai Veloster Facelift 2015 1.6.

The biggest power difference is between Hyundai Veloster Facelift 2015 1.6 and Volvo V40 Facelift 2016 2.0 D4: 4 hp (3 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
HyundaiVelosterFacelift 20151.6
265 Nm
195 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4
1,503 kg
3,314 lb
HyundaiVelosterFacelift 20151.6
1,285 kg
2,833 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4
230 km/h
143 mph
HyundaiVelosterFacelift 20151.6
214 km/h
133 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D47.4 s
HyundaiVelosterFacelift 20151.68.0 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo V40 Facelift 2016 2.0 D4 and Hyundai Veloster Facelift 2015 1.6: 0.6 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4
3.8 L/100 km
61.9 mpg US
74.3 mpg UK
HyundaiVelosterFacelift 20151.6
7.1 L/100 km
33.1 mpg US
39.8 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volvo V40 Facelift 2016 2.0 D4 and Hyundai Veloster Facelift 2015 1.6: 3.3 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4
126 hp/t
94 kW/t
7.9 kg/hp
HyundaiVelosterFacelift 20151.6
145 hp/t
108 kW/t
6.9 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4
1,632 km
1,014 mi
HyundaiVelosterFacelift 20151.6
704 km
438 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4
190 hp
142 kW
7.4 s
230 km/h
143 mph
HyundaiVelosterFacelift 20151.6
186 hp
139 kW
8.0 s
214 km/h
133 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.4 s
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
335 L
11.8 cu ft
Length
4,369 mm
172.0 in
Height
1,439 mm
56.7 in
HyundaiVelosterFacelift 20151.6
Power
186 hp
139 kW
0-100 km/h8.0 s
Top speed
214 km/h
133 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
4 seats
Trunk
320 L
11.3 cu ft
Length
4,250 mm
167.3 in
Height
1,405 mm
55.3 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.4 s
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
3.8 L/100 km
61.9 mpg US
74.3 mpg UK
HyundaiVelosterFacelift 20151.6
Power
186 hp
139 kW
0-100 km/h8.0 s
Top speed
214 km/h
133 mph
7.1 L/100 km
33.1 mpg US
39.8 mpg UK

Volvo V40 Facelift 2016 2.0 D4 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4
3.8 L/100 km
61.9 mpg US
74.3 mpg UK
7.4 s
HyundaiVelosterFacelift 20151.6
7.1 L/100 km
33.1 mpg US
39.8 mpg UK
8.0 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4
126 hp/t
94 kW/t
7.9 kg/hp
3.8 L/100 km
61.9 mpg US
74.3 mpg UK
HyundaiVelosterFacelift 20151.6
145 hp/t
108 kW/t
6.9 kg/hp
7.1 L/100 km
33.1 mpg US
39.8 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleVolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4HyundaiVelosterFacelift 20151.6
Power
190 hp
142 kW
186 hp
139 kW
Torque
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
265 Nm
195 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.4 s
8.0 s
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
214 km/h
133 mph
Lightness
1,503 kg
3,314 lb
1,285 kg
2,833 lb
Fuel consumption
3.8 L/100 km
61.9 mpg US
74.3 mpg UK
7.1 L/100 km
33.1 mpg US
39.8 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
335 L
11.8 cu ft
Length
4,369 mm
172.0 in
Height
1,439 mm
56.7 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
4 seats
Trunk
320 L
11.3 cu ft
Length
4,250 mm
167.3 in
Height
1,405 mm
55.3 in
Range score
1,632 km
1,014 mi
704 km
438 mi
CO2 score
99 g/km
165 g/km
Trunk score
335 L
11.8 cu ft
320 L
11.3 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
126 hp/t
94 kW/t
7.9 kg/hp
145 hp/t
108 kW/t
6.9 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleVolvo V40 Facelift 2016 2.0 D4Hyundai Veloster Facelift 2015 1.6
Consumption3.8 L/100 km61.9 mpg US74.3 mpg UK7.1 L/100 km33.1 mpg US39.8 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km6.65 LC100 km12.42 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi10.70 LC100 mi20.00 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used570 L151 US gal125 UK gal1,065 L281 US gal234 UK gal
Annual fuel cost997.50 LC/year1,864 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Volvo V40 Facelift 2016 2.0 D4

  • Has 4 hp more
  • Has 135 Nm more
  • Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 16 km/h (10 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 3.3 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 927 km (576 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 15 L more trunk volume
  • Emits 66 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Heaviest

Hyundai Veloster Facelift 2015 1.6

  • Is 218 kg lighter
  • Has 18 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Volvo V40 2.0 D4
Hyundai Veloster 1.6
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 D4
1.6 T4
VS
VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4vsVolvoV401.6 T4
1.6
1.6 T-GDI
VS
HyundaiVelosterFacelift 20151.6vsHyundaii30 IIFacelift 20151.6 T-GDI
2.0 D4
2.0 D4
VS
VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4vsVolvoV40 Cross CountryFacelift 20162.0 D4
1.6
1.6 DIG-T
VS
HyundaiVelosterFacelift 20151.6vsNissanPulsar (C13)1.6 DIG-T
2.0 D4
1.6 T4
VS
VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4vsVolvoV40 Cross Country1.6 T4
1.6
1.5 T-GDi
VS
HyundaiVelosterFacelift 20151.6vsHyundaii30 IIIFacelift 20201.5 T-GDi
2.0 D4
2.0 TDI
VS
VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4vsAUDIA3 Sportback (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI
1.6
2.0 TDI
VS
HyundaiVelosterFacelift 20151.6vsSeatLeon IIIFacelift 20162.0 TDI
2.0 D4
FR 2.0 TDI
VS
VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4vsSeatLeon III SCFacelift 2016FR 2.0 TDI
1.6
Cooper S 1.6
VS
HyundaiVelosterFacelift 20151.6vsMiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6
2.0 D4
2.0 TDI
VS
VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4vsAUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI
1.6
A 220d
VS
HyundaiVelosterFacelift 20151.6vsMercedes-BenzA-class (W176)Facelift 2015A 220d
Volvo V40 · Facelift 2016 2.0 D4 vs Hyundai Veloster · Facelift 2015 1.6 - car comparison - FastVsFaster