AUDI A6 (4F/C6)
Car comparison
AUDI A6 (4F/C6) 4.2 V8 40VvsHolden Commodore (VT) 5.7 i V8 SS
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonHolden Commodore (VT)
5.7 i V8 SS
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI A6 (4F/C6) 4.2 V8 40V
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.1 s
- Fastest top speed265 km/h165 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Largest trunk546 L
- Best overall score70/100
- Best performance score66/100
- Best economy score76/100
- Best practicality score78/100
Holden Commodore (VT) 5.7 i V8 SS
- Most powerful340 hp254 kW
- Highest torque470 Nm347 lb-ft
- Lightest1,640 kg3,616 lb
- Best power-to-weight207 hp/t155 kW/t4.8 kg/hp
- Lowest city consumption13.0 L/100 km18.1 mpg US21.7 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.4 L/100 km31.8 mpg US38.2 mpg UK
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDIA6 (4F/C6)4.2 V8 40V | HoldenCommodore (VT)5.7 i V8 SS |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 335hp250kW | 340hp254kW |
| Torque | 420Nm310lb-ft | 470Nm347lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,745kg3,847lb | 1,640kg3,616lb |
| Gross weight | 2,325kg5,126lb | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | 234 km/h 145 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 62.1s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated | 57.9s99% target: 232 km/h / 144 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.1s | 6.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 18.5s Calculated | 24.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.8s Calculated | 6.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 11.6L/100 km20.3mpg US24.4mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 16.5L/100 km14.3mpg US17.1mpg UK | 13L/100 km18.1mpg US21.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK | 7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.0s Calculated | 14.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 192hp/t143kW/t87hp/1000 lb Calculated | 207hp/t155kW/t94hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 241Nm/t161lb-ft/ton Calculated | 287Nm/t192lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 690km429mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 4,163cc254cu in | 5,665cc346cu in |
| Length | 4,916mm194in | 4,884mm192in |
| Width | 1,855mm73in | 1,842mm73in |
| Height | 1,459mm57in | 1,450mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,843mm112in | 2,788mm110in |
| Front track | 1,612mm63in | 1,569mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,618mm64in | 1,587mm62in |
| Trunk volume | - | 475L |
| Max trunk volume | 546L | - |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 80L | 75L |
| CO2 emissions | 278g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI A6 (4F/C6) 4.2 V8 40V: Power / Torque
- Holden Commodore (VT) 5.7 i V8 SS: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA6 (4F/C6)4.2 V8 40V | 6,600 rpm | 3,500 rpm | 6,850 rpm |
| HoldenCommodore (VT)5.7 i V8 SS | 5,600 rpm | 4,800 rpm | 5,850 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDIA6 (4F/C6)4.2 V8 40V | HoldenCommodore (VT)5.7 i V8 SS |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.8 s | 6.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.1 s | 6.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 18.5 s | 24.1 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | 234 km/h 145 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.4 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.4 s | 9.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.9 s | 12.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.0 s | 14.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 174 km/h 108 mph | 163 km/h 101 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA6 (4F/C6)4.2 V8 40V | 335 hp 250 kW |
| HoldenCommodore (VT)5.7 i V8 SS | 340 hp 254 kW |
Holden Commodore (VT) 5.7 i V8 SS has 5 hp more than AUDI A6 (4F/C6) 4.2 V8 40V.
The biggest power difference is between AUDI A6 (4F/C6) 4.2 V8 40V and Holden Commodore (VT) 5.7 i V8 SS: 5 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA6 (4F/C6)4.2 V8 40V | 420 Nm 310 lb-ft |
| HoldenCommodore (VT)5.7 i V8 SS | 470 Nm 347 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA6 (4F/C6)4.2 V8 40V | 1,745 kg 3,847 lb |
| HoldenCommodore (VT)5.7 i V8 SS | 1,640 kg 3,616 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA6 (4F/C6)4.2 V8 40V | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| HoldenCommodore (VT)5.7 i V8 SS | 234 km/h 145 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA6 (4F/C6)4.2 V8 40V | 6.1 s |
| HoldenCommodore (VT)5.7 i V8 SS | 6.9 s |
Although Holden Commodore (VT) 5.7 i V8 SS has more power, AUDI A6 (4F/C6) 4.2 V8 40V is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI A6 (4F/C6) 4.2 V8 40V and Holden Commodore (VT) 5.7 i V8 SS: 0.8 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA6 (4F/C6)4.2 V8 40V | 192 hp/t 143 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp |
| HoldenCommodore (VT)5.7 i V8 SS | 207 hp/t 155 kW/t 4.8 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA6 (4F/C6)4.2 V8 40V | 335 hp 250 kW | 6.1 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| HoldenCommodore (VT)5.7 i V8 SS | 340 hp 254 kW | 6.9 s | 234 km/h 145 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA6 (4F/C6)4.2 V8 40V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| HoldenCommodore (VT)5.7 i V8 SS |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDIA6 (4F/C6)4.2 V8 40V | HoldenCommodore (VT)5.7 i V8 SS | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 335 hp 250 kW | 340 hp 254 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 420 Nm 310 lb-ft | 470 Nm 347 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.1 s | 6.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | 234 km/h 145 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,745 kg 3,847 lb | 1,640 kg 3,616 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 11.6 L/100 km 20.3 mpg US 24.4 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 690 km 429 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 278 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 546 L 19.3 cu ft | 475 L 16.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 192 hp/t 143 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp | 207 hp/t 155 kW/t 4.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI A6 (4F/C6) 4.2 V8 40V |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 11.6 L/100 km20.3 mpg US24.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 20.30 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 32.67 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,740 L460 US gal383 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,045 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI A6 (4F/C6) 4.2 V8 40V
- Is 0.8 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 31 km/h (19 mph) higher top speed
- Has 71 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
Holden Commodore (VT) 5.7 i V8 SS
- Has 5 hp more
- Has 50 Nm more
- Is 105 kg lighter
- Has 15 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























