AUDI A3 (8V) · Facelift 2016
Car comparison
AUDI A3 (8V) · Facelift 2016 2.0 TDIvsVolvo V40 · Facelift 2016 2.0 D4
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo V40 · Facelift 2016
2.0 D4
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volvo V40 Facelift 2016 2.0 D4
- Most powerful190 hp142 kW
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight126 hp/t94 kW/t7.9 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption3.8 L/100 km61.9 mpg US74.3 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption4.2 L/100 km56.0 mpg US67.3 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption3.6 L/100 km65.3 mpg US78.5 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions99 g/km
- Best estimated range1,632 km1,014 mi
- Largest trunk335 L
- Best overall score58/100
- Best economy score97/100
- Best practicality score72/100
AUDI A3 (8V) Facelift 2016 2.0 TDI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.8 s
- Fastest top speed230 km/h143 mph
- Lightest1,470 kg3,241 lb
- Best performance score53/100
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI | VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 184hp137kW | 190hp142kW |
| Torque | 380Nm280lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,470kg3,241lb | 1,503kg3,314lb |
| Gross weight | 1,955kg4,310lb | 2,005kg4,420lb |
| Top speed | 230 km/h 143 mph | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 77.9s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph Calculated | 85.3s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.8s | 7.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 30.1s Calculated | 32.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.4s Calculated | 7.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5L/100 km47mpg US56.5mpg UK | 3.8L/100 km61.9mpg US74.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK | 4.2L/100 km56mpg US67.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.6L/100 km51.1mpg US61.4mpg UK | 3.6L/100 km65.3mpg US78.5mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.9s Calculated | 15.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 125hp/t93kW/t57hp/1000 lb Calculated | 126hp/t94kW/t57hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 259Nm/t173lb-ft/ton Calculated | 266Nm/t178lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,100km684mi Calculated | 1,632km1,014mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,968cc120cu in | 1,969cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,241mm167in | 4,369mm172in |
| Width | 1,777mm70in | 1,783mm70in |
| Height | 1,424mm56in | 1,439mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,602mm102in | 2,647mm104in |
| Front track | 1,543mm61in | 1,559mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,514mm60in | 1,546mm61in |
| Ground clearance | - | 144mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 325L | 335L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,060L | 1,500L |
| Doors | 3 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 55L | 62L |
| CO2 emissions | 131g/km | 99g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI A3 (8V) Facelift 2016 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
- Volvo V40 Facelift 2016 2.0 D4: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI | 3,500-4,000 rpm | 1,750-3,250 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4 | 4,250 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 4,500 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI | VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.4 s | 7.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.8 s | 7.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 30.1 s | 32.8 s |
| Top speed | 230 km/h 143 mph | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.4 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.7 s | 10.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.5 s | 12.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.9 s | 15.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 155 km/h 96 mph | 151 km/h 94 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI | 184 hp 137 kW |
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4 | 190 hp 142 kW |
Volvo V40 Facelift 2016 2.0 D4 has 6 hp more than AUDI A3 (8V) Facelift 2016 2.0 TDI.
The biggest power difference is between AUDI A3 (8V) Facelift 2016 2.0 TDI and Volvo V40 Facelift 2016 2.0 D4: 6 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft |
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI | 1,470 kg 3,241 lb |
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4 | 1,503 kg 3,314 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4 | 230 km/h 143 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI | 6.8 s |
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4 | 7.4 s |
Although Volvo V40 Facelift 2016 2.0 D4 has more power, AUDI A3 (8V) Facelift 2016 2.0 TDI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI A3 (8V) Facelift 2016 2.0 TDI and Volvo V40 Facelift 2016 2.0 D4: 0.6 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI | 5.0 L/100 km 47.0 mpg US 56.5 mpg UK |
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4 | 3.8 L/100 km 61.9 mpg US 74.3 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volvo V40 Facelift 2016 2.0 D4 and AUDI A3 (8V) Facelift 2016 2.0 TDI: 1.2 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI | 125 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp |
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4 | 126 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI | 1,100 km 684 mi |
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4 | 1,632 km 1,014 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI | 184 hp 137 kW | 6.8 s | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4 | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.4 s | 230 km/h 143 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI |
| 5.0 L/100 km 47.0 mpg US 56.5 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4 |
| 3.8 L/100 km 61.9 mpg US 74.3 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI A3 (8V) Facelift 2016 2.0 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI | 5.0 L/100 km 47.0 mpg US 56.5 mpg UK | 6.8 s |
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4 | 3.8 L/100 km 61.9 mpg US 74.3 mpg UK | 7.4 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI | 125 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp | 5.0 L/100 km 47.0 mpg US 56.5 mpg UK |
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4 | 126 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp | 3.8 L/100 km 61.9 mpg US 74.3 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI | VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 184 hp 137 kW | 190 hp 142 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.8 s | 7.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 230 km/h 143 mph | 230 km/h 143 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,470 kg 3,241 lb | 1,503 kg 3,314 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.0 L/100 km 47.0 mpg US 56.5 mpg UK | 3.8 L/100 km 61.9 mpg US 74.3 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,100 km 684 mi | 1,632 km 1,014 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 131 g/km | 99 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 325 L 11.5 cu ft | 335 L 11.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 125 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp | 126 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI A3 (8V) Facelift 2016 2.0 TDI | Volvo V40 Facelift 2016 2.0 D4 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5 L/100 km47 mpg US56.5 mpg UK | 3.8 L/100 km61.9 mpg US74.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 8.75 LC100 km | 6.65 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 14.08 LC100 mi | 10.70 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 750 L198 US gal165 UK gal | 570 L151 US gal125 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,313 LC/year | 997.50 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI A3 (8V) Facelift 2016 2.0 TDI
- Is 33 kg lighter
- Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Volvo V40 Facelift 2016 2.0 D4
- Has 6 hp more
- Has 20 Nm more
- Uses 1.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 1 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 532 km (330 mi) more estimated range
- Has 10 L more trunk volume
- Emits 32 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























