Volkswagen Sharan II · Facelift 2015
Car comparison
Volkswagen Sharan II · Facelift 2015 2.0 TSIvsFord S-MAX II 2.0 TDCi
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonFord S-MAX II
2.0 TDCi
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Ford S-MAX II 2.0 TDCi
- Most powerful210 hp157 kW
- Highest torque450 Nm332 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight119 hp/t89 kW/t8.4 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.5 L/100 km42.8 mpg US51.4 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption6.3 L/100 km37.3 mpg US44.8 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions144 g/km
- Best estimated range1,273 km791 mi
- Best economy score92/100
Volkswagen Sharan II Facelift 2015 2.0 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.8 s
- Fastest top speed226 km/h140 mph
- Lightest1,715 kg3,781 lb
- Largest trunk955 L
- Best overall score65/100
- Best performance score50/100
- Best practicality score96/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolkswagenSharan IIFacelift 20152.0 TSI | FordS-MAX II2.0 TDCi |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 200hp149kW | 210hp157kW |
| Torque | 350Nm258lb-ft | 450Nm332lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,715kg3,781lb | 1,766kg3,893lb |
| Gross weight | 3,260kg7,187lb | 2,575kg5,677lb |
| Top speed | 226 km/h 140 mph | 218 km/h 135 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 96.9s99% target: 224 km/h / 139 mph Calculated | 101.1s99% target: 216 km/h / 134 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.8s | 8.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 38.5s Calculated | 48.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.4s Calculated | 8.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK | 5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 9.3L/100 km25.3mpg US30.4mpg UK | 6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.6s Calculated | 16.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 117hp/t87kW/t53hp/1000 lb Calculated | 119hp/t89kW/t54hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 204Nm/t137lb-ft/ton Calculated | 255Nm/t170lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 959km596mi Calculated | 1,273km791mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,997cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,854mm191in | 4,796mm189in |
| Width | 1,904mm75in | 1,916mm75in |
| Height | 1,720mm68in | 1,655mm65in |
| Wheelbase | 2,920mm115in | 2,849mm112in |
| Front track | 1,571mm62in | 1,606mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,617mm64in | 1,606mm63in |
| Ground clearance | 152mm6in | 150mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 955L | 285L |
| Max trunk volume | 2,430L | 2,020L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 7 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 70L |
| CO2 emissions | 168g/km | 144g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volkswagen Sharan II Facelift 2015 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
- Ford S-MAX II 2.0 TDCi: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenSharan IIFacelift 20152.0 TSI | 4,500-6,200 rpm | 1,500-4,400 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
| FordS-MAX II2.0 TDCi | 3,750 rpm | 2,000-2,250 rpm | 4,000 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolkswagenSharan IIFacelift 20152.0 TSI | FordS-MAX II2.0 TDCi |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.4 s | 8.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.8 s | 8.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 38.5 s | 48.1 s |
| Top speed | 226 km/h 140 mph | 218 km/h 135 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.7 s | 7.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.2 s | 10.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.1 s | 13.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.6 s | 16.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 146 km/h 90 mph | 140 km/h 87 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenSharan IIFacelift 20152.0 TSI | 200 hp 149 kW |
| FordS-MAX II2.0 TDCi | 210 hp 157 kW |
Ford S-MAX II 2.0 TDCi has 10 hp more than Volkswagen Sharan II Facelift 2015 2.0 TSI.
The biggest power difference is between Volkswagen Sharan II Facelift 2015 2.0 TSI and Ford S-MAX II 2.0 TDCi: 10 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenSharan IIFacelift 20152.0 TSI | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
| FordS-MAX II2.0 TDCi | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenSharan IIFacelift 20152.0 TSI | 1,715 kg 3,781 lb |
| FordS-MAX II2.0 TDCi | 1,766 kg 3,893 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenSharan IIFacelift 20152.0 TSI | 226 km/h 140 mph |
| FordS-MAX II2.0 TDCi | 218 km/h 135 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenSharan IIFacelift 20152.0 TSI | 7.8 s |
| FordS-MAX II2.0 TDCi | 8.8 s |
Although Ford S-MAX II 2.0 TDCi has more power, Volkswagen Sharan II Facelift 2015 2.0 TSI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen Sharan II Facelift 2015 2.0 TSI and Ford S-MAX II 2.0 TDCi: 1.0 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenSharan IIFacelift 20152.0 TSI | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK |
| FordS-MAX II2.0 TDCi | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Ford S-MAX II 2.0 TDCi and Volkswagen Sharan II Facelift 2015 2.0 TSI: 1.8 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenSharan IIFacelift 20152.0 TSI | 117 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.6 kg/hp |
| FordS-MAX II2.0 TDCi | 119 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenSharan IIFacelift 20152.0 TSI | 959 km 596 mi |
| FordS-MAX II2.0 TDCi | 1,273 km 791 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenSharan IIFacelift 20152.0 TSI | 200 hp 149 kW | 7.8 s | 226 km/h 140 mph |
| FordS-MAX II2.0 TDCi | 210 hp 157 kW | 8.8 s | 218 km/h 135 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenSharan IIFacelift 20152.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| FordS-MAX II2.0 TDCi |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenSharan IIFacelift 20152.0 TSI |
| 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| FordS-MAX II2.0 TDCi |
| 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Ford S-MAX II 2.0 TDCi is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenSharan IIFacelift 20152.0 TSI | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK | 7.8 s |
| FordS-MAX II2.0 TDCi | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK | 8.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenSharan IIFacelift 20152.0 TSI | 117 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.6 kg/hp | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK |
| FordS-MAX II2.0 TDCi | 119 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolkswagenSharan IIFacelift 20152.0 TSI | FordS-MAX II2.0 TDCi | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 200 hp 149 kW | 210 hp 157 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.8 s | 8.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 226 km/h 140 mph | 218 km/h 135 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,715 kg 3,781 lb | 1,766 kg 3,893 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 959 km 596 mi | 1,273 km 791 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 168 g/km | 144 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 955 L 33.7 cu ft | 285 L 10.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 117 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.6 kg/hp | 119 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volkswagen Sharan II Facelift 2015 2.0 TSI | Ford S-MAX II 2.0 TDCi |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.3 L/100 km32.2 mpg US38.7 mpg UK | 5.5 L/100 km42.8 mpg US51.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.78 LC100 km | 9.63 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 20.56 LC100 mi | 15.49 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,095 L289 US gal241 UK gal | 825 L218 US gal181 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,916 LC/year | 1,444 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volkswagen Sharan II Facelift 2015 2.0 TSI
- Is 51 kg lighter
- Is 1.0 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 8 km/h (5 mph) higher top speed
- Has 670 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Highest CO2 emissions
Ford S-MAX II 2.0 TDCi
- Has 10 hp more
- Has 100 Nm more
- Uses 1.8 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 2 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 314 km (195 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 24 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























