Car comparison

Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4vsHyundai Santa Fe III (DM) · Facelift 2015 2.2 CRDi

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Volvo XC60 II

2.0 D4

190 hp1969 ccDieselAWDAutomaticTwin-turboSUV2017-2018
VS

Hyundai Santa Fe III (DM) · Facelift 2015

2.2 CRDi

200 hp2199 ccDieselAWDManualTurbochargedSUV2015-2018

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    8.4 s
  • Fastest top speed
    205 km/h
    127 mph
  • Lightest
    1,958 kg
    4,317 lb
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    5.8 L/100 km
    40.6 mpg US
    48.7 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    6.6 L/100 km
    35.6 mpg US
    42.8 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    5.3 L/100 km
    44.4 mpg US
    53.3 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    153 g/km
  • Best overall score
    58/100
  • Best performance score
    45/100
  • Best economy score
    91/100
  • Best practicality score
    85/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelVolvoXC60 II2.0 D4HyundaiSanta Fe III (DM)Facelift 20152.2 CRDi
Power
190hp142kW
200hp149kW
Torque
400Nm295lb-ft
440Nm325lb-ft
Curb weight
1,958kg4,317lb
1,977kg4,359lb
Gross weight
2,450kg5,401lb
2,600kg5,732lb
Top speed
205 km/h
127 mph
203 km/h
126 mph
To 99% top speed
88.1s99% target: 203 km/h / 126 mph
Calculated
93.7s99% target: 201 km/h / 125 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
8.4s
9.0s
0-200 km/h
67.8s
Calculated
84.1s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.9s
Calculated
8.5s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK
6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK
7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK
5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK
Quarter mile
16.1s
Calculated
16.5s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
97hp/t72kW/t44hp/1000 lb
Calculated
101hp/t75kW/t46hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
204Nm/t137lb-ft/ton
Calculated
223Nm/t149lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,034km643mi
Calculated
1,067km663mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,969cc120cu in
2,199cc134cu in
Length
4,688mm185in
4,690mm185in
Width
1,902mm75in
1,880mm74in
Height
1,658mm65in
1,680mm66in
Wheelbase
2,865mm113in
2,700mm106in
Front track
1,668mm66in
1,633mm64in
Rear track
1,673mm66in
1,644mm65in
Ground clearance
216mm9in
185mm7in
Trunk volume
505L
516L
Max trunk volume
1,432L
1,615L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
7
Fuel tank
60L
64L
CO2 emissions
153g/km
159g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4Hyundai Santa Fe III (DM) Facelift 2015 2.2 CRDiPowerTorque
  • Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4: Power / Torque
  • Hyundai Santa Fe III (DM) Facelift 2015 2.2 CRDi: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D44,250 rpm1,750-2,500 rpm4,500 rpm
HyundaiSanta Fe III (DM)Facelift 20152.2 CRDi3,800 rpm1,750-2,750 rpm4,050 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricVolvoXC60 II2.0 D4HyundaiSanta Fe III (DM)Facelift 20152.2 CRDi
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.9 s
8.5 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
8.4 s
9.0 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
67.8 s
84.1 s
Top speed
205 km/h
127 mph
203 km/h
126 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.6 s
330 ft
101 m
6.9 s
7.0 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.4 s
10.7 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.5 s
13.9 s
1/4 mile
402 m
16.1 s
16.5 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
140 km/h
87 mph
136 km/h
85 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4
190 hp
142 kW
HyundaiSanta Fe III (DM)Facelift 20152.2 CRDi
200 hp
149 kW

Hyundai Santa Fe III (DM) Facelift 2015 2.2 CRDi has 10 hp more than Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4.

The biggest power difference is between Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4 and Hyundai Santa Fe III (DM) Facelift 2015 2.2 CRDi: 10 hp (7 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
HyundaiSanta Fe III (DM)Facelift 20152.2 CRDi
440 Nm
325 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4
1,958 kg
4,317 lb
HyundaiSanta Fe III (DM)Facelift 20152.2 CRDi
1,977 kg
4,359 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4
205 km/h
127 mph
HyundaiSanta Fe III (DM)Facelift 20152.2 CRDi
203 km/h
126 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D48.4 s
HyundaiSanta Fe III (DM)Facelift 20152.2 CRDi9.0 s

Although Hyundai Santa Fe III (DM) Facelift 2015 2.2 CRDi has more power, Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4 and Hyundai Santa Fe III (DM) Facelift 2015 2.2 CRDi: 0.6 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4
5.8 L/100 km
40.6 mpg US
48.7 mpg UK
HyundaiSanta Fe III (DM)Facelift 20152.2 CRDi
6.0 L/100 km
39.2 mpg US
47.1 mpg UK

