AUDI A8L (D3/4E) · Facelift 2005
Car comparison
AUDI A8L (D3/4E) · Facelift 2005 4.2 FSI V8vsHolden Commodore (VT) 5.7 i V8 SS
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonHolden Commodore (VT)
5.7 i V8 SS
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI A8L (D3/4E) Facelift 2005 4.2 FSI V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.3 s
- Fastest top speed265 km/h165 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful350 hp261 kW
- Largest trunk500 L
- Best overall score70/100
- Best performance score67/100
- Best economy score78/100
- Best practicality score76/100
Holden Commodore (VT) 5.7 i V8 SS
- Highest torque470 Nm347 lb-ft
- Lightest1,640 kg3,616 lb
- Best power-to-weight207 hp/t155 kW/t4.8 kg/hp
- Lowest city consumption13.0 L/100 km18.1 mpg US21.7 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.4 L/100 km31.8 mpg US38.2 mpg UK
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDIA8L (D3/4E)Facelift 20054.2 FSI V8 | HoldenCommodore (VT)5.7 i V8 SS |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 350hp261kW | 340hp254kW |
| Torque | 440Nm325lb-ft | 470Nm347lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,850kg4,079lb | 1,640kg3,616lb |
| Gross weight | 2,450kg5,401lb | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | 234 km/h 145 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 63.7s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated | 57.9s99% target: 232 km/h / 144 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.3s | 6.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 19.1s Calculated | 24.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.0s Calculated | 6.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 10.9L/100 km21.6mpg US25.9mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 15.7L/100 km15mpg US18.0mpg UK | 13L/100 km18.1mpg US21.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.2L/100 km28.7mpg US34.4mpg UK | 7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.2s Calculated | 14.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 189hp/t141kW/t86hp/1000 lb Calculated | 207hp/t155kW/t94hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 238Nm/t159lb-ft/ton Calculated | 287Nm/t192lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 826km513mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 4,163cc254cu in | 5,665cc346cu in |
| Length | 5,192mm204in | 4,884mm192in |
| Width | 1,894mm75in | 1,842mm73in |
| Height | 1,455mm57in | 1,450mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 3,074mm121in | 2,788mm110in |
| Front track | 1,629mm64in | 1,569mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,615mm64in | 1,587mm62in |
| Trunk volume | 500L | 475L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 90L | 75L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI A8L (D3/4E) Facelift 2005 4.2 FSI V8: Power / Torque
- Holden Commodore (VT) 5.7 i V8 SS: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA8L (D3/4E)Facelift 20054.2 FSI V8 | 6,800 rpm | 3,500 rpm | 7,050 rpm |
| HoldenCommodore (VT)5.7 i V8 SS | 5,600 rpm | 4,800 rpm | 5,850 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDIA8L (D3/4E)Facelift 20054.2 FSI V8 | HoldenCommodore (VT)5.7 i V8 SS |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.0 s | 6.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.3 s | 6.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 19.1 s | 24.1 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | 234 km/h 145 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.5 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.5 s | 9.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.1 s | 12.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.2 s | 14.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 173 km/h 107 mph | 163 km/h 101 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA8L (D3/4E)Facelift 20054.2 FSI V8 | 350 hp 261 kW |
| HoldenCommodore (VT)5.7 i V8 SS | 340 hp 254 kW |
AUDI A8L (D3/4E) Facelift 2005 4.2 FSI V8 has 10 hp more than Holden Commodore (VT) 5.7 i V8 SS.
The biggest power difference is between Holden Commodore (VT) 5.7 i V8 SS and AUDI A8L (D3/4E) Facelift 2005 4.2 FSI V8: 10 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA8L (D3/4E)Facelift 20054.2 FSI V8 | 440 Nm 325 lb-ft |
| HoldenCommodore (VT)5.7 i V8 SS | 470 Nm 347 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA8L (D3/4E)Facelift 20054.2 FSI V8 | 1,850 kg 4,079 lb |
| HoldenCommodore (VT)5.7 i V8 SS | 1,640 kg 3,616 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA8L (D3/4E)Facelift 20054.2 FSI V8 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| HoldenCommodore (VT)5.7 i V8 SS | 234 km/h 145 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA8L (D3/4E)Facelift 20054.2 FSI V8 | 6.3 s |
| HoldenCommodore (VT)5.7 i V8 SS | 6.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI A8L (D3/4E) Facelift 2005 4.2 FSI V8 and Holden Commodore (VT) 5.7 i V8 SS: 0.6 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA8L (D3/4E)Facelift 20054.2 FSI V8 | 189 hp/t 141 kW/t 5.3 kg/hp |
| HoldenCommodore (VT)5.7 i V8 SS | 207 hp/t 155 kW/t 4.8 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA8L (D3/4E)Facelift 20054.2 FSI V8 | 350 hp 261 kW | 6.3 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| HoldenCommodore (VT)5.7 i V8 SS | 340 hp 254 kW | 6.9 s | 234 km/h 145 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA8L (D3/4E)Facelift 20054.2 FSI V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| HoldenCommodore (VT)5.7 i V8 SS |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDIA8L (D3/4E)Facelift 20054.2 FSI V8 | HoldenCommodore (VT)5.7 i V8 SS | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 350 hp 261 kW | 340 hp 254 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 440 Nm 325 lb-ft | 470 Nm 347 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.3 s | 6.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | 234 km/h 145 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,850 kg 4,079 lb | 1,640 kg 3,616 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 10.9 L/100 km 21.6 mpg US 25.9 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 826 km 513 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 500 L 17.7 cu ft | 475 L 16.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 189 hp/t 141 kW/t 5.3 kg/hp | 207 hp/t 155 kW/t 4.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI A8L (D3/4E) Facelift 2005 4.2 FSI V8 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 10.9 L/100 km21.6 mpg US25.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 19.08 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 30.70 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,635 L432 US gal360 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,861 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI A8L (D3/4E) Facelift 2005 4.2 FSI V8
- Has 10 hp more
- Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 31 km/h (19 mph) higher top speed
- Has 25 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
Holden Commodore (VT) 5.7 i V8 SS
- Has 30 Nm more
- Is 210 kg lighter
- Has 18 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























