Nissan Cedric (Y34)
Car comparison
Nissan Cedric (Y34) 3.0i V6vsHolden Calais (VT) 3.8i V6 SC
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonHolden Calais (VT)
3.8i V6 SC
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Nissan Cedric (Y34) 3.0i V6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.5 s
- Fastest top speed235 km/h146 mph
- Most powerful240 hp179 kW
- Lightest1,600 kg3,527 lb
- Best power-to-weight150 hp/t112 kW/t6.7 kg/hp
- Best overall score60/100
- Best performance score52/100
- Best economy score76/100
- Best practicality score78/100
Holden Calais (VT) 3.8i V6 SC
- Highest torque375 Nm277 lb-ft
Specification comparison
| Model | NissanCedric (Y34)3.0i V6 | HoldenCalais (VT)3.8i V6 SC |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 240hp179kW | 233hp174kW |
| Torque | 309Nm228lb-ft | 375Nm277lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,600kg3,527lb | 1,655kg3,649lb |
| Gross weight | 1,875kg4,134lb | - |
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | 226 km/h 140 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 69.4s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated | 69.6s99% target: 224 km/h / 139 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.5s | 7.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 27.4s Calculated | 31.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.1s Calculated | 7.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 11.4L/100 km20.6mpg US24.8mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 13L/100 km18.1mpg US21.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.4s Calculated | 15.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 150hp/t112kW/t68hp/1000 lb Calculated | 141hp/t105kW/t64hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 193Nm/t129lb-ft/ton Calculated | 227Nm/t152lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 702km436mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 2,987cc182cu in | 3,791cc231cu in |
| Length | 4,860mm191in | 4,964mm195in |
| Width | 1,770mm70in | 1,842mm73in |
| Height | 1,450mm57in | 1,450mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,800mm110in | 2,788mm110in |
| Front track | 1,510mm59in | 1,569mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,510mm59in | 1,587mm62in |
| Ground clearance | 150mm6in | - |
| Trunk volume | - | 475L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 80L | 75L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Nissan Cedric (Y34) 3.0i V6: Power / Torque
- Holden Calais (VT) 3.8i V6 SC: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| NissanCedric (Y34)3.0i V6 | 6,400 rpm | 3,600 rpm | 6,650 rpm |
| HoldenCalais (VT)3.8i V6 SC | 5,200 rpm | 3,000 rpm | 5,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | NissanCedric (Y34)3.0i V6 | HoldenCalais (VT)3.8i V6 SC |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.1 s | 7.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.5 s | 7.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 27.4 s | 31.4 s |
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | 226 km/h 140 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.9 s | 7.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.2 s | 10.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.0 s | 13.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.4 s | 15.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 156 km/h 97 mph | 152 km/h 95 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| NissanCedric (Y34)3.0i V6 | 240 hp 179 kW |
| HoldenCalais (VT)3.8i V6 SC | 233 hp 174 kW |
Nissan Cedric (Y34) 3.0i V6 has 7 hp more than Holden Calais (VT) 3.8i V6 SC.
The biggest power difference is between Holden Calais (VT) 3.8i V6 SC and Nissan Cedric (Y34) 3.0i V6: 7 hp (5 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| NissanCedric (Y34)3.0i V6 | 309 Nm 228 lb-ft |
| HoldenCalais (VT)3.8i V6 SC | 375 Nm 277 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| NissanCedric (Y34)3.0i V6 | 1,600 kg 3,527 lb |
| HoldenCalais (VT)3.8i V6 SC | 1,655 kg 3,649 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| NissanCedric (Y34)3.0i V6 | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| HoldenCalais (VT)3.8i V6 SC | 226 km/h 140 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| NissanCedric (Y34)3.0i V6 | 7.5 s |
| HoldenCalais (VT)3.8i V6 SC | 7.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Nissan Cedric (Y34) 3.0i V6 and Holden Calais (VT) 3.8i V6 SC: 0.4 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| NissanCedric (Y34)3.0i V6 | 150 hp/t 112 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp |
| HoldenCalais (VT)3.8i V6 SC | 141 hp/t 105 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| NissanCedric (Y34)3.0i V6 | 240 hp 179 kW | 7.5 s | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| HoldenCalais (VT)3.8i V6 SC | 233 hp 174 kW | 7.9 s | 226 km/h 140 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NissanCedric (Y34)3.0i V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| HoldenCalais (VT)3.8i V6 SC |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | NissanCedric (Y34)3.0i V6 | HoldenCalais (VT)3.8i V6 SC | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 240 hp 179 kW | 233 hp 174 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 309 Nm 228 lb-ft | 375 Nm 277 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.5 s | 7.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | 226 km/h 140 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,600 kg 3,527 lb | 1,655 kg 3,649 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 11.4 L/100 km 20.6 mpg US 24.8 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 702 km 436 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | - | 475 L 16.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 150 hp/t 112 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp | 141 hp/t 105 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Nissan Cedric (Y34) 3.0i V6 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 11.4 L/100 km20.6 mpg US24.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 19.95 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 32.11 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,710 L452 US gal376 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,993 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Nissan Cedric (Y34) 3.0i V6
- Has 7 hp more
- Is 55 kg lighter
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 9 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Has 9 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Holden Calais (VT) 3.8i V6 SC
- Has 66 Nm more
Pros
- Highest torque
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























