Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C192)
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C192) 63 PRO V8vsGenesis GV60 · Facelift 2025 Magma 84 kWh
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonGenesis GV60 · Facelift 2025
Magma 84 kWh
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C192) 63 PRO V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.2 s
- Fastest top speed330 km/h205 mph Unrestricted317 km/h197 mph Restricted
- Highest torque850 Nm627 lb-ft
- Lightest1,875 kg4,134 lb
- Best power-to-weight326 hp/t243 kW/t3.1 kg/hp
- Best performance score93/100
- Best economy score69/100
Genesis GV60 Facelift 2025 Magma 84 kWh
- Most powerful650 hp485 kW
- Best overall score81/100
- Best practicality score71/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)63 PRO V8 | GenesisGV60Facelift 2025Magma 84 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 612hp456kW | 650hp485kW |
| Torque | 850Nm627lb-ft | 790Nm583lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,875kg4,134lb | 2,250kg4,960lb |
| Gross weight | 2,130kg4,696lb | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 330 km/h205 mph Restricted 317 km/h197 mph Calculated | 264 km/h 164 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 86.0s99% target: 327 km/h / 203 mph Calculated | 38.4s99% target: 261 km/h / 162 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.2s | 3.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 10.9s | 10.9s |
| 0-60 mph | 3.0s Calculated | 3.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 14L/100 km16.8mpg US20.2mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 11.1s Calculated | 11.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 326hp/t243kW/t148hp/1000 lb Calculated | 289hp/t215kW/t131hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 453Nm/t303lb-ft/ton Calculated | 351Nm/t235lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 500km311mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 3,982cc243cu in | - |
| Length | 4,728mm186in | 4,635mm182in |
| Width | 1,984mm78in | 1,940mm76in |
| Height | 1,354mm53in | 1,560mm61in |
| Wheelbase | 2,700mm106in | 2,900mm114in |
| Front track | 1,683mm66in | 1,670mm66in |
| Rear track | 1,686mm66in | 1,685mm66in |
| Trunk volume | 321L | - |
| Max trunk volume | 675L | - |
| Doors | 3 | 5 |
| Seats | 2 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)63 PRO V8 | GenesisGV60Facelift 2025Magma 84 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.0 s | 3.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.2 s | 3.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 10.9 s | 10.9 s |
0-200 mph 0-322 km/h | 64.9 s | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 330 km/h205 mph Restricted 317 km/h197 mph Limited | 264 km/h 164 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 1.7 s | 1.9 s |
330 ft 101 m | 4.7 s | 4.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.2 s | 7.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 9.3 s | 9.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 11.1 s | 11.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 202 km/h 126 mph | 203 km/h 126 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)63 PRO V8 | 612 hp 456 kW |
| GenesisGV60Facelift 2025Magma 84 kWh | 650 hp 485 kW |
Genesis GV60 Facelift 2025 Magma 84 kWh has 38 hp more than Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C192) 63 PRO V8.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C192) 63 PRO V8 and Genesis GV60 Facelift 2025 Magma 84 kWh: 38 hp (28 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)63 PRO V8 | 850 Nm 627 lb-ft |
| GenesisGV60Facelift 2025Magma 84 kWh | 790 Nm 583 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)63 PRO V8 | 1,875 kg 4,134 lb |
| GenesisGV60Facelift 2025Magma 84 kWh | 2,250 kg 4,960 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)63 PRO V8 | Unrestricted 330 km/h205 mph Restricted 317 km/h197 mph |
| GenesisGV60Facelift 2025Magma 84 kWh | 264 km/h 164 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)63 PRO V8 | 3.2 s |
| GenesisGV60Facelift 2025Magma 84 kWh | 3.4 s |
Although Genesis GV60 Facelift 2025 Magma 84 kWh has more power, Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C192) 63 PRO V8 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C192) 63 PRO V8 and Genesis GV60 Facelift 2025 Magma 84 kWh: 0.2 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)63 PRO V8 | 326 hp/t 243 kW/t 3.1 kg/hp |
| GenesisGV60Facelift 2025Magma 84 kWh | 289 hp/t 215 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)63 PRO V8 | 612 hp 456 kW | 3.2 s | Unrestricted 330 km/h205 mph Restricted 317 km/h197 mph |
| GenesisGV60Facelift 2025Magma 84 kWh | 650 hp 485 kW | 3.4 s | 264 km/h 164 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)63 PRO V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| GenesisGV60Facelift 2025Magma 84 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)63 PRO V8 | GenesisGV60Facelift 2025Magma 84 kWh | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 612 hp 456 kW | 650 hp 485 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 850 Nm 627 lb-ft | 790 Nm 583 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.2 s | 3.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 330 km/h205 mph Restricted 317 km/h197 mph | 264 km/h 164 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,875 kg 4,134 lb | 2,250 kg 4,960 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 14.0 L/100 km 16.8 mpg US 20.2 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 500 km 311 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 321 L 11.3 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 326 hp/t 243 kW/t 3.1 kg/hp | 289 hp/t 215 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C192) 63 PRO V8 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 14 L/100 km16.8 mpg US20.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 24.50 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 39.43 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 2,100 L555 US gal462 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,675 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C192) 63 PRO V8
- Has 60 Nm more
- Is 375 kg lighter
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 66 km/h (41 mph) higher top speed
- Has 38 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
Genesis GV60 Facelift 2025 Magma 84 kWh
- Has 38 hp more
Pros
- Most powerful
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























