Maserati Grecale · Facelift 2026
Car comparison
Maserati Grecale · Facelift 2026 Modena 2.0vsHyptec HL 108.35 kWh
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonHyptec HL
108.35 kWh
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Maserati Grecale Facelift 2026 Modena 2.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.3 s
- Fastest top speed250 km/h155 mph Unrestricted240 km/h149 mph Restricted
- Highest torque450 Nm332 lb-ft
- Lightest1,895 kg4,178 lb
- Best power-to-weight174 hp/t130 kW/t5.7 kg/hp
- Best overall score72/100
- Best performance score66/100
- Best economy score82/100
Hyptec HL 108.35 kWh
- Most powerful340 hp254 kW
- Best practicality score91/100
Specification comparison
| Model | MaseratiGrecaleFacelift 2026Modena 2.0 | HyptecHL108.35 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 330hp246kW | 340hp254kW |
| Torque | 450Nm332lb-ft | 430Nm317lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,895kg4,178lb | 2,500kg5,512lb |
| Gross weight | - | 3,050kg6,724lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Calculated | 201 km/h 125 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 64.1s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph Calculated | 61.0s99% target: 199 km/h / 124 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.3s | 6.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 19.5s Calculated | 72.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.0s Calculated | 6.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.3L/100 km25.3mpg US30.4mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 13.4s Calculated | 14.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 174hp/t130kW/t79hp/1000 lb Calculated | 136hp/t101kW/t62hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 237Nm/t159lb-ft/ton Calculated | 172Nm/t115lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 688km428mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 1,995cc122cu in | - |
| Length | 4,873mm192in | 5,126mm202in |
| Width | 1,947mm77in | 1,990mm78in |
| Height | 1,687mm66in | 1,750mm69in |
| Wheelbase | 2,901mm114in | 3,088mm122in |
| Front track | 1,620mm64in | 1,665mm66in |
| Rear track | 1,692mm67in | 1,678mm66in |
| Trunk volume | 535L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 64L | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | MaseratiGrecaleFacelift 2026Modena 2.0 | HyptecHL108.35 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.0 s | 6.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.3 s | 6.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 19.5 s | 72.0 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Likely limited | 201 km/h 125 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.9 s | 6.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.8 s | 9.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.3 s | 12.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.4 s | 14.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 172 km/h 107 mph | 150 km/h 93 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiGrecaleFacelift 2026Modena 2.0 | 330 hp 246 kW |
| HyptecHL108.35 kWh | 340 hp 254 kW |
Hyptec HL 108.35 kWh has 10 hp more than Maserati Grecale Facelift 2026 Modena 2.0.
The biggest power difference is between Maserati Grecale Facelift 2026 Modena 2.0 and Hyptec HL 108.35 kWh: 10 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiGrecaleFacelift 2026Modena 2.0 | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft |
| HyptecHL108.35 kWh | 430 Nm 317 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiGrecaleFacelift 2026Modena 2.0 | 1,895 kg 4,178 lb |
| HyptecHL108.35 kWh | 2,500 kg 5,512 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiGrecaleFacelift 2026Modena 2.0 | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
| HyptecHL108.35 kWh | 201 km/h 125 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiGrecaleFacelift 2026Modena 2.0 | 5.3 s |
| HyptecHL108.35 kWh | 6.5 s |
Although Hyptec HL 108.35 kWh has more power, Maserati Grecale Facelift 2026 Modena 2.0 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Maserati Grecale Facelift 2026 Modena 2.0 and Hyptec HL 108.35 kWh: 1.2 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiGrecaleFacelift 2026Modena 2.0 | 174 hp/t 130 kW/t 5.7 kg/hp |
| HyptecHL108.35 kWh | 136 hp/t 101 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MaseratiGrecaleFacelift 2026Modena 2.0 | 330 hp 246 kW | 5.3 s | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
| HyptecHL108.35 kWh | 340 hp 254 kW | 6.5 s | 201 km/h 125 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MaseratiGrecaleFacelift 2026Modena 2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| HyptecHL108.35 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | MaseratiGrecaleFacelift 2026Modena 2.0 | HyptecHL108.35 kWh | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 330 hp 246 kW | 340 hp 254 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft | 430 Nm 317 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.3 s | 6.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph | 201 km/h 125 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,895 kg 4,178 lb | 2,500 kg 5,512 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.3 L/100 km 25.3 mpg US 30.4 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 688 km 428 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 535 L 18.9 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 174 hp/t 130 kW/t 5.7 kg/hp | 136 hp/t 101 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Maserati Grecale Facelift 2026 Modena 2.0 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.3 L/100 km25.3 mpg US30.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 16.28 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 26.19 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,395 L369 US gal307 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,441 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Maserati Grecale Facelift 2026 Modena 2.0
- Has 20 Nm more
- Is 605 kg lighter
- Is 1.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 49 km/h (30 mph) higher top speed
- Has 38 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
Hyptec HL 108.35 kWh
- Has 10 hp more
Pros
- Most powerful
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























