HSV Clubsport (VE)
Car comparison
HSV Clubsport (VE) R8 6.0 V8vsVolkswagen Phaeton 6.0 W12 48V
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolkswagen Phaeton
6.0 W12 48V
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
HSV Clubsport (VE) R8 6.0 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.9 s
- Fastest top speed288 km/h179 mph
- Highest torque550 Nm406 lb-ft
- Lightest1,850 kg4,079 lb
- Best power-to-weight226 hp/t168 kW/t4.4 kg/hp
- Best overall score76/100
- Best performance score77/100
Volkswagen Phaeton 6.0 W12 48V
- Most powerful420 hp313 kW
- Largest trunk500 L
- Best economy score65/100
- Best practicality score76/100
Specification comparison
| Model | HSVClubsport (VE)R8 6.0 V8 | VolkswagenPhaeton6.0 W12 48V |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 418hp312kW | 420hp313kW |
| Torque | 550Nm406lb-ft | 550Nm406lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,850kg4,079lb | 2,300kg5,071lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,850kg6,283lb |
| Top speed | 288 km/h 179 mph | 285 km/h 177 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 54.4s99% target: 285 km/h / 177 mph Calculated | 73.1s99% target: 282 km/h / 175 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.9s | 6.1s |
| 0-200 km/h | 13.8s Calculated | 18.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.7s Calculated | 5.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 15.6L/100 km15.1mpg US18.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 23.9L/100 km9.8mpg US11.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 10.9L/100 km21.6mpg US25.9mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.7s Calculated | 14.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 226hp/t168kW/t102hp/1000 lb Calculated | 183hp/t136kW/t83hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 297Nm/t199lb-ft/ton Calculated | 239Nm/t160lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 577km358mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 5,967cc364cu in | 5,998cc366cu in |
| Length | 4,943mm195in | 5,055mm199in |
| Width | 1,899mm75in | 1,903mm75in |
| Height | 1,467mm58in | 1,450mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,915mm115in | 2,881mm113in |
| Front track | 1,592mm63in | 1,628mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,590mm63in | 1,612mm63in |
| Trunk volume | 496L | 500L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 73L | 90L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- HSV Clubsport (VE) R8 6.0 V8: Power / Torque
- Volkswagen Phaeton 6.0 W12 48V: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| HSVClubsport (VE)R8 6.0 V8 | 6,000 rpm | 4,400 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| VolkswagenPhaeton6.0 W12 48V | 6,000 rpm | 3,500 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | HSVClubsport (VE)R8 6.0 V8 | VolkswagenPhaeton6.0 W12 48V |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.7 s | 5.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.9 s | 6.1 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 13.8 s | 18.0 s |
| Top speed | 288 km/h 179 mph | 285 km/h 177 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.8 s | 6.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.5 s | 9.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.8 s | 11.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.7 s | 14.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 192 km/h 119 mph | 175 km/h 109 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HSVClubsport (VE)R8 6.0 V8 | 418 hp 312 kW |
| VolkswagenPhaeton6.0 W12 48V | 420 hp 313 kW |
Volkswagen Phaeton 6.0 W12 48V has 2 hp more than HSV Clubsport (VE) R8 6.0 V8.
The biggest power difference is between HSV Clubsport (VE) R8 6.0 V8 and Volkswagen Phaeton 6.0 W12 48V: 2 hp (1 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HSVClubsport (VE)R8 6.0 V8 | 550 Nm 406 lb-ft |
| VolkswagenPhaeton6.0 W12 48V | 550 Nm 406 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HSVClubsport (VE)R8 6.0 V8 | 1,850 kg 4,079 lb |
| VolkswagenPhaeton6.0 W12 48V | 2,300 kg 5,071 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HSVClubsport (VE)R8 6.0 V8 | 288 km/h 179 mph |
| VolkswagenPhaeton6.0 W12 48V | 285 km/h 177 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HSVClubsport (VE)R8 6.0 V8 | 4.9 s |
| VolkswagenPhaeton6.0 W12 48V | 6.1 s |
Although Volkswagen Phaeton 6.0 W12 48V has more power, HSV Clubsport (VE) R8 6.0 V8 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between HSV Clubsport (VE) R8 6.0 V8 and Volkswagen Phaeton 6.0 W12 48V: 1.2 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HSVClubsport (VE)R8 6.0 V8 | 226 hp/t 168 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp |
| VolkswagenPhaeton6.0 W12 48V | 183 hp/t 136 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| HSVClubsport (VE)R8 6.0 V8 | 418 hp 312 kW | 4.9 s | 288 km/h 179 mph |
| VolkswagenPhaeton6.0 W12 48V | 420 hp 313 kW | 6.1 s | 285 km/h 177 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HSVClubsport (VE)R8 6.0 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolkswagenPhaeton6.0 W12 48V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | HSVClubsport (VE)R8 6.0 V8 | VolkswagenPhaeton6.0 W12 48V | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 418 hp 312 kW | 420 hp 313 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 550 Nm 406 lb-ft | 550 Nm 406 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.9 s | 6.1 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 288 km/h 179 mph | 285 km/h 177 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,850 kg 4,079 lb | 2,300 kg 5,071 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 15.6 L/100 km 15.1 mpg US 18.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 577 km 358 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 496 L 17.5 cu ft | 500 L 17.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 226 hp/t 168 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp | 183 hp/t 136 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volkswagen Phaeton 6.0 W12 48V |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 15.6 L/100 km15.1 mpg US18.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 27.30 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 43.94 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 2,340 L618 US gal515 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 4,095 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
HSV Clubsport (VE) R8 6.0 V8
- Is 450 kg lighter
- Is 1.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 3 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Has 43 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Volkswagen Phaeton 6.0 W12 48V
- Has 2 hp more
- Has 4 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























