Car comparison

Ford S-MAX II 2.0 Bi-Turbo EcobluevsToyota Alphard III · Facelift 2018 3.5 V6

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison
VS

Toyota Alphard III · Facelift 2018

3.5 V6

300 hp3456 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticNaturally aspiratedMinivan / MPV2018-2023

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Ford S-MAX II 2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue

  • Fastest top speed
    218 km/h
    135 mph
  • Highest torque
    500 Nm
    369 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,766 kg
    3,893 lb
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    6.3 L/100 km
    37.3 mpg US
    44.8 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    7.2 L/100 km
    32.7 mpg US
    39.2 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    5.3 L/100 km
    44.4 mpg US
    53.3 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    1,111 km
    690 mi
  • Best overall score
    65/100
  • Best performance score
    51/100
  • Best economy score
    90/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelFordS-MAX II2.0 Bi-Turbo