Car comparison

Honda Civic Type R (FN2) 2.0vsLancia Delta III (844) 1.8 Di T-Jet 16V

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Honda Civic Type R (FN2)

2.0

201 hp1998 ccGasolineFWDManualNaturally aspiratedHatchback2007-2011
VS

Lancia Delta III (844)

1.8 Di T-Jet 16V

200 hp1742 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticTurbochargedHatchback2009-2011

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Lancia Delta III (844) 1.8 Di T-Jet 16V

  • Highest torque
    320 Nm
    236 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    7.8 L/100 km
    30.2 mpg US
    36.2 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    11.1 L/100 km
    21.2 mpg US
    25.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    5.9 L/100 km
    39.9 mpg US
    47.9 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    744 km
    462 mi
  • Best overall score
    59/100
  • Best economy score
    86/100
  • Best practicality score
    76/100

Honda Civic Type R (FN2) 2.0

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.6 s
  • Fastest top speed
    235 km/h
    146 mph
  • Most powerful
    201 hp
    150 kW
  • Lightest
    1,267 kg
    2,793 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    159 hp/t
    118 kW/t
    6.3 kg/hp
  • Largest trunk
    485 L
  • Best performance score
    53/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelHondaCivic Type R (FN2)2.0LanciaDelta III (844)1.8 Di T-Jet 16V
Power
201hp150kW
200hp149kW
Torque
193Nm142lb-ft
320Nm236lb-ft
Curb weight
1,267kg2,793lb
1,430kg3,153lb
Gross weight
1,700kg3,748lb
2,000kg4,409lb
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
230 km/h
143 mph
To 99% top speed
71.6s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph
Calculated
85.4s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
6.6s
7.4s
0-200 km/h
26.5s
Calculated
32.9s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.3s
Calculated
7.0s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
9.1L/100 km25.8mpg US31.0mpg UK
7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
12.7L/100 km18.5mpg US22.2mpg UK
11.1L/100 km21.2mpg US25.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK
5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK
Quarter mile
14.7s
Calculated
15.3s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
159hp/t118kW/t72hp/1000 lb
Calculated
140hp/t104kW/t63hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
152Nm/t102lb-ft/ton
Calculated
224Nm/t150lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
549km341mi
Calculated
744km462mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,998cc122cu in
1,742cc106cu in
Length
4,276mm168in
4,520mm178in
Width
1,785mm70in
1,797mm71in
Height
1,445mm57in
1,499mm59in
Wheelbase
2,635mm104in
2,700mm106in
Front track
1,505mm59in
1,538mm61in
Rear track
1,530mm60in
1,531mm60in
Trunk volume
485L
420L
Max trunk volume
1,352L
1,190L
Doors
3
5
Seats
4
5
Fuel tank
50L
58L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Honda Civic Type R (FN2) 2.0Lancia Delta III (844) 1.8 Di T-Jet 16VPowerTorque
  • Honda Civic Type R (FN2) 2.0: Power / Torque
  • Lancia Delta III (844) 1.8 Di T-Jet 16V: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
HondaCivic Type R (FN2)2.07,800 rpm5,600 rpm8,050 rpm
LanciaDelta III (844)1.8 Di T-Jet 16V5,000 rpm1,400 rpm5,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricHondaCivic Type R (FN2)2.0LanciaDelta III (844)1.8 Di T-Jet 16V
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.3 s
7.0 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
6.6 s
7.4 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
26.5 s
32.9 s
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
230 km/h
143 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.5 s
330 ft
101 m
6.4 s
6.7 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.6 s
10.0 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.4 s
12.9 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.7 s
15.3 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
159 km/h
99 mph
151 km/h
94 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
HondaCivic Type R (FN2)2.0
201 hp
150 kW
LanciaDelta III (844)1.8 Di T-Jet 16V
200 hp
149 kW

Honda Civic Type R (FN2) 2.0 has 1 hp more than Lancia Delta III (844) 1.8 Di T-Jet 16V.

The biggest power difference is between Lancia Delta III (844) 1.8 Di T-Jet 16V and Honda Civic Type R (FN2) 2.0: 1 hp (1 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
HondaCivic Type R (FN2)2.0
193 Nm
142 lb-ft
LanciaDelta III (844)1.8 Di T-Jet 16V
320 Nm
236 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
HondaCivic Type R (FN2)2.0
1,267 kg
2,793 lb
LanciaDelta III (844)1.8 Di T-Jet 16V
1,430 kg
3,153 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
HondaCivic Type R (FN2)2.0
235 km/h
146 mph
LanciaDelta III (844)1.8 Di T-Jet 16V
230 km/h
143 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
HondaCivic Type R (FN2)2.06.6 s
LanciaDelta III (844)1.8 Di T-Jet 16V7.4 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Honda Civic Type R (FN2) 2.0 and Lancia Delta III (844) 1.8 Di T-Jet 16V: 0.8 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
HondaCivic Type R (FN2)2.0
9.1 L/100 km
25.8 mpg US
31.0 mpg UK
LanciaDelta III (844)1.8 Di T-Jet 16V
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Lancia Delta III (844) 1.8 Di T-Jet 16V and Honda Civic Type R (FN2) 2.0: 1.3 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
HondaCivic Type R (FN2)2.0
159 hp/t
118 kW/t
6.3 kg/hp
LanciaDelta III (844)1.8 Di T-Jet 16V
140 hp/t
104 kW/t
7.1 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
HondaCivic Type R (FN2)2.0
549 km
341 mi
LanciaDelta III (844)1.8 Di T-Jet 16V
744 km
462 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
HondaCivic Type R (FN2)2.0
201 hp
150 kW
6.6 s
235 km/h
146 mph
LanciaDelta III (844)1.8 Di T-Jet 16V
200 hp
149 kW
7.4 s
230 km/h
143 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
HondaCivic Type R (FN2)2.0
Power
201 hp
150 kW
0-100 km/h6.6 s
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
Doors/seats
3 doors
4 seats
Trunk
485 L
17.1 cu ft
Length
4,276 mm
168.3 in
Height
1,445 mm
56.9 in
LanciaDelta III (844)1.8 Di T-Jet 16V
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h7.4 s
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
420 L
14.8 cu ft
Length
4,520 mm
178.0 in
Height
1,499 mm
59.0 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
HondaCivic Type R (FN2)2.0
Power
201 hp
150 kW
0-100 km/h6.6 s
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
9.1 L/100 km
25.8 mpg US
31.0 mpg UK
LanciaDelta III (844)1.8 Di T-Jet 16V
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h7.4 s
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK

