Ford S-MAX II
Car comparison
Ford S-MAX II 2.0 TDCivsVolkswagen Sharan II · Facelift 2015 2.0 TDI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolkswagen Sharan II · Facelift 2015
2.0 TDI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Ford S-MAX II 2.0 TDCi
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.8 s
- Fastest top speed218 km/h135 mph
- Most powerful210 hp157 kW
- Highest torque450 Nm332 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight119 hp/t89 kW/t8.4 kg/hp
- Lowest city consumption6.3 L/100 km37.3 mpg US44.8 mpg UK
- Largest trunk700 L
- Best overall score64/100
- Best performance score49/100
- Best practicality score95/100
Volkswagen Sharan II Facelift 2015 2.0 TDI
- Lightest1,725 kg3,803 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.3 L/100 km44.4 mpg US53.3 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.5 L/100 km52.3 mpg US62.8 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions139 g/km
- Best estimated range1,321 km821 mi
- Best economy score93/100
Specification comparison
| Model | FordS-MAX II2.0 TDCi | VolkswagenSharan IIFacelift 20152.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 210hp157kW | 184hp137kW |
| Torque | 450Nm332lb-ft | 380Nm280lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,766kg3,893lb | 1,725kg3,803lb |
| Gross weight | 2,575kg5,677lb | 2,400kg5,291lb |
| Top speed | 218 km/h 135 mph | 215 km/h 134 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 101.8s99% target: 216 km/h / 134 mph Calculated | 104.3s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.8s | 8.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 48.3s Calculated | 53.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 8.3s Calculated | 8.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK | 5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK | 6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK | 4.5L/100 km52.3mpg US62.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.4s Calculated | 16.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 119hp/t89kW/t54hp/1000 lb Calculated | 107hp/t80kW/t48hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 255Nm/t170lb-ft/ton Calculated | 220Nm/t147lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,273km791mi Calculated | 1,321km821mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,997cc122cu in | 1,968cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,796mm189in | 4,854mm191in |
| Width | 1,916mm75in | 1,904mm75in |
| Height | 1,655mm65in | 1,720mm68in |
| Wheelbase | 2,849mm112in | 2,920mm115in |
| Front track | 1,606mm63in | 1,571mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,606mm63in | 1,617mm64in |
| Ground clearance | 150mm6in | 152mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 700L | 300L |
| Max trunk volume | 2,200L | 2,297L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 7 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 70L |
| CO2 emissions | 144g/km | 139g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Ford S-MAX II 2.0 TDCi: Power / Torque
- Volkswagen Sharan II Facelift 2015 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| FordS-MAX II2.0 TDCi | 3,750 rpm | 2,000-2,250 rpm | 4,000 rpm |
| VolkswagenSharan IIFacelift 20152.0 TDI | 3,500-4,000 rpm | 1,750-3,250 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | FordS-MAX II2.0 TDCi | VolkswagenSharan IIFacelift 20152.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.3 s | 8.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.8 s | 8.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 48.3 s | 53.1 s |
| Top speed | 218 km/h 135 mph | 215 km/h 134 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.0 s | 7.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.6 s | 10.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.8 s | 13.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.4 s | 16.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 140 km/h 87 mph | 138 km/h 86 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordS-MAX II2.0 TDCi | 210 hp 157 kW |
| VolkswagenSharan IIFacelift 20152.0 TDI | 184 hp 137 kW |
Ford S-MAX II 2.0 TDCi has 26 hp more than Volkswagen Sharan II Facelift 2015 2.0 TDI.
The biggest power difference is between Volkswagen Sharan II Facelift 2015 2.0 TDI and Ford S-MAX II 2.0 TDCi: 26 hp (19 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordS-MAX II2.0 TDCi | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft |
| VolkswagenSharan IIFacelift 20152.0 TDI | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordS-MAX II2.0 TDCi | 1,766 kg 3,893 lb |
| VolkswagenSharan IIFacelift 20152.0 TDI | 1,725 kg 3,803 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordS-MAX II2.0 TDCi | 218 km/h 135 mph |
| VolkswagenSharan IIFacelift 20152.0 TDI | 215 km/h 134 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordS-MAX II2.0 TDCi | 8.8 s |
| VolkswagenSharan IIFacelift 20152.0 TDI | 8.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Ford S-MAX II 2.0 TDCi and Volkswagen Sharan II Facelift 2015 2.0 TDI: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordS-MAX II2.0 TDCi | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenSharan IIFacelift 20152.0 TDI | 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordS-MAX II2.0 TDCi | 119 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp |
| VolkswagenSharan IIFacelift 20152.0 TDI | 107 hp/t 80 kW/t 9.4 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordS-MAX II2.0 TDCi | 1,273 km 791 mi |
| VolkswagenSharan IIFacelift 20152.0 TDI | 1,321 km 821 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| FordS-MAX II2.0 TDCi | 210 hp 157 kW | 8.8 s | 218 km/h 135 mph |
| VolkswagenSharan IIFacelift 20152.0 TDI | 184 hp 137 kW | 8.9 s | 215 km/h 134 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FordS-MAX II2.0 TDCi |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolkswagenSharan IIFacelift 20152.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FordS-MAX II2.0 TDCi |
| 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolkswagenSharan IIFacelift 20152.0 TDI |
| 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK | ||||||
Ford S-MAX II 2.0 TDCi is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| FordS-MAX II2.0 TDCi | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK | 8.8 s |
| VolkswagenSharan IIFacelift 20152.0 TDI | 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK | 8.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| FordS-MAX II2.0 TDCi | 119 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenSharan IIFacelift 20152.0 TDI | 107 hp/t 80 kW/t 9.4 kg/hp | 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | FordS-MAX II2.0 TDCi | VolkswagenSharan IIFacelift 20152.0 TDI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 210 hp 157 kW | 184 hp 137 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.8 s | 8.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 218 km/h 135 mph | 215 km/h 134 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,766 kg 3,893 lb | 1,725 kg 3,803 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK | 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,273 km 791 mi | 1,321 km 821 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 144 g/km | 139 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 700 L 24.7 cu ft | 300 L 10.6 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 119 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp | 107 hp/t 80 kW/t 9.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Ford S-MAX II 2.0 TDCi | Volkswagen Sharan II Facelift 2015 2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.5 L/100 km42.8 mpg US51.4 mpg UK | 5.3 L/100 km44.4 mpg US53.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 9.63 LC100 km | 9.28 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 15.49 LC100 mi | 14.93 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 825 L218 US gal181 UK gal | 795 L210 US gal175 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,444 LC/year | 1,391 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Ford S-MAX II 2.0 TDCi
- Has 26 hp more
- Has 70 Nm more
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 3 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Has 12 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 400 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Highest CO2 emissions
Volkswagen Sharan II Facelift 2015 2.0 TDI
- Is 41 kg lighter
- Uses 0.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 48 km (30 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 5 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























