Car comparison

Skoda Octavia II · Facelift 2009 RS 2.0 TSIvsHonda Civic Type R (FN2) 2.0

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Skoda Octavia II · Facelift 2009

RS 2.0 TSI

200 hp1984 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticTurbochargedHatchback2009-2013
VS

Honda Civic Type R (FN2)

2.0

201 hp1998 ccGasolineFWDManualNaturally aspiratedHatchback2007-2011

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Skoda Octavia II Facelift 2009 RS 2.0 TSI

  • Fastest top speed
    238 km/h
    148 mph
  • Highest torque
    280 Nm
    207 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    7.7 L/100 km
    30.5 mpg US
    36.7 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    10.4 L/100 km
    22.6 mpg US
    27.2 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    6.2 L/100 km
    37.9 mpg US
    45.6 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    714 km
    444 mi
  • Largest trunk
    585 L
  • Best overall score
    61/100
  • Best economy score
    86/100
  • Best practicality score
    82/100

Honda Civic Type R (FN2) 2.0

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.6 s
  • Most powerful
    201 hp
    150 kW
  • Lightest
    1,267 kg
    2,793 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    159 hp/t
    118 kW/t
    6.3 kg/hp
  • Best performance score
    53/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelSkodaOctavia IIFacelift 2009RS 2.0 TSIHondaCivic Type R (FN2)2.0
Power
200hp149kW
201hp150kW
Torque
280Nm207lb-ft
193Nm142lb-ft
Curb weight
1,470kg3,241lb
1,267kg2,793lb
Gross weight
1,950kg4,299lb
1,700kg3,748lb
Top speed
238 km/h
148 mph
235 km/h
146 mph
To 99% top speed
87.9s99% target: 236 km/h / 146 mph
Calculated
71.6s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.5s
6.6s
0-200 km/h
30.4s
Calculated
26.5s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.1s
Calculated
6.3s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK
9.1L/100 km25.8mpg US31.0mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
10.4L/100 km22.6mpg US27.2mpg UK
12.7L/100 km18.5mpg US22.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK
7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.4s
Calculated
14.7s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
136hp/t101kW/t62hp/1000 lb
Calculated
159hp/t118kW/t72hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
190Nm/t127lb-ft/ton
Calculated
152Nm/t102lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
714km444mi
Calculated
549km341mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,984cc121cu in
1,998cc122cu in
Length
4,569mm180in
4,276mm168in
Width
1,769mm70in
1,785mm70in
Height
1,462mm58in
1,445mm57in
Wheelbase
2,578mm101in
2,635mm104in
Front track
1,541mm61in
1,505mm59in
Rear track
1,514mm60in
1,530mm60in
Trunk volume
585L
485L
Max trunk volume
1,455L
1,352L
Doors
5
3
Seats
5
4
Fuel tank
55L
50L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Skoda Octavia II Facelift 2009 RS 2.0 TSIHonda Civic Type R (FN2) 2.0PowerTorque
  • Skoda Octavia II Facelift 2009 RS 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
  • Honda Civic Type R (FN2) 2.0: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
SkodaOctavia IIFacelift 2009RS 2.0 TSI5,100 rpm1,800 rpm5,350 rpm
HondaCivic Type R (FN2)2.07,800 rpm5,600 rpm8,050 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricSkodaOctavia IIFacelift 2009RS 2.0 TSIHondaCivic Type R (FN2)2.0
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.1 s
6.3 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.5 s
6.6 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
30.4 s
26.5 s
Top speed
238 km/h
148 mph
235 km/h
146 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.6 s
2.5 s
330 ft
101 m
6.7 s
6.4 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.1 s
9.6 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.0 s
12.4 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.4 s
14.7 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
152 km/h
94 mph
159 km/h
99 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaOctavia IIFacelift 2009RS 2.0 TSI
200 hp
149 kW
HondaCivic Type R (FN2)2.0
201 hp
150 kW

Honda Civic Type R (FN2) 2.0 has 1 hp more than Skoda Octavia II Facelift 2009 RS 2.0 TSI.

The biggest power difference is between Skoda Octavia II Facelift 2009 RS 2.0 TSI and Honda Civic Type R (FN2) 2.0: 1 hp (1 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaOctavia IIFacelift 2009RS 2.0 TSI
280 Nm
207 lb-ft
HondaCivic Type R (FN2)2.0
193 Nm
142 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaOctavia IIFacelift 2009RS 2.0 TSI
1,470 kg
3,241 lb
HondaCivic Type R (FN2)2.0
1,267 kg
2,793 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaOctavia IIFacelift 2009RS 2.0 TSI
238 km/h
148 mph
HondaCivic Type R (FN2)2.0
235 km/h
146 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaOctavia IIFacelift 2009RS 2.0 TSI7.5 s
HondaCivic Type R (FN2)2.06.6 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Honda Civic Type R (FN2) 2.0 and Skoda Octavia II Facelift 2009 RS 2.0 TSI: 0.9 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaOctavia IIFacelift 2009RS 2.0 TSI
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK
HondaCivic Type R (FN2)2.0
9.1 L/100 km
25.8 mpg US
31.0 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Skoda Octavia II Facelift 2009 RS 2.0 TSI and Honda Civic Type R (FN2) 2.0: 1.4 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaOctavia IIFacelift 2009RS 2.0 TSI
136 hp/t
101 kW/t
7.3 kg/hp
HondaCivic Type R (FN2)2.0
159 hp/t
118 kW/t
6.3 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaOctavia IIFacelift 2009RS 2.0 TSI
714 km
444 mi
HondaCivic Type R (FN2)2.0
549 km
341 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
SkodaOctavia IIFacelift 2009RS 2.0 TSI
200 hp
149 kW
7.5 s
238 km/h
148 mph
HondaCivic Type R (FN2)2.0
201 hp
150 kW
6.6 s
235 km/h
146 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
SkodaOctavia IIFacelift 2009RS 2.0 TSI
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h7.5 s
Top speed
238 km/h
148 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
585 L
20.7 cu ft
Length
4,569 mm
179.9 in
Height
1,462 mm
57.6 in
HondaCivic Type R (FN2)2.0
Power
201 hp
150 kW
0-100 km/h6.6 s
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
Doors/seats
3 doors
4 seats
Trunk
485 L
17.1 cu ft
Length
4,276 mm
168.3 in
Height
1,445 mm
56.9 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
SkodaOctavia IIFacelift 2009RS 2.0 TSI
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h7.5 s
Top speed
238 km/h
148 mph
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK
HondaCivic Type R (FN2)2.0
Power
201 hp
150 kW
0-100 km/h6.6 s
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
9.1 L/100 km
25.8 mpg US
31.0 mpg UK