Honda Civic Type R (FN2) 2.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
HondaCivic Type R (FN2)2.0
9.1 L/100 km
25.8 mpg US
31.0 mpg UK
6.6 s
LanciaDelta III (844)1.8 Di T-Jet 16V
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK
7.4 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
HondaCivic Type R (FN2)2.0
159 hp/t
118 kW/t
6.3 kg/hp
9.1 L/100 km
25.8 mpg US
31.0 mpg UK
LanciaDelta III (844)1.8 Di T-Jet 16V
140 hp/t
104 kW/t
7.2 kg/hp
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleHondaCivic Type R (FN2)2.0LanciaDelta III (844)1.8 Di T-Jet 16V
Power
201 hp
150 kW
200 hp
149 kW
Torque
193 Nm
142 lb-ft
320 Nm
236 lb-ft
Acceleration
6.6 s
7.4 s
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
230 km/h
143 mph
Lightness
1,267 kg
2,793 lb
1,430 kg
3,153 lb
Fuel consumption
9.1 L/100 km
25.8 mpg US
31.0 mpg UK
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
3 doors
4 seats
Trunk
485 L
17.1 cu ft
Length
4,276 mm
168.3 in
Height
1,445 mm
56.9 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
420 L
14.8 cu ft
Length
4,520 mm
178.0 in
Height
1,499 mm
59.0 in
Range score
549 km
341 mi
744 km
462 mi
Trunk score
485 L
17.1 cu ft
420 L
14.8 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
159 hp/t
118 kW/t
6.3 kg/hp
140 hp/t
104 kW/t
7.2 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleHonda Civic Type R (FN2) 2.0Lancia Delta III (844) 1.8 Di T-Jet 16V
Consumption9.1 L/100 km25.8 mpg US31 mpg UK7.8 L/100 km30.2 mpg US36.2 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km15.92 LC100 km13.65 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi25.63 LC100 mi21.97 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,365 L361 US gal300 UK gal1,170 L309 US gal257 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,389 LC/year2,048 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Honda Civic Type R (FN2) 2.0

  • Has 1 hp more
  • Is 163 kg lighter
  • Is 0.8 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 19 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 65 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption

Lancia Delta III (844) 1.8 Di T-Jet 16V

  • Has 127 Nm more
  • Uses 1.3 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 194 km (121 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Honda Civic Type R (FN2) 2.0
Lancia Delta III (844) 1.8 Di T-Jet 16V
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0
2.0
VS
HondaCivic Type R (FN2)2.0vsHondaCivic Type R (EP3)Facelift 20032.0
1.8 Di T-Jet 16V
1.8 Di T-Jet 16V
VS
LanciaDelta III (844)1.8 Di T-Jet 16VvsLanciaDelta III (844)Facelift 20111.8 Di T-Jet 16V
2.0
2.0
VS
HondaCivic Type R (FN2)2.0vsHondaCivic Type R (EP3)2.0
1.8 Di T-Jet 16V
A 200 Turbo
VS
LanciaDelta III (844)1.8 Di T-Jet 16VvsMercedes-BenzA-class (W169)Facelift 2008A 200 Turbo
2.0
2.0
VS
HondaCivic Type R (FN2)2.0vsHondaCivic Type R (FK2)2.0
1.8 Di T-Jet 16V
2.0 TFSI
VS
LanciaDelta III (844)1.8 Di T-Jet 16VvsAUDIA3 Sportback (8PA)Facelift 20082.0 TFSI
2.0
2.0
VS
HondaCivic Type R (FN2)2.0vsHondaCivic Type R (FK8)2.0
1.8 Di T-Jet 16V
2.0 TFSI
VS
LanciaDelta III (844)1.8 Di T-Jet 16VvsAUDIA3 (8P)Facelift 20082.0 TFSI
2.0
2.0
VS
HondaCivic Type R (FN2)2.0vsHondaCivic Type R (FK8)Facelift 20202.0
1.8 Di T-Jet 16V
FR 2.0 TFSI
VS
LanciaDelta III (844)1.8 Di T-Jet 16VvsSeatLeon II (1P)Facelift 2009FR 2.0 TFSI
1.8 Di T-Jet 16V
2.0 TFSI
VS
LanciaDelta III (844)1.8 Di T-Jet 16VvsVolkswagenBeetle (A5)2.0 TFSI
2.0
2.0
VS
HondaCivic Type R (FN2)2.0vsHondaCivic Type R (FL5)2.0
Honda Civic Type R (FN2) 2.0 vs Lancia Delta III (844) 1.8 Di T-Jet 16V - car comparison - FastVsFaster