Hyundai Genesis II
Car comparison
Hyundai Genesis II 3.8 V6 GDIvsFord Taurus VII EcoBoost 325 V6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonFord Taurus VII
EcoBoost 325 V6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Ford Taurus VII EcoBoost 325 V6
- Most powerful329 hp245 kW
- Highest torque475 Nm350 lb-ft
- Lightest1,875 kg4,134 lb
- Best power-to-weight175 hp/t131 kW/t5.7 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption9.2 L/100 km25.6 mpg US30.7 mpg UK
- Best estimated range696 km432 mi
- Largest trunk534 L
- Best overall score67/100
- Best economy score82/100
- Best practicality score77/100
Hyundai Genesis II 3.8 V6 GDI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.5 s
- Fastest top speed255 km/h158 mph Unrestricted240 km/h149 mph Restricted
- Best performance score62/100
Specification comparison
| Model | HyundaiGenesis II3.8 V6 GDI | FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 325 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 315hp235kW | 329hp245kW |
| Torque | 397Nm293lb-ft | 475Nm350lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,920kg4,233lb | 1,875kg4,134lb |
| Gross weight | 2,470kg5,445lb | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 255 km/h158 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Calculated | 234 km/h 145 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 64.7s99% target: 252 km/h / 157 mph Calculated | 60.8s99% target: 232 km/h / 144 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.5s | 6.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 20.8s Calculated | 24.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.2s Calculated | 6.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 11.2L/100 km21mpg US25.2mpg UK | 9.2L/100 km25.6mpg US30.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 15.7L/100 km15mpg US18.0mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.6L/100 km27.4mpg US32.8mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 14.4s Calculated | 14.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 164hp/t122kW/t74hp/1000 lb Calculated | 175hp/t131kW/t80hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 207Nm/t138lb-ft/ton Calculated | 253Nm/t170lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 688km427mi Calculated | 696km432mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,778cc231cu in | 2,694cc164cu in |
| Length | 4,990mm196in | 4,996mm197in |
| Width | 1,890mm74in | 1,878mm74in |
| Height | 1,480mm58in | 1,503mm59in |
| Wheelbase | 3,010mm119in | 2,949mm116in |
| Front track | 1,620mm64in | 1,608mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,633mm64in | 1,618mm64in |
| Ground clearance | 130mm5in | 133mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 493L | 534L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 77L | 64L |
| CO2 emissions | 261g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Hyundai Genesis II 3.8 V6 GDI: Power / Torque
- Ford Taurus VII EcoBoost 325 V6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| HyundaiGenesis II3.8 V6 GDI | 6,000 rpm | 5,000 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 325 V6 | 5,500 rpm | 2,500-4,500 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | HyundaiGenesis II3.8 V6 GDI | FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 325 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.2 s | 6.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.5 s | 6.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 20.8 s | 24.8 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 255 km/h158 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Likely limited | 234 km/h 145 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.6 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.6 s | 9.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.3 s | 12.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.4 s | 14.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 168 km/h 105 mph | 162 km/h 100 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HyundaiGenesis II3.8 V6 GDI | 315 hp 235 kW |
| FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 325 V6 | 329 hp 245 kW |
Ford Taurus VII EcoBoost 325 V6 has 14 hp more than Hyundai Genesis II 3.8 V6 GDI.
The biggest power difference is between Hyundai Genesis II 3.8 V6 GDI and Ford Taurus VII EcoBoost 325 V6: 14 hp (10 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HyundaiGenesis II3.8 V6 GDI | 397 Nm 293 lb-ft |
| FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 325 V6 | 475 Nm 350 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HyundaiGenesis II3.8 V6 GDI | 1,920 kg 4,233 lb |
| FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 325 V6 | 1,875 kg 4,134 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HyundaiGenesis II3.8 V6 GDI | Unrestricted 255 km/h158 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
| FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 325 V6 | 234 km/h 145 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HyundaiGenesis II3.8 V6 GDI | 6.5 s |
| FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 325 V6 | 6.9 s |
Although Ford Taurus VII EcoBoost 325 V6 has more power, Hyundai Genesis II 3.8 V6 GDI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Hyundai Genesis II 3.8 V6 GDI and Ford Taurus VII EcoBoost 325 V6: 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HyundaiGenesis II3.8 V6 GDI | 11.2 L/100 km 21.0 mpg US 25.2 mpg UK |
| FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 325 V6 | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Ford Taurus VII EcoBoost 325 V6 and Hyundai Genesis II 3.8 V6 GDI: 2.0 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HyundaiGenesis II3.8 V6 GDI | 164 hp/t 122 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp |
| FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 325 V6 | 175 hp/t 131 kW/t 5.7 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HyundaiGenesis II3.8 V6 GDI | 688 km 427 mi |
| FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 325 V6 | 696 km 432 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| HyundaiGenesis II3.8 V6 GDI | 315 hp 235 kW | 6.5 s | Unrestricted 255 km/h158 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
| FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 325 V6 | 329 hp 245 kW | 6.9 s | 234 km/h 145 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HyundaiGenesis II3.8 V6 GDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 325 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HyundaiGenesis II3.8 V6 GDI |
| 11.2 L/100 km 21.0 mpg US 25.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 325 V6 |
| 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK | ||||||
Ford Taurus VII EcoBoost 325 V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| HyundaiGenesis II3.8 V6 GDI | 11.2 L/100 km 21.0 mpg US 25.2 mpg UK | 6.5 s |
| FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 325 V6 | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK | 6.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| HyundaiGenesis II3.8 V6 GDI | 164 hp/t 122 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp | 11.2 L/100 km 21.0 mpg US 25.2 mpg UK |
| FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 325 V6 | 175 hp/t 131 kW/t 5.7 kg/hp | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | HyundaiGenesis II3.8 V6 GDI | FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 325 V6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 315 hp 235 kW | 329 hp 245 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 397 Nm 293 lb-ft | 475 Nm 350 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.5 s | 6.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 255 km/h158 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph | 234 km/h 145 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,920 kg 4,233 lb | 1,875 kg 4,134 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 11.2 L/100 km 21.0 mpg US 25.2 mpg UK | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 688 km 427 mi | 696 km 432 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 261 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 493 L 17.4 cu ft | 534 L 18.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 164 hp/t 122 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp | 175 hp/t 131 kW/t 5.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Hyundai Genesis II 3.8 V6 GDI | Ford Taurus VII EcoBoost 325 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 11.2 L/100 km21 mpg US25.2 mpg UK | 9.2 L/100 km25.6 mpg US30.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 19.60 LC100 km | 16.10 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 31.54 LC100 mi | 25.91 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,680 L444 US gal370 UK gal | 1,380 L365 US gal304 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,940 LC/year | 2,415 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Hyundai Genesis II 3.8 V6 GDI
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 21 km/h (13 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Ford Taurus VII EcoBoost 325 V6
- Has 14 hp more
- Has 78 Nm more
- Is 45 kg lighter
- Uses 2.0 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 11 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 8 km (5 mi) more estimated range
- Has 41 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























