Mercedes-Benz GLC Coupe (C253)
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz GLC Coupe (C253) GLC 300vsGeely Tugella 2.0
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonGeely Tugella
2.0
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz GLC Coupe (C253) GLC 300
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.5 s
- Fastest top speed236 km/h147 mph
- Most powerful245 hp183 kW
- Highest torque370 Nm273 lb-ft
- Lightest1,710 kg3,770 lb
- Best power-to-weight143 hp/t107 kW/t7.0 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.8 L/100 km30.2 mpg US36.2 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption9.4 L/100 km25.0 mpg US30.1 mpg UK
- Best estimated range846 km526 mi
- Largest trunk500 L
- Best overall score58/100
- Best performance score56/100
- Best economy score86/100
Geely Tugella 2.0
- Lowest highway consumption6.3 L/100 km37.3 mpg US44.8 mpg UK
- Best practicality score69/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C253)GLC 300 | GeelyTugella2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 245hp183kW | 238hp177kW |
| Torque | 370Nm273lb-ft | 350Nm258lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,710kg3,770lb | 1,815kg4,001lb |
| Gross weight | 2,430kg5,357lb | - |
| Top speed | 236 km/h 147 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 93.2s99% target: 234 km/h / 145 mph Calculated | 92.4s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.5s | 6.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 30.3s Calculated | 40.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.1s Calculated | 6.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK | 8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 9.4L/100 km25mpg US30.1mpg UK | 11.4L/100 km20.6mpg US24.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK | 6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.6s Calculated | 15.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 143hp/t107kW/t65hp/1000 lb Calculated | 131hp/t98kW/t59hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 216Nm/t145lb-ft/ton Calculated | 193Nm/t129lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 846km526mi Calculated | 654km407mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,991cc121cu in | 1,969cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,732mm186in | 4,605mm181in |
| Width | 1,890mm74in | 1,878mm74in |
| Height | 1,602mm63in | 1,643mm65in |
| Wheelbase | 2,873mm113in | 2,700mm106in |
| Front track | 1,620mm64in | 1,600mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,619mm64in | 1,600mm63in |
| Ground clearance | - | 204mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 500L | 446L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,400L | - |
| Doors | 4 | 5 |
| Seats | 4 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 66L | 53L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz GLC Coupe (C253) GLC 300: Power / Torque
- Geely Tugella 2.0: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C253)GLC 300 | 5,500 rpm | 1,300-4,000 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| GeelyTugella2.0 | 5,500 rpm | 1,800-4,500 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C253)GLC 300 | GeelyTugella2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.1 s | 6.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.5 s | 6.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 30.3 s | 40.1 s |
| Top speed | 236 km/h 147 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.2 s | 6.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.5 s | 9.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.3 s | 12.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.6 s | 15.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 154 km/h 95 mph | 148 km/h 92 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C253)GLC 300 | 245 hp 183 kW |
| GeelyTugella2.0 | 238 hp 177 kW |
Mercedes-Benz GLC Coupe (C253) GLC 300 has 7 hp more than Geely Tugella 2.0.
The biggest power difference is between Geely Tugella 2.0 and Mercedes-Benz GLC Coupe (C253) GLC 300: 7 hp (5 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C253)GLC 300 | 370 Nm 273 lb-ft |
| GeelyTugella2.0 | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C253)GLC 300 | 1,710 kg 3,770 lb |
| GeelyTugella2.0 | 1,815 kg 4,001 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C253)GLC 300 | 236 km/h 147 mph |
| GeelyTugella2.0 | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C253)GLC 300 | 6.5 s |
| GeelyTugella2.0 | 6.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz GLC Coupe (C253) GLC 300 and Geely Tugella 2.0: 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C253)GLC 300 | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK |
| GeelyTugella2.0 | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C253)GLC 300 | 143 hp/t 107 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp |
| GeelyTugella2.0 | 131 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C253)GLC 300 | 846 km 526 mi |
| GeelyTugella2.0 | 654 km 407 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C253)GLC 300 | 245 hp 183 kW | 6.5 s | 236 km/h 147 mph |
| GeelyTugella2.0 | 238 hp 177 kW | 6.9 s | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C253)GLC 300 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| GeelyTugella2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C253)GLC 300 |
| 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| GeelyTugella2.0 |
| 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz GLC Coupe (C253) GLC 300 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C253)GLC 300 | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | 6.5 s |
| GeelyTugella2.0 | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK | 6.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C253)GLC 300 | 143 hp/t 107 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK |
| GeelyTugella2.0 | 131 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C253)GLC 300 | GeelyTugella2.0 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 245 hp 183 kW | 238 hp 177 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 370 Nm 273 lb-ft | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.5 s | 6.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 236 km/h 147 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,710 kg 3,770 lb | 1,815 kg 4,001 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 846 km 526 mi | 654 km 407 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 500 L 17.7 cu ft | 446 L 15.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 143 hp/t 107 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp | 131 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz GLC Coupe (C253) GLC 300 | Geely Tugella 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.8 L/100 km30.2 mpg US36.2 mpg UK | 8.1 L/100 km29 mpg US34.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 13.65 LC100 km | 14.17 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 21.97 LC100 mi | 22.81 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,170 L309 US gal257 UK gal | 1,215 L321 US gal267 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,048 LC/year | 2,126 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz GLC Coupe (C253) GLC 300
- Has 7 hp more
- Has 20 Nm more
- Is 105 kg lighter
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 16 km/h (10 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 12 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 192 km (119 mi) more estimated range
- Has 54 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Geely Tugella 2.0
No measurable advantages in the available data.
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























