Hongqi HS7 II
Car comparison
Hongqi HS7 II 2.0TvsSeat Tarraco 2.0 TSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonSeat Tarraco
2.0 TSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Hongqi HS7 II 2.0T
- Fastest top speed230 km/h143 mph
- Most powerful252 hp188 kW
- Highest torque380 Nm280 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK
- Best economy score86/100
- Best practicality score90/100
Seat Tarraco 2.0 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.2 s
- Lightest1,698 kg3,743 lb
- Best power-to-weight144 hp/t108 kW/t6.9 kg/hp
- Best overall score67/100
- Best performance score57/100
Specification comparison
| Model | HongqiHS7 II2.0T | SeatTarraco2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 252hp188kW | 245hp183kW |
| Torque | 380Nm280lb-ft | 370Nm273lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,985kg4,376lb | 1,698kg3,743lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,440kg5,379lb |
| Top speed | 230 km/h 143 mph | 229 km/h 142 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 105.4s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph Calculated | 67.9s99% target: 227 km/h / 141 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.5s | 6.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 39.4s Calculated | 27.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 8.0s Calculated | 5.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK | 9.2L/100 km25.6mpg US30.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.1s Calculated | 14.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 127hp/t95kW/t58hp/1000 lb Calculated | 144hp/t108kW/t65hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 191Nm/t128lb-ft/ton Calculated | 218Nm/t146lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 652km405mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,989cc121cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,995mm197in | 4,735mm186in |
| Width | 1,960mm77in | 1,839mm72in |
| Height | 1,760mm69in | 1,674mm66in |
| Wheelbase | 2,920mm115in | 2,790mm110in |
| Front track | - | 1,585mm62in |
| Rear track | - | 1,574mm62in |
| Max trunk volume | - | 700L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 6 | 7 |
| Fuel tank | - | 60L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | HongqiHS7 II2.0T | SeatTarraco2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.0 s | 5.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.5 s | 6.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 39.4 s | 27.0 s |
| Top speed | 230 km/h 143 mph | 229 km/h 142 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.0 s | 6.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.5 s | 9.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.6 s | 12.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.1 s | 14.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 143 km/h 89 mph | 159 km/h 99 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HongqiHS7 II2.0T | 252 hp 188 kW |
| SeatTarraco2.0 TSI | 245 hp 183 kW |
Hongqi HS7 II 2.0T has 7 hp more than Seat Tarraco 2.0 TSI.
The biggest power difference is between Seat Tarraco 2.0 TSI and Hongqi HS7 II 2.0T: 7 hp (5 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HongqiHS7 II2.0T | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft |
| SeatTarraco2.0 TSI | 370 Nm 273 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HongqiHS7 II2.0T | 1,985 kg 4,376 lb |
| SeatTarraco2.0 TSI | 1,698 kg 3,743 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HongqiHS7 II2.0T | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| SeatTarraco2.0 TSI | 229 km/h 142 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HongqiHS7 II2.0T | 8.5 s |
| SeatTarraco2.0 TSI | 6.2 s |
Although Hongqi HS7 II 2.0T has more power, Seat Tarraco 2.0 TSI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Seat Tarraco 2.0 TSI and Hongqi HS7 II 2.0T: 2.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HongqiHS7 II2.0T | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK |
| SeatTarraco2.0 TSI | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Hongqi HS7 II 2.0T and Seat Tarraco 2.0 TSI: 1.5 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HongqiHS7 II2.0T | 127 hp/t 95 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp |
| SeatTarraco2.0 TSI | 144 hp/t 108 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| HongqiHS7 II2.0T | 252 hp 188 kW | 8.5 s | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| SeatTarraco2.0 TSI | 245 hp 183 kW | 6.2 s | 229 km/h 142 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HongqiHS7 II2.0T |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| SeatTarraco2.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HongqiHS7 II2.0T |
| 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| SeatTarraco2.0 TSI |
| 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK | ||||||
Seat Tarraco 2.0 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| HongqiHS7 II2.0T | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | 8.5 s |
| SeatTarraco2.0 TSI | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK | 6.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| HongqiHS7 II2.0T | 127 hp/t 95 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK |
| SeatTarraco2.0 TSI | 144 hp/t 108 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | HongqiHS7 II2.0T | SeatTarraco2.0 TSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 252 hp 188 kW | 245 hp 183 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft | 370 Nm 273 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.5 s | 6.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 230 km/h 143 mph | 229 km/h 142 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,985 kg 4,376 lb | 1,698 kg 3,743 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 652 km 405 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | - | 700 L 24.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 127 hp/t 95 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp | 144 hp/t 108 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Hongqi HS7 II 2.0T | Seat Tarraco 2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK | 9.2 L/100 km25.6 mpg US30.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 13.48 LC100 km | 16.10 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 21.69 LC100 mi | 25.91 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,155 L305 US gal254 UK gal | 1,380 L365 US gal304 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,021 LC/year | 2,415 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Hongqi HS7 II 2.0T
- Has 7 hp more
- Has 10 Nm more
- Has 1 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.5 L/100 km less fuel
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
Seat Tarraco 2.0 TSI
- Is 287 kg lighter
- Is 2.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 17 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























