Honda Accord VIII · Facelift 2011
Car comparison
Honda Accord VIII · Facelift 2011 2.4 i-VTECvsSuzuki Kizashi 2.4
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonSuzuki Kizashi
2.4
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Suzuki Kizashi 2.4
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.8 s
- Lightest1,494 kg3,294 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.9 L/100 km29.8 mpg US35.8 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption10.6 L/100 km22.2 mpg US26.6 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.3 L/100 km37.3 mpg US44.8 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions183 g/km
- Best estimated range797 km496 mi
- Best economy score86/100
- Best practicality score78/100
Honda Accord VIII Facelift 2011 2.4 i-VTEC
- Fastest top speed227 km/h141 mph
- Most powerful201 hp150 kW
- Highest torque234 Nm173 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight128 hp/t95 kW/t7.8 kg/hp
- Largest trunk464 L
- Best overall score56/100
- Best performance score48/100
Specification comparison
| Model | HondaAccord VIIIFacelift 20112.4 i-VTEC | SuzukiKizashi2.4 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 201hp150kW | 178hp133kW |
| Torque | 234Nm173lb-ft | 230Nm170lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,570kg3,461lb | 1,494kg3,294lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,000kg4,409lb |
| Top speed | 227 km/h 141 mph | 215 km/h 134 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 70.2s99% target: 225 km/h / 140 mph Calculated | 63.9s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.0s | 7.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 31.3s Calculated | 35.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.6s Calculated | 7.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.6L/100 km27.4mpg US32.8mpg UK | 7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 11L/100 km21.4mpg US25.7mpg UK | 10.6L/100 km22.2mpg US26.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK | 6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.8s Calculated | 15.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 128hp/t95kW/t58hp/1000 lb Calculated | 119hp/t89kW/t54hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 149Nm/t100lb-ft/ton Calculated | 154Nm/t103lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 756km470mi Calculated | 797km496mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,354cc144cu in | 2,393cc146cu in |
| Length | 4,725mm186in | 4,650mm183in |
| Width | 1,840mm72in | 1,820mm72in |
| Height | 1,440mm57in | 1,470mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,705mm106in | 2,700mm106in |
| Front track | - | 1,565mm62in |
| Rear track | - | 1,575mm62in |
| Ground clearance | - | 135mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 464L | - |
| Max trunk volume | - | 461L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 65L | 63L |
| CO2 emissions | 199g/km | 183g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Honda Accord VIII Facelift 2011 2.4 i-VTEC: Power / Torque
- Suzuki Kizashi 2.4: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| HondaAccord VIIIFacelift 20112.4 i-VTEC | 7,000 rpm | 4,300-4,400 rpm | 7,250 rpm |
| SuzukiKizashi2.4 | 6,500 rpm | 4,000 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | HondaAccord VIIIFacelift 20112.4 i-VTEC | SuzukiKizashi2.4 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.6 s | 7.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.0 s | 7.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 31.3 s | 35.9 s |
| Top speed | 227 km/h 141 mph | 215 km/h 134 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.8 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.1 s | 7.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.5 s | 10.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.4 s | 13.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.8 s | 15.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 152 km/h 95 mph | 151 km/h 94 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HondaAccord VIIIFacelift 20112.4 i-VTEC | 201 hp 150 kW |
| SuzukiKizashi2.4 | 178 hp 133 kW |
Honda Accord VIII Facelift 2011 2.4 i-VTEC has 23 hp more than Suzuki Kizashi 2.4.
The biggest power difference is between Suzuki Kizashi 2.4 and Honda Accord VIII Facelift 2011 2.4 i-VTEC: 23 hp (17 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HondaAccord VIIIFacelift 20112.4 i-VTEC | 234 Nm 173 lb-ft |
| SuzukiKizashi2.4 | 230 Nm 170 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HondaAccord VIIIFacelift 20112.4 i-VTEC | 1,570 kg 3,461 lb |
| SuzukiKizashi2.4 | 1,494 kg 3,294 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HondaAccord VIIIFacelift 20112.4 i-VTEC | 227 km/h 141 mph |
| SuzukiKizashi2.4 | 215 km/h 134 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HondaAccord VIIIFacelift 20112.4 i-VTEC | 8.0 s |
| SuzukiKizashi2.4 | 7.8 s |
Although Honda Accord VIII Facelift 2011 2.4 i-VTEC has more power, Suzuki Kizashi 2.4 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Suzuki Kizashi 2.4 and Honda Accord VIII Facelift 2011 2.4 i-VTEC: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HondaAccord VIIIFacelift 20112.4 i-VTEC | 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK |
| SuzukiKizashi2.4 | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Suzuki Kizashi 2.4 and Honda Accord VIII Facelift 2011 2.4 i-VTEC: 0.7 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HondaAccord VIIIFacelift 20112.4 i-VTEC | 128 hp/t 95 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp |
| SuzukiKizashi2.4 | 119 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HondaAccord VIIIFacelift 20112.4 i-VTEC | 756 km 470 mi |
| SuzukiKizashi2.4 | 797 km 496 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| HondaAccord VIIIFacelift 20112.4 i-VTEC | 201 hp 150 kW | 8.0 s | 227 km/h 141 mph |
| SuzukiKizashi2.4 | 178 hp 133 kW | 7.8 s | 215 km/h 134 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HondaAccord VIIIFacelift 20112.4 i-VTEC |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| SuzukiKizashi2.4 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HondaAccord VIIIFacelift 20112.4 i-VTEC |
| 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| SuzukiKizashi2.4 |
| 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | ||||||
Honda Accord VIII Facelift 2011 2.4 i-VTEC is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| HondaAccord VIIIFacelift 20112.4 i-VTEC | 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK | 8.0 s |
| SuzukiKizashi2.4 | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | 7.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| HondaAccord VIIIFacelift 20112.4 i-VTEC | 128 hp/t 95 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp | 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK |
| SuzukiKizashi2.4 | 119 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | HondaAccord VIIIFacelift 20112.4 i-VTEC | SuzukiKizashi2.4 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 201 hp 150 kW | 178 hp 133 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 234 Nm 173 lb-ft | 230 Nm 170 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.0 s | 7.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 227 km/h 141 mph | 215 km/h 134 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,570 kg 3,461 lb | 1,494 kg 3,294 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 756 km 470 mi | 797 km 496 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 199 g/km | 183 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 464 L 16.4 cu ft | 461 L 16.3 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 128 hp/t 95 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp | 119 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Honda Accord VIII Facelift 2011 2.4 i-VTEC | Suzuki Kizashi 2.4 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.6 L/100 km27.4 mpg US32.8 mpg UK | 7.9 L/100 km29.8 mpg US35.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 15.05 LC100 km | 13.83 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 24.22 LC100 mi | 22.25 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,290 L341 US gal284 UK gal | 1,185 L313 US gal261 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,258 LC/year | 2,074 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Honda Accord VIII Facelift 2011 2.4 i-VTEC
- Has 23 hp more
- Has 4 Nm more
- Has 12 km/h (7 mph) higher top speed
- Has 9 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 3 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Highest CO2 emissions
Suzuki Kizashi 2.4
- Is 76 kg lighter
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 0.7 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 42 km (26 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 16 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























