Car comparison

Jaguar XJ (X350) 4.2 V8 32V LvsHolden Commodore (VT) 5.7 i V8 SS

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Jaguar XJ (X350)

4.2 V8 32V L

298 hp4196 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticNaturally aspiratedSedan2004-2006
VS

Holden Commodore (VT)

5.7 i V8 SS

340 hp5665 ccGasolineRWDManualNaturally aspiratedSedan2004-2006

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Holden Commodore (VT) 5.7 i V8 SS

  • Most powerful
    340 hp
    254 kW
  • Highest torque
    470 Nm
    347 lb-ft
  • Best power-to-weight
    207 hp/t
    155 kW/t
    4.8 kg/hp
  • Lowest city consumption
    13.0 L/100 km
    18.1 mpg US
    21.7 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    7.4 L/100 km
    31.8 mpg US
    38.2 mpg UK
  • Largest trunk
    475 L
  • Best overall score
    67/100
  • Best performance score
    63/100

Jaguar XJ (X350) 4.2 V8 32V L

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.6 s
  • Fastest top speed
    260 km/h
    162 mph Unrestricted
    250 km/h
    155 mph Restricted
  • Lightest
    1,640 kg
    3,616 lb
  • Best economy score
    78/100
  • Best practicality score
    75/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelJaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32V LHoldenCommodore (VT)5.7 i V8 SS
Power
298hp222kW
340hp254kW
Torque
411Nm303lb-ft
470Nm347lb-ft
Curb weight
1,640kg3,616lb
1,640kg3,616lb
Gross weight
2,225kg4,905lb
-
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
234 km/h
145 mph
To 99% top speed
68.3s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph
Calculated
57.9s99% target: 232 km/h / 144 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
6.6s
6.9s
0-200 km/h
20.8s
Calculated
24.1s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.3s
Calculated
6.6s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
10.9L/100 km21.6mpg US25.9mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption city
16L/100 km14.7mpg US17.7mpg UK
13L/100 km18.1mpg US21.7mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK
7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK
Quarter mile
14.5s
Calculated
14.8s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
182hp/t135kW/t82hp/1000 lb
Calculated
207hp/t155kW/t94hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
251Nm/t168lb-ft/ton
Calculated
287Nm/t192lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
780km485mi
Calculated
-
Displacement
4,196cc256cu in
5,665cc346cu in
Length
5,215mm205in
4,884mm192in
Width
1,860mm73in
1,842mm73in
Height
1,448mm57in
1,450mm57in
Wheelbase
3,159mm124in
2,788mm110in
Front track
1,556mm61in
1,569mm62in
Rear track
1,546mm61in
1,587mm62in
Trunk volume
470L
475L
Doors
4
4
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
85L
75L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Jaguar XJ (X350) 4.2 V8 32V LHolden Commodore (VT) 5.7 i V8 SSPowerTorque
  • Jaguar XJ (X350) 4.2 V8 32V L: Power / Torque
  • Holden Commodore (VT) 5.7 i V8 SS: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
JaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32V L6,000 rpm4,100 rpm6,250 rpm
HoldenCommodore (VT)5.7 i V8 SS5,600 rpm4,800 rpm5,850 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricJaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32V LHoldenCommodore (VT)5.7 i V8 SS
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.3 s
6.6 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
6.6 s
6.9 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
20.8 s
24.1 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Likely limited
234 km/h
145 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.6 s
2.7 s
330 ft
101 m
6.6 s
6.7 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.7 s
9.9 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.3 s
12.6 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.5 s
14.8 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
168 km/h
104 mph
163 km/h
101 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32V L
298 hp
222 kW
HoldenCommodore (VT)5.7 i V8 SS
340 hp
254 kW

Holden Commodore (VT) 5.7 i V8 SS has 42 hp more than Jaguar XJ (X350) 4.2 V8 32V L.

The biggest power difference is between Jaguar XJ (X350) 4.2 V8 32V L and Holden Commodore (VT) 5.7 i V8 SS: 42 hp (31 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32V L
411 Nm
303 lb-ft
HoldenCommodore (VT)5.7 i V8 SS
470 Nm
347 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32V L
1,640 kg
3,616 lb
HoldenCommodore (VT)5.7 i V8 SS
1,640 kg
3,616 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32V L
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
HoldenCommodore (VT)5.7 i V8 SS
234 km/h
145 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Although Holden Commodore (VT) 5.7 i V8 SS has more power, Jaguar XJ (X350) 4.2 V8 32V L is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Jaguar XJ (X350) 4.2 V8 32V L and Holden Commodore (VT) 5.7 i V8 SS: 0.3 s.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32V L
182 hp/t
135 kW/t
5.5 kg/hp
HoldenCommodore (VT)5.7 i V8 SS
207 hp/t
155 kW/t
4.8 kg/hp

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
JaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32V L
298 hp
222 kW
6.6 s
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
HoldenCommodore (VT)5.7 i V8 SS
340 hp
254 kW
6.9 s
234 km/h
145 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
JaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32V L
Power
298 hp
222 kW
0-100 km/h6.6 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
470 L
16.6 cu ft
Length
5,215 mm
205.3 in
Height
1,448 mm
57.0 in
HoldenCommodore (VT)5.7 i V8 SS
Power
340 hp
254 kW
0-100 km/h6.9 s
Top speed
234 km/h
145 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
475 L
16.8 cu ft
Length
4,884 mm
192.3 in
Height
1,450 mm
57.1 in

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleJaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32V LHoldenCommodore (VT)5.7 i V8 SS
Power
298 hp
222 kW
340 hp
254 kW
Torque
411 Nm
303 lb-ft
470 Nm
347 lb-ft
Acceleration
6.6 s
6.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
234 km/h
145 mph
Lightness
1,640 kg
3,616 lb
1,640 kg
3,616 lb
Fuel consumption
10.9 L/100 km
21.6 mpg US
25.9 mpg UK
-
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
470 L
16.6 cu ft
Length
5,215 mm
205.3 in
Height
1,448 mm
57.0 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
475 L
16.8 cu ft
Length
4,884 mm
192.3 in
Height
1,450 mm
57.1 in
Range score
780 km
485 mi
-
Trunk score
470 L
16.6 cu ft
475 L
16.8 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
182 hp/t
135 kW/t
5.5 kg/hp
207 hp/t
155 kW/t
4.8 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleJaguar XJ (X350) 4.2 V8 32V L
Consumption10.9 L/100 km21.6 mpg US25.9 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km19.08 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi30.70 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,635 L432 US gal360 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,861 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Jaguar XJ (X350) 4.2 V8 32V L

  • Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 26 km/h (16 mph) higher top speed

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Lightest

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Smallest trunk

Holden Commodore (VT) 5.7 i V8 SS

  • Has 42 hp more
  • Has 59 Nm more
  • Has 26 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 5 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Jaguar XJ (X350) 4.2 V8 32V L
Holden Commodore (VT) 5.7 i V8 SS
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Jaguar XJ (X350) 4.2 V8 32V L vs Holden Commodore (VT) 5.7 i V8 SS - car comparison - FastVsFaster