Nissan Cedric (Y34)
Car comparison
Nissan Cedric (Y34) 2.5TvsHolden Calais (VT) 3.8i V6 SC
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonHolden Calais (VT)
3.8i V6 SC
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Nissan Cedric (Y34) 2.5T
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.8 s
- Fastest top speed235 km/h146 mph
- Most powerful250 hp186 kW
- Best power-to-weight145 hp/t108 kW/t6.9 kg/hp
- Best overall score60/100
- Best performance score52/100
- Best economy score74/100
- Best practicality score78/100
Holden Calais (VT) 3.8i V6 SC
- Highest torque375 Nm277 lb-ft
- Lightest1,655 kg3,649 lb
Specification comparison
| Model | NissanCedric (Y34)2.5T | HoldenCalais (VT)3.8i V6 SC |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 250hp186kW | 233hp174kW |
| Torque | 319Nm235lb-ft | 375Nm277lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,720kg3,792lb | 1,655kg3,649lb |
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | 226 km/h 140 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 73.6s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated | 69.6s99% target: 224 km/h / 139 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.8s | 7.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 28.9s Calculated | 31.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.4s Calculated | 7.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 12.1L/100 km19.4mpg US23.3mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 13L/100 km18.1mpg US21.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.6s Calculated | 15.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 145hp/t108kW/t66hp/1000 lb Calculated | 141hp/t105kW/t64hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 185Nm/t124lb-ft/ton Calculated | 227Nm/t152lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 661km411mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 2,498cc152cu in | 3,791cc231cu in |
| Length | 4,865mm192in | 4,964mm195in |
| Width | 1,770mm70in | 1,842mm73in |
| Height | 1,465mm58in | 1,450mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,800mm110in | 2,788mm110in |
| Front track | 1,510mm59in | 1,569mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,510mm59in | 1,587mm62in |
| Ground clearance | 145mm6in | - |
| Trunk volume | - | 475L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 80L | 75L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Nissan Cedric (Y34) 2.5T: Power / Torque
- Holden Calais (VT) 3.8i V6 SC: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| NissanCedric (Y34)2.5T | 6,400 rpm | 2,800 rpm | 6,650 rpm |
| HoldenCalais (VT)3.8i V6 SC | 5,200 rpm | 3,000 rpm | 5,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | NissanCedric (Y34)2.5T | HoldenCalais (VT)3.8i V6 SC |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.4 s | 7.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.8 s | 7.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 28.9 s | 31.4 s |
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | 226 km/h 140 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.8 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.0 s | 7.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.4 s | 10.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.2 s | 13.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.6 s | 15.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 154 km/h 96 mph | 152 km/h 95 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| NissanCedric (Y34)2.5T | 250 hp 186 kW |
| HoldenCalais (VT)3.8i V6 SC | 233 hp 174 kW |
Nissan Cedric (Y34) 2.5T has 17 hp more than Holden Calais (VT) 3.8i V6 SC.
The biggest power difference is between Holden Calais (VT) 3.8i V6 SC and Nissan Cedric (Y34) 2.5T: 17 hp (13 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| NissanCedric (Y34)2.5T | 319 Nm 235 lb-ft |
| HoldenCalais (VT)3.8i V6 SC | 375 Nm 277 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| NissanCedric (Y34)2.5T | 1,720 kg 3,792 lb |
| HoldenCalais (VT)3.8i V6 SC | 1,655 kg 3,649 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| NissanCedric (Y34)2.5T | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| HoldenCalais (VT)3.8i V6 SC | 226 km/h 140 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| NissanCedric (Y34)2.5T | 7.8 s |
| HoldenCalais (VT)3.8i V6 SC | 7.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Nissan Cedric (Y34) 2.5T and Holden Calais (VT) 3.8i V6 SC: 0.1 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| NissanCedric (Y34)2.5T | 145 hp/t 108 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp |
| HoldenCalais (VT)3.8i V6 SC | 141 hp/t 105 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| NissanCedric (Y34)2.5T | 250 hp 186 kW | 7.8 s | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| HoldenCalais (VT)3.8i V6 SC | 233 hp 174 kW | 7.9 s | 226 km/h 140 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NissanCedric (Y34)2.5T |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| HoldenCalais (VT)3.8i V6 SC |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | NissanCedric (Y34)2.5T | HoldenCalais (VT)3.8i V6 SC | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 250 hp 186 kW | 233 hp 174 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 319 Nm 235 lb-ft | 375 Nm 277 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.8 s | 7.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | 226 km/h 140 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,720 kg 3,792 lb | 1,655 kg 3,649 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 12.1 L/100 km 19.4 mpg US 23.3 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 661 km 411 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | - | 475 L 16.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 145 hp/t 108 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp | 141 hp/t 105 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Nissan Cedric (Y34) 2.5T |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 12.1 L/100 km19.4 mpg US23.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 21.18 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 34.08 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,815 L479 US gal399 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,176 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Nissan Cedric (Y34) 2.5T
- Has 17 hp more
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 9 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Has 5 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Heaviest
Holden Calais (VT) 3.8i V6 SC
- Has 56 Nm more
- Is 65 kg lighter
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lightest
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