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4
97 hp/t
72 kW/t
10.3 kg/hp
HyundaiSanta Fe III (DM)Facelift 20152.2 CRDi
101 hp/t
75 kW/t
9.9 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4
1,034 km
643 mi
HyundaiSanta Fe III (DM)Facelift 20152.2 CRDi
1,067 km
663 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4
190 hp
142 kW
8.4 s
205 km/h
127 mph
HyundaiSanta Fe III (DM)Facelift 20152.2 CRDi
200 hp
149 kW
9.0 s
203 km/h
126 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h8.4 s
Top speed
205 km/h
127 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Length
4,688 mm
184.6 in
Height
1,658 mm
65.3 in
HyundaiSanta Fe III (DM)Facelift 20152.2 CRDi
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h9.0 s
Top speed
203 km/h
126 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
7 seats
Trunk
516 L
18.2 cu ft
Length
4,690 mm
184.6 in
Height
1,680 mm
66.1 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h8.4 s
Top speed
205 km/h
127 mph
5.8 L/100 km
40.6 mpg US
48.7 mpg UK
HyundaiSanta Fe III (DM)Facelift 20152.2 CRDi
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h9.0 s
Top speed
203 km/h
126 mph
6.0 L/100 km
39.2 mpg US
47.1 mpg UK

Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4
5.8 L/100 km
40.6 mpg US
48.7 mpg UK
8.4 s
HyundaiSanta Fe III (DM)Facelift 20152.2 CRDi
6.0 L/100 km
39.2 mpg US
47.1 mpg UK
9.0 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4
97 hp/t
72 kW/t
10.3 kg/hp
5.8 L/100 km
40.6 mpg US
48.7 mpg UK
HyundaiSanta Fe III (DM)Facelift 20152.2 CRDi
101 hp/t
75 kW/t
9.9 kg/hp
6.0 L/100 km
39.2 mpg US
47.1 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleVolvoXC60 II2.0 D4HyundaiSanta Fe III (DM)Facelift 20152.2 CRDi
Power
190 hp
142 kW
200 hp
149 kW
Torque
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
440 Nm
325 lb-ft
Acceleration
8.4 s
9.0 s
Top speed
205 km/h
127 mph
203 km/h
126 mph
Lightness
1,958 kg
4,317 lb
1,977 kg
4,359 lb
Fuel consumption
5.8 L/100 km
40.6 mpg US
48.7 mpg UK
6.0 L/100 km
39.2 mpg US
47.1 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Length
4,688 mm
184.6 in
Height
1,658 mm
65.3 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
7 seats
Trunk
516 L
18.2 cu ft
Length
4,690 mm
184.6 in
Height
1,680 mm
66.1 in
Range score
1,034 km
643 mi
1,067 km
663 mi
CO2 score
153 g/km
159 g/km
Trunk score
505 L
17.8 cu ft
516 L
18.2 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
97 hp/t
72 kW/t
10.3 kg/hp
101 hp/t
75 kW/t
9.9 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleVolvo XC60 II 2.0 D4Hyundai Santa Fe III (DM) Facelift 2015 2.2 CRDi
Consumption5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK6 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km10.15 LC100 km10.50 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi16.33 LC100 mi16.90 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used870 L230 US gal191 UK gal900 L238 US gal198 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,523 LC/year1,575 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4

  • Is 19 kg lighter
  • Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 0.2 L/100 km less fuel
  • Emits 6 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Smallest trunk

Hyundai Santa Fe III (DM) Facelift 2015 2.2 CRDi

  • Has 10 hp more
  • Has 40 Nm more
  • Has 4 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 32 km (20 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 11 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4
Hyundai Santa Fe III (DM) 2.2 CRDi
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 D4
2.0 T4
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4vsVolvoXC402.0 T4
2.2 CRDi
2.2 CRDi
VS
HyundaiSanta Fe III (DM)Facelift 20152.2 CRDivsHyundaiSanta Fe IV (TM)Facelift 20202.2 CRDi
2.0 D4
2.0 D5
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4vsVolvoXC90 II2.0 D5
2.2 CRDi
1.6T
VS
HyundaiSanta Fe III (DM)Facelift 20152.2 CRDivsHyundaiKona II1.6T
2.0 D4
2.0d
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4vsJaguarF-Pace2.0d
2.2 CRDi
2.0 D4
VS
HyundaiSanta Fe III (DM)Facelift 20152.2 CRDivsVolvoXC60 II2.0 D4
2.0 D4
2.0 TDI
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4vsVolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TDI
2.0 D4
2.0 TDI
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4vsAUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TDI
2.0 D4
Cooper SD 2.0
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4vsMiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0
2.0 D4
2.2d
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4vsAlfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2d
2.2 CRDi
20d
VS
HyundaiSanta Fe III (DM)Facelift 20152.2 CRDivsBMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201420d
2.0 D4
2.0 TDI
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4vsSeatTarraco2.0 TDI
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4 vs Hyundai Santa Fe III (DM) · Facelift 2015 2.2 CRDi - car comparison - FastVsFaster