Car comparison

Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C192) 63 S E PERFORMANCE V8vsGenesis GV60 · Facelift 2025 Magma 84 kWh

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C192)

63 S E PERFORMANCE V8

612 hp3982 ccHybridAWDAutomaticTurbochargedCoupe2024-present
VS

Genesis GV60 · Facelift 2025

Magma 84 kWh

650 hpElectricAWDAutomaticCoupe2026-present

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C192) 63 S E PERFORMANCE V8

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    2.8 s
  • Fastest top speed
    330 km/h
    205 mph Unrestricted
    320 km/h
    199 mph Restricted
  • Highest torque
    850 Nm
    627 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    2,120 kg
    4,674 lb
  • Best performance score
    93/100
  • Best economy score
    85/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelMercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)63 S E PERFORMANCE V8GenesisGV60Facelift 2025Magma 84 kWh
Power
612hp456kW
650hp485kW
Torque
850Nm627lb-ft
790Nm583lb-ft
Curb weight
2,120kg4,674lb
2,250kg4,960lb
Gross weight
2,365kg5,214lb
-
Top speed
Unrestricted
330 km/h205 mph
Restricted
320 km/h199 mph
Calculated
264 km/h
164 mph
To 99% top speed
49.2s99% target: 327 km/h / 203 mph
Calculated
38.4s99% target: 261 km/h / 162 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
2.8s
3.4s
0-200 km/h
8.1s
Calculated
10.9s
0-60 mph
2.7s
Calculated
3.2s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
8.2L/100 km28.7mpg US34.4mpg UK
-
Quarter mile
10.3s
Calculated
11.3s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
289hp/t215kW/t131hp/1000 lb
Calculated
289hp/t215kW/t131hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
401Nm/t268lb-ft/ton
Calculated
351Nm/t235lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
854km530mi
Calculated
-
Displacement
3,982cc243cu in
-
Length
4,728mm186in
4,635mm182in
Width
1,984mm78in
1,940mm76in
Height
1,354mm53in
1,560mm61in
Wheelbase
2,700mm106in
2,900mm114in
Front track
1,683mm66in
1,670mm66in
Rear track
1,686mm66in
1,685mm66in
Trunk volume
182L
-
Max trunk volume
562L
-
Doors
3
5
Seats
4
5
Fuel tank
70L
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricMercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)63 S E PERFORMANCE V8GenesisGV60Facelift 2025Magma 84 kWh
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
2.7 s
3.2 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
2.8 s
3.4 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
8.1 s
10.9 s
0-200 mph
0-322 km/h
38.5 s
-
Top speed
Unrestricted
330 km/h205 mph
Restricted
320 km/h199 mph
Limited
264 km/h
164 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
1.7 s
1.9 s
330 ft
101 m
4.5 s
4.9 s
1/8 mile
201 m
6.7 s
7.3 s
1000 ft
305 m
8.7 s
9.5 s
1/4 mile
402 m
10.3 s
11.3 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
225 km/h
140 mph
203 km/h
126 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)63 S E PERFORMANCE V8
612 hp
456 kW
GenesisGV60Facelift 2025Magma 84 kWh
650 hp
485 kW

Genesis GV60 Facelift 2025 Magma 84 kWh has 38 hp more than Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C192) 63 S E PERFORMANCE V8.

The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C192) 63 S E PERFORMANCE V8 and Genesis GV60 Facelift 2025 Magma 84 kWh: 38 hp (28 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)63 S E PERFORMANCE V8
850 Nm
627 lb-ft
GenesisGV60Facelift 2025Magma 84 kWh
790 Nm
583 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)63 S E PERFORMANCE V8
2,120 kg
4,674 lb
GenesisGV60Facelift 2025Magma 84 kWh
2,250 kg
4,960 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)63 S E PERFORMANCE V8
Unrestricted
330 km/h205 mph
Restricted
320 km/h199 mph
GenesisGV60Facelift 2025Magma 84 kWh
264 km/h
164 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)63 S E PERFORMANCE V82.8 s
GenesisGV60Facelift 2025Magma 84 kWh3.4 s

Although Genesis GV60 Facelift 2025 Magma 84 kWh has more power, Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C192) 63 S E PERFORMANCE V8 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C192) 63 S E PERFORMANCE V8 and Genesis GV60 Facelift 2025 Magma 84 kWh: 0.6 s.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)63 S E PERFORMANCE V8
289 hp/t
215 kW/t
3.5 kg/hp
GenesisGV60Facelift 2025Magma 84 kWh
289 hp/t
215 kW/t
3.5 kg/hp

