Mercedes-Benz C-class (W202) · Facelift 1997
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W202) · Facelift 1997 AMG C 43 V8vsHolden Commodore (VT) 5.7 i V8 SS
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonHolden Commodore (VT)
5.7 i V8 SS
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W202) Facelift 1997 AMG C 43 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.5 s
- Fastest top speed265 km/h165 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful306 hp228 kW
- Lightest1,570 kg3,461 lb
- Best power-to-weight195 hp/t145 kW/t5.1 kg/hp
- Best overall score66/100
- Best performance score63/100
- Best economy score75/100
Holden Commodore (VT) 5.7 i V8 SS
- Highest torque460 Nm339 lb-ft
- Lowest city consumption13.0 L/100 km18.1 mpg US21.7 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.4 L/100 km31.8 mpg US38.2 mpg UK
- Largest trunk475 L
- Best practicality score75/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)Facelift 1997AMG C 43 V8 | HoldenCommodore (VT)5.7 i V8 SS |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 306hp228kW | 306hp228kW |
| Torque | 410Nm302lb-ft | 460Nm339lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,570kg3,461lb | 1,640kg3,616lb |
| Gross weight | 1,970kg4,343lb | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | 234 km/h 145 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 65.2s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated | 60.0s99% target: 232 km/h / 144 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.5s | 6.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 19.6s Calculated | 24.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.2s Calculated | 6.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 11.7L/100 km20.1mpg US24.1mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 16.5L/100 km14.3mpg US17.1mpg UK | 13L/100 km18.1mpg US21.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.9L/100 km26.4mpg US31.7mpg UK | 7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.4s Calculated | 14.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 195hp/t145kW/t88hp/1000 lb Calculated | 187hp/t139kW/t85hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 261Nm/t175lb-ft/ton Calculated | 280Nm/t188lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 530km329mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 4,266cc260cu in | 5,665cc346cu in |
| Length | 4,516mm178in | 4,964mm195in |
| Width | 1,723mm68in | 1,842mm73in |
| Height | 1,387mm55in | 1,450mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,690mm106in | 2,788mm110in |
| Front track | 1,509mm59in | 1,569mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,483mm58in | 1,587mm62in |
| Trunk volume | 430L | 475L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 62L | 75L |
| CO2 emissions | 280g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz C-class (W202) Facelift 1997 AMG C 43 V8: Power / Torque
- Holden Commodore (VT) 5.7 i V8 SS: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)Facelift 1997AMG C 43 V8 | 5,850 rpm | 3,250-5,000 rpm | 6,100 rpm |
| HoldenCommodore (VT)5.7 i V8 SS | 5,200 rpm | 4,400 rpm | 5,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)Facelift 1997AMG C 43 V8 | HoldenCommodore (VT)5.7 i V8 SS |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.2 s | 6.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.5 s | 6.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 19.6 s | 24.6 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited | 234 km/h 145 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.6 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.7 s | 9.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.2 s | 12.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.4 s | 14.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 171 km/h 106 mph | 162 km/h 101 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)Facelift 1997AMG C 43 V8 | 306 hp 228 kW |
| HoldenCommodore (VT)5.7 i V8 SS | 306 hp 228 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)Facelift 1997AMG C 43 V8 | 410 Nm 302 lb-ft |
| HoldenCommodore (VT)5.7 i V8 SS | 460 Nm 339 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)Facelift 1997AMG C 43 V8 | 1,570 kg 3,461 lb |
| HoldenCommodore (VT)5.7 i V8 SS | 1,640 kg 3,616 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)Facelift 1997AMG C 43 V8 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| HoldenCommodore (VT)5.7 i V8 SS | 234 km/h 145 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)Facelift 1997AMG C 43 V8 | 6.5 s |
| HoldenCommodore (VT)5.7 i V8 SS | 6.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W202) Facelift 1997 AMG C 43 V8 and Holden Commodore (VT) 5.7 i V8 SS: 0.4 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)Facelift 1997AMG C 43 V8 | 195 hp/t 145 kW/t 5.1 kg/hp |
| HoldenCommodore (VT)5.7 i V8 SS | 187 hp/t 139 kW/t 5.4 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)Facelift 1997AMG C 43 V8 | 306 hp 228 kW | 6.5 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| HoldenCommodore (VT)5.7 i V8 SS | 306 hp 228 kW | 6.9 s | 234 km/h 145 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)Facelift 1997AMG C 43 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| HoldenCommodore (VT)5.7 i V8 SS |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)Facelift 1997AMG C 43 V8 | HoldenCommodore (VT)5.7 i V8 SS | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 306 hp 228 kW | 306 hp 228 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 410 Nm 302 lb-ft | 460 Nm 339 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.5 s | 6.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | 234 km/h 145 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,570 kg 3,461 lb | 1,640 kg 3,616 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 11.7 L/100 km 20.1 mpg US 24.1 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 530 km 329 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 280 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 430 L 15.2 cu ft | 475 L 16.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 195 hp/t 145 kW/t 5.1 kg/hp | 187 hp/t 139 kW/t 5.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz C-class (W202) Facelift 1997 AMG C 43 V8 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 11.7 L/100 km20.1 mpg US24.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 20.47 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 32.95 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,755 L464 US gal386 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,071 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W202) Facelift 1997 AMG C 43 V8
- Is 70 kg lighter
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 31 km/h (19 mph) higher top speed
- Has 8 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Smallest trunk
Holden Commodore (VT) 5.7 i V8 SS
- Has 50 Nm more
- Has 45 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