Honda Civic Type R (FN2) 2.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
SkodaOctavia IIFacelift 2009RS 2.0 TSI
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK
7.5 s
HondaCivic Type R (FN2)2.0
9.1 L/100 km
25.8 mpg US
31.0 mpg UK
6.6 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
SkodaOctavia IIFacelift 2009RS 2.0 TSI
136 hp/t
101 kW/t
7.4 kg/hp
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK
HondaCivic Type R (FN2)2.0
159 hp/t
118 kW/t
6.3 kg/hp
9.1 L/100 km
25.8 mpg US
31.0 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleSkodaOctavia IIFacelift 2009RS 2.0 TSIHondaCivic Type R (FN2)2.0
Power
200 hp
149 kW
201 hp
150 kW
Torque
280 Nm
207 lb-ft
193 Nm
142 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.5 s
6.6 s
Top speed
238 km/h
148 mph
235 km/h
146 mph
Lightness
1,470 kg
3,241 lb
1,267 kg
2,793 lb
Fuel consumption
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK
9.1 L/100 km
25.8 mpg US
31.0 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
585 L
20.7 cu ft
Length
4,569 mm
179.9 in
Height
1,462 mm
57.6 in
Doors/seats
3 doors
4 seats
Trunk
485 L
17.1 cu ft
Length
4,276 mm
168.3 in
Height
1,445 mm
56.9 in
Range score
714 km
444 mi
549 km
341 mi
Trunk score
585 L
20.7 cu ft
485 L
17.1 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
136 hp/t
101 kW/t
7.4 kg/hp
159 hp/t
118 kW/t
6.3 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleSkoda Octavia II Facelift 2009 RS 2.0 TSIHonda Civic Type R (FN2) 2.0
Consumption7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK9.1 L/100 km25.8 mpg US31 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km13.48 LC100 km15.92 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi21.69 LC100 mi25.63 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,155 L305 US gal254 UK gal1,365 L361 US gal300 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,021 LC/year2,389 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Skoda Octavia II Facelift 2009 RS 2.0 TSI

  • Has 87 Nm more
  • Has 3 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 1.4 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 165 km (102 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 100 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Heaviest

Honda Civic Type R (FN2) 2.0

  • Has 1 hp more
  • Is 203 kg lighter
  • Is 0.9 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 23 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Skoda Octavia II RS 2.0 TSI
Honda Civic Type R (FN2) 2.0
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

RS 2.0 TSI
2.0 TFSI
VS
SkodaOctavia IIFacelift 2009RS 2.0 TSIvsAUDIA3 Sportback (8PA)Facelift 20082.0 TFSI
2.0
2.0
VS
HondaCivic Type R (FN2)2.0vsHondaCivic Type R (EP3)Facelift 20032.0
RS 2.0 TSI
1.8 Di T-Jet 16V
VS
SkodaOctavia IIFacelift 2009RS 2.0 TSIvsLanciaDelta III (844)1.8 Di T-Jet 16V
2.0
2.0
VS
HondaCivic Type R (FN2)2.0vsHondaCivic Type R (EP3)2.0
RS 2.0 TSI
2.0 TFSI
VS
SkodaOctavia IIFacelift 2009RS 2.0 TSIvsAUDIA3 (8P)Facelift 20082.0 TFSI
2.0
2.0
VS
HondaCivic Type R (FN2)2.0vsHondaCivic Type R (FK2)2.0
RS 2.0 TSI
2.0 TFSI
VS
SkodaOctavia IIFacelift 2009RS 2.0 TSIvsVolkswagenBeetle (A5)2.0 TFSI
2.0
2.0
VS
HondaCivic Type R (FN2)2.0vsHondaCivic Type R (FK8)2.0
RS 2.0 TSI
RS 2.0 16V
VS
SkodaOctavia IIFacelift 2009RS 2.0 TSIvsRenaultClio III (PHASE II)RS 2.0 16V
2.0
2.0
VS
HondaCivic Type R (FN2)2.0vsHondaCivic Type R (FK8)Facelift 20202.0
RS 2.0 TSI
1.8 Di T-Jet 16V
VS
SkodaOctavia IIFacelift 2009RS 2.0 TSIvsLanciaDelta III (844)Facelift 20111.8 Di T-Jet 16V
RS 2.0 TSI
FR 2.0 TFSI
VS
SkodaOctavia IIFacelift 2009RS 2.0 TSIvsSeatLeon II (1P)Facelift 2009FR 2.0 TFSI
Skoda Octavia II · Facelift 2009 RS 2.0 TSI vs Honda Civic Type R (FN2) 2.0 - car comparison - FastVsFaster