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)63 S E PERFORMANCE V8
612 hp
456 kW
2.8 s
Unrestricted
330 km/h205 mph
Restricted
320 km/h199 mph
GenesisGV60Facelift 2025Magma 84 kWh
650 hp
485 kW
3.4 s
264 km/h
164 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)63 S E PERFORMANCE V8
Power
612 hp
456 kW
0-100 km/h2.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
330 km/h205 mph
Restricted
320 km/h199 mph
Doors/seats
3 doors
4 seats
Trunk
182 L
6.4 cu ft
Length
4,728 mm
186.1 in
Height
1,354 mm
53.3 in
GenesisGV60Facelift 2025Magma 84 kWh
Power
650 hp
485 kW
0-100 km/h3.4 s
Top speed
264 km/h
164 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,635 mm
182.5 in
Height
1,560 mm
61.4 in

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleMercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)63 S E PERFORMANCE V8GenesisGV60Facelift 2025Magma 84 kWh
Power
612 hp
456 kW
650 hp
485 kW
Torque
850 Nm
627 lb-ft
790 Nm
583 lb-ft
Acceleration
2.8 s
3.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
330 km/h205 mph
Restricted
320 km/h199 mph
264 km/h
164 mph
Lightness
2,120 kg
4,674 lb
2,250 kg
4,960 lb
Fuel consumption
8.2 L/100 km
28.7 mpg US
34.4 mpg UK
-
Practicality
Doors/seats
3 doors
4 seats
Trunk
182 L
6.4 cu ft
Length
4,728 mm
186.1 in
Height
1,354 mm
53.3 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,635 mm
182.5 in
Height
1,560 mm
61.4 in
Range score
854 km
530 mi
-
Trunk score
182 L
6.4 cu ft
-
Power-to-weight score
289 hp/t
215 kW/t
3.5 kg/hp
289 hp/t
215 kW/t
3.5 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleMercedes-Benz AMG GT (C192) 63 S E PERFORMANCE V8
Consumption8.2 L/100 km28.7 mpg US34.4 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km14.35 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi23.09 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,230 L325 US gal271 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,153 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C192) 63 S E PERFORMANCE V8

  • Has 60 Nm more
  • Is 130 kg lighter
  • Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 66 km/h (41 mph) higher top speed

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest

Cons

  • Lowest power

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C192) 63 S E PERFORMANCE V8
Genesis GV60 Magma 84 kWh
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

63 S E PERFORMANCE V8
R 4.0 V8
VS
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)63 S E PERFORMANCE V8vsMercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)Facelift 2017R 4.0 V8
Magma 84 kWh
Turbo GT 4.0 V8
VS
GenesisGV60Facelift 2025Magma 84 kWhvsPorscheCayenne IIIFacelift 2023Turbo GT 4.0 V8
63 S E PERFORMANCE V8
S 4.0 V8
VS
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)63 S E PERFORMANCE V8vsMercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)S 4.0 V8
Magma 84 kWh
AMG GLE 63 S V8
VS
GenesisGV60Facelift 2025Magma 84 kWhvsMercedes-BenzGLE Coupe (C167)Facelift 2023AMG GLE 63 S V8
63 S E PERFORMANCE V8
C 4.0 V8
VS
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)63 S E PERFORMANCE V8vsMercedes-BenzAMG GT Roadster (R190)C 4.0 V8
Magma 84 kWh
Trofeo 3.0 V6
VS
GenesisGV60Facelift 2025Magma 84 kWhvsMaseratiGranTurismo IIFacelift 2026Trofeo 3.0 V6
Magma 84 kWh
Competition 4.4 V8
VS
GenesisGV60Facelift 2025Magma 84 kWhvsBMWM8 Gran Coupe (F93)Facelift 2022Competition 4.4 V8
63 S E PERFORMANCE V8
AMG GLE 63 S V8
VS
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)63 S E PERFORMANCE V8vsMercedes-BenzGLE Coupe (C167)AMG GLE 63 S V8
Magma 84 kWh
63 PRO V8
VS
GenesisGV60Facelift 2025Magma 84 kWhvsMercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)63 PRO V8
63 S E PERFORMANCE V8
AMG S 63
VS
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)63 S E PERFORMANCE V8vsMercedes-BenzS-class Coupe (C217)Facelift 2017AMG S 63
Magma 84 kWh
Competition 4.4 V8
VS
GenesisGV60Facelift 2025Magma 84 kWhvsBMWM8 Coupe (F92)Facelift 2022Competition 4.4 V8
63 S E PERFORMANCE V8
AMG C 63 S V8
VS
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)63 S E PERFORMANCE V8vsMercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)Facelift 2018AMG C 63 S V8
Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C192) 63 S E PERFORMANCE V8 vs Genesis GV60 · Facelift 2025 Magma 84 kWh - car comparison - FastVsFaster