Jaguar XJ (X350)
Car comparison
Jaguar XJ (X350) 4.2 V8 32V LvsHolden Commodore (VT) 5.7 i V8 SS
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonHolden Commodore (VT)
5.7 i V8 SS
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Holden Commodore (VT) 5.7 i V8 SS
- Most powerful340 hp254 kW
- Highest torque470 Nm347 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight207 hp/t155 kW/t4.8 kg/hp
- Lowest city consumption13.0 L/100 km18.1 mpg US21.7 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.4 L/100 km31.8 mpg US38.2 mpg UK
- Largest trunk475 L
- Best overall score67/100
- Best performance score63/100
Jaguar XJ (X350) 4.2 V8 32V L
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.6 s
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Lightest1,640 kg3,616 lb
- Best economy score78/100
- Best practicality score75/100
Specification comparison
| Model | JaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32V L | HoldenCommodore (VT)5.7 i V8 SS |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 298hp222kW | 340hp254kW |
| Torque | 411Nm303lb-ft | 470Nm347lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,640kg3,616lb | 1,640kg3,616lb |
| Gross weight | 2,225kg4,905lb | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | 234 km/h 145 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 68.3s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 57.9s99% target: 232 km/h / 144 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.6s | 6.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 20.8s Calculated | 24.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.3s Calculated | 6.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 10.9L/100 km21.6mpg US25.9mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 16L/100 km14.7mpg US17.7mpg UK | 13L/100 km18.1mpg US21.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK | 7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.5s Calculated | 14.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 182hp/t135kW/t82hp/1000 lb Calculated | 207hp/t155kW/t94hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 251Nm/t168lb-ft/ton Calculated | 287Nm/t192lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 780km485mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 4,196cc256cu in | 5,665cc346cu in |
| Length | 5,215mm205in | 4,884mm192in |
| Width | 1,860mm73in | 1,842mm73in |
| Height | 1,448mm57in | 1,450mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 3,159mm124in | 2,788mm110in |
| Front track | 1,556mm61in | 1,569mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,546mm61in | 1,587mm62in |
| Trunk volume | 470L | 475L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 85L | 75L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Jaguar XJ (X350) 4.2 V8 32V L: Power / Torque
- Holden Commodore (VT) 5.7 i V8 SS: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32V L | 6,000 rpm | 4,100 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| HoldenCommodore (VT)5.7 i V8 SS | 5,600 rpm | 4,800 rpm | 5,850 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | JaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32V L | HoldenCommodore (VT)5.7 i V8 SS |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.3 s | 6.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.6 s | 6.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 20.8 s | 24.1 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | 234 km/h 145 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.6 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.7 s | 9.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.3 s | 12.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.5 s | 14.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 168 km/h 104 mph | 163 km/h 101 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32V L | 298 hp 222 kW |
| HoldenCommodore (VT)5.7 i V8 SS | 340 hp 254 kW |
Holden Commodore (VT) 5.7 i V8 SS has 42 hp more than Jaguar XJ (X350) 4.2 V8 32V L.
The biggest power difference is between Jaguar XJ (X350) 4.2 V8 32V L and Holden Commodore (VT) 5.7 i V8 SS: 42 hp (31 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32V L | 411 Nm 303 lb-ft |
| HoldenCommodore (VT)5.7 i V8 SS | 470 Nm 347 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32V L | 1,640 kg 3,616 lb |
| HoldenCommodore (VT)5.7 i V8 SS | 1,640 kg 3,616 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32V L | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| HoldenCommodore (VT)5.7 i V8 SS | 234 km/h 145 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32V L | 6.6 s |
| HoldenCommodore (VT)5.7 i V8 SS | 6.9 s |
Although Holden Commodore (VT) 5.7 i V8 SS has more power, Jaguar XJ (X350) 4.2 V8 32V L is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Jaguar XJ (X350) 4.2 V8 32V L and Holden Commodore (VT) 5.7 i V8 SS: 0.3 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32V L | 182 hp/t 135 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp |
| HoldenCommodore (VT)5.7 i V8 SS | 207 hp/t 155 kW/t 4.8 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32V L | 298 hp 222 kW | 6.6 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| HoldenCommodore (VT)5.7 i V8 SS | 340 hp 254 kW | 6.9 s | 234 km/h 145 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32V L |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| HoldenCommodore (VT)5.7 i V8 SS |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | JaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32V L | HoldenCommodore (VT)5.7 i V8 SS | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 298 hp 222 kW | 340 hp 254 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 411 Nm 303 lb-ft | 470 Nm 347 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.6 s | 6.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | 234 km/h 145 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,640 kg 3,616 lb | 1,640 kg 3,616 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 10.9 L/100 km 21.6 mpg US 25.9 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 780 km 485 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 470 L 16.6 cu ft | 475 L 16.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 182 hp/t 135 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp | 207 hp/t 155 kW/t 4.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Jaguar XJ (X350) 4.2 V8 32V L |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 10.9 L/100 km21.6 mpg US25.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 19.08 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 30.70 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,635 L432 US gal360 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,861 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Jaguar XJ (X350) 4.2 V8 32V L
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 26 km/h (16 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
Cons
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Holden Commodore (VT) 5.7 i V8 SS
- Has 42 hp more
- Has 59 Nm more
- Has 26 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 5 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























