Mercedes-Benz GLC Coupe (C254)
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz GLC Coupe (C254) GLC 300vsMercedes-Benz GLC Coupe (C253) GLC 300
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz GLC Coupe (C253)
GLC 300
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz GLC Coupe (C254) GLC 300
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.3 s
- Fastest top speed246 km/h153 mph
- Most powerful258 hp192 kW
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Largest trunk545 L
- Best overall score62/100
- Best performance score58/100
- Best practicality score72/100
Mercedes-Benz GLC Coupe (C253) GLC 300
- Lightest1,710 kg3,770 lb
- Best power-to-weight143 hp/t107 kW/t7.0 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.8 L/100 km30.2 mpg US36.2 mpg UK
- Best estimated range846 km526 mi
- Best economy score86/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C254)GLC 300 | Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C253)GLC 300 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 258hp192kW | 245hp183kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 370Nm273lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,945kg4,288lb | 1,710kg3,770lb |
| Gross weight | 2,510kg5,534lb | 2,430kg5,357lb |
| Top speed | 246 km/h 153 mph | 236 km/h 147 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 101.0s99% target: 244 km/h / 151 mph Calculated | 93.2s99% target: 234 km/h / 145 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.3s | 6.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 27.9s Calculated | 30.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.9s Calculated | 6.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.2L/100 km28.7mpg US34.4mpg UK | 7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 9.4L/100 km25mpg US30.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.5s Calculated | 14.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 133hp/t99kW/t60hp/1000 lb Calculated | 143hp/t107kW/t65hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 206Nm/t138lb-ft/ton Calculated | 216Nm/t145lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 756km470mi Calculated | 846km526mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,999cc122cu in | 1,991cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,769mm188in | 4,732mm186in |
| Width | 1,920mm76in | 1,890mm74in |
| Height | 1,606mm63in | 1,602mm63in |
| Wheelbase | 2,888mm114in | 2,873mm113in |
| Front track | 1,628mm64in | 1,620mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,642mm65in | 1,619mm64in |
| Ground clearance | 158mm6in | - |
| Trunk volume | 545L | 500L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,490L | 1,400L |
| Doors | 5 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 62L | 66L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz GLC Coupe (C254) GLC 300: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz GLC Coupe (C253) GLC 300: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C254)GLC 300 | 5,800 rpm | 2,000-3,200 rpm | 6,050 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C253)GLC 300 | 5,500 rpm | 1,300-4,000 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C254)GLC 300 | Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C253)GLC 300 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.9 s | 6.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.3 s | 6.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 27.9 s | 30.3 s |
| Top speed | 246 km/h 153 mph | 236 km/h 147 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.1 s | 6.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.3 s | 9.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.1 s | 12.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.5 s | 14.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 156 km/h 97 mph | 154 km/h 95 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C254)GLC 300 | 258 hp 192 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C253)GLC 300 | 245 hp 183 kW |
Mercedes-Benz GLC Coupe (C254) GLC 300 has 13 hp more than Mercedes-Benz GLC Coupe (C253) GLC 300.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz GLC Coupe (C253) GLC 300 and Mercedes-Benz GLC Coupe (C254) GLC 300: 13 hp (10 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C254)GLC 300 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C253)GLC 300 | 370 Nm 273 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C254)GLC 300 | 1,945 kg 4,288 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C253)GLC 300 | 1,710 kg 3,770 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C254)GLC 300 | 246 km/h 153 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C253)GLC 300 | 236 km/h 147 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C254)GLC 300 | 6.3 s |
| Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C253)GLC 300 | 6.5 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz GLC Coupe (C254) GLC 300 and Mercedes-Benz GLC Coupe (C253) GLC 300: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C254)GLC 300 | 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C253)GLC 300 | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C254)GLC 300 | 133 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C253)GLC 300 | 143 hp/t 107 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C254)GLC 300 | 756 km 470 mi |
| Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C253)GLC 300 | 846 km 526 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C254)GLC 300 | 258 hp 192 kW | 6.3 s | 246 km/h 153 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C253)GLC 300 | 245 hp 183 kW | 6.5 s | 236 km/h 147 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C254)GLC 300 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C253)GLC 300 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C254)GLC 300 |
| 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C253)GLC 300 |
| 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz GLC Coupe (C254) GLC 300 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C254)GLC 300 | 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK | 6.3 s |
| Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C253)GLC 300 | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | 6.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C254)GLC 300 | 133 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp | 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C253)GLC 300 | 143 hp/t 107 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C254)GLC 300 | Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C253)GLC 300 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 258 hp 192 kW | 245 hp 183 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 370 Nm 273 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.3 s | 6.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 246 km/h 153 mph | 236 km/h 147 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,945 kg 4,288 lb | 1,710 kg 3,770 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 756 km 470 mi | 846 km 526 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 545 L 19.2 cu ft | 500 L 17.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 133 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp | 143 hp/t 107 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz GLC Coupe (C254) GLC 300 | Mercedes-Benz GLC Coupe (C253) GLC 300 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.2 L/100 km28.7 mpg US34.4 mpg UK | 7.8 L/100 km30.2 mpg US36.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 14.35 LC100 km | 13.65 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 23.09 LC100 mi | 21.97 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,230 L325 US gal271 UK gal | 1,170 L309 US gal257 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,153 LC/year | 2,048 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz GLC Coupe (C254) GLC 300
- Has 13 hp more
- Has 30 Nm more
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Has 45 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Mercedes-Benz GLC Coupe (C253) GLC 300
- Is 235 kg lighter
- Uses 0.4 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 11 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 90 km (56 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























