Bentley Arnage T
Car comparison
Bentley Arnage T 6.75 i V8 BiturbovsVolkswagen Phaeton 6.0 W12 48V
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolkswagen Phaeton
6.0 W12 48V
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volkswagen Phaeton 6.0 W12 48V
- Lightest2,300 kg5,071 lb
- Best power-to-weight183 hp/t136 kW/t5.5 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption15.6 L/100 km15.1 mpg US18.1 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption23.9 L/100 km9.8 mpg US11.8 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption10.9 L/100 km21.6 mpg US25.9 mpg UK
- Best estimated range577 km358 mi
- Largest trunk500 L
- Best economy score65/100
- Best practicality score76/100
Bentley Arnage T 6.75 i V8 Biturbo
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.8 s
- Fastest top speed285 km/h177 mph Unrestricted270 km/h168 mph Restricted
- Most powerful457 hp341 kW
- Highest torque875 Nm645 lb-ft
- Best overall score75/100
- Best performance score77/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BentleyArnage T6.75 i V8 Biturbo | VolkswagenPhaeton6.0 W12 48V |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 457hp341kW | 420hp313kW |
| Torque | 875Nm645lb-ft | 550Nm406lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,585kg5,699lb | 2,300kg5,071lb |
| Gross weight | 2,970kg6,548lb | 2,850kg6,283lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 285 km/h177 mph Restricted 270 km/h168 mph Calculated | 285 km/h 177 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 73.5s99% target: 282 km/h / 175 mph Calculated | 73.1s99% target: 282 km/h / 175 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.8s | 6.1s |
| 0-200 km/h | 17.5s Calculated | 18.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.5s Calculated | 5.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 20.6L/100 km11.4mpg US13.7mpg UK | 15.6L/100 km15.1mpg US18.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 30.7L/100 km7.7mpg US9.2mpg UK | 23.9L/100 km9.8mpg US11.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 14.8L/100 km15.9mpg US19.1mpg UK | 10.9L/100 km21.6mpg US25.9mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.7s Calculated | 14.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 177hp/t132kW/t80hp/1000 lb Calculated | 183hp/t136kW/t83hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 338Nm/t226lb-ft/ton Calculated | 239Nm/t160lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 485km302mi Calculated | 577km358mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 6,750cc412cu in | 5,998cc366cu in |
| Length | 5,400mm213in | 5,055mm199in |
| Width | 1,932mm76in | 1,903mm75in |
| Height | 1,515mm60in | 1,450mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 3,116mm123in | 2,881mm113in |
| Front track | 1,602mm63in | 1,628mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,602mm63in | 1,612mm63in |
| Trunk volume | 375L | 500L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 100L | 90L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Bentley Arnage T 6.75 i V8 Biturbo: Power / Torque
- Volkswagen Phaeton 6.0 W12 48V: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyArnage T6.75 i V8 Biturbo | 4,100 rpm | 3,250 rpm | 4,350 rpm |
| VolkswagenPhaeton6.0 W12 48V | 6,000 rpm | 3,500 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BentleyArnage T6.75 i V8 Biturbo | VolkswagenPhaeton6.0 W12 48V |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.5 s | 5.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.8 s | 6.1 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 17.5 s | 18.0 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 285 km/h177 mph Restricted 270 km/h168 mph Likely limited | 285 km/h 177 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.2 s | 6.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.2 s | 9.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.7 s | 11.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.7 s | 14.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 176 km/h 110 mph | 175 km/h 109 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyArnage T6.75 i V8 Biturbo | 457 hp 341 kW |
| VolkswagenPhaeton6.0 W12 48V | 420 hp 313 kW |
Bentley Arnage T 6.75 i V8 Biturbo has 37 hp more than Volkswagen Phaeton 6.0 W12 48V.
The biggest power difference is between Volkswagen Phaeton 6.0 W12 48V and Bentley Arnage T 6.75 i V8 Biturbo: 37 hp (28 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyArnage T6.75 i V8 Biturbo | 875 Nm 645 lb-ft |
| VolkswagenPhaeton6.0 W12 48V | 550 Nm 406 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyArnage T6.75 i V8 Biturbo | 2,585 kg 5,699 lb |
| VolkswagenPhaeton6.0 W12 48V | 2,300 kg 5,071 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyArnage T6.75 i V8 Biturbo | Unrestricted 285 km/h177 mph Restricted 270 km/h168 mph |
| VolkswagenPhaeton6.0 W12 48V | 285 km/h 177 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyArnage T6.75 i V8 Biturbo | 5.8 s |
| VolkswagenPhaeton6.0 W12 48V | 6.1 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Bentley Arnage T 6.75 i V8 Biturbo and Volkswagen Phaeton 6.0 W12 48V: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyArnage T6.75 i V8 Biturbo | 20.6 L/100 km 11.4 mpg US 13.7 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenPhaeton6.0 W12 48V | 15.6 L/100 km 15.1 mpg US 18.1 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volkswagen Phaeton 6.0 W12 48V and Bentley Arnage T 6.75 i V8 Biturbo: 5.0 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyArnage T6.75 i V8 Biturbo | 177 hp/t 132 kW/t 5.7 kg/hp |
| VolkswagenPhaeton6.0 W12 48V | 183 hp/t 136 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyArnage T6.75 i V8 Biturbo | 485 km 302 mi |
| VolkswagenPhaeton6.0 W12 48V | 577 km 358 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyArnage T6.75 i V8 Biturbo | 457 hp 341 kW | 5.8 s | Unrestricted 285 km/h177 mph Restricted 270 km/h168 mph |
| VolkswagenPhaeton6.0 W12 48V | 420 hp 313 kW | 6.1 s | 285 km/h 177 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyArnage T6.75 i V8 Biturbo |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolkswagenPhaeton6.0 W12 48V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyArnage T6.75 i V8 Biturbo |
| 20.6 L/100 km 11.4 mpg US 13.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolkswagenPhaeton6.0 W12 48V |
| 15.6 L/100 km 15.1 mpg US 18.1 mpg UK | ||||||
Volkswagen Phaeton 6.0 W12 48V is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BentleyArnage T6.75 i V8 Biturbo | 20.6 L/100 km 11.4 mpg US 13.7 mpg UK | 5.8 s |
| VolkswagenPhaeton6.0 W12 48V | 15.6 L/100 km 15.1 mpg US 18.1 mpg UK | 6.1 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BentleyArnage T6.75 i V8 Biturbo | 177 hp/t 132 kW/t 5.7 kg/hp | 20.6 L/100 km 11.4 mpg US 13.7 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenPhaeton6.0 W12 48V | 183 hp/t 136 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp | 15.6 L/100 km 15.1 mpg US 18.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BentleyArnage T6.75 i V8 Biturbo | VolkswagenPhaeton6.0 W12 48V | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 457 hp 341 kW | 420 hp 313 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 875 Nm 645 lb-ft | 550 Nm 406 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.8 s | 6.1 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 285 km/h177 mph Restricted 270 km/h168 mph | 285 km/h 177 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,585 kg 5,699 lb | 2,300 kg 5,071 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 20.6 L/100 km 11.4 mpg US 13.7 mpg UK | 15.6 L/100 km 15.1 mpg US 18.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 485 km 302 mi | 577 km 358 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 375 L 13.2 cu ft | 500 L 17.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 177 hp/t 132 kW/t 5.7 kg/hp | 183 hp/t 136 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Bentley Arnage T 6.75 i V8 Biturbo | Volkswagen Phaeton 6.0 W12 48V |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 20.6 L/100 km11.4 mpg US13.7 mpg UK | 15.6 L/100 km15.1 mpg US18.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 36.05 LC100 km | 27.30 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 58.02 LC100 mi | 43.94 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 3,090 L816 US gal680 UK gal | 2,340 L618 US gal515 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 5,408 LC/year | 4,095 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Bentley Arnage T 6.75 i V8 Biturbo
- Has 37 hp more
- Has 325 Nm more
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Volkswagen Phaeton 6.0 W12 48V
- Is 285 kg lighter
- Uses 5.0 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 6 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 91 km (57 mi) more estimated range
- Has 125 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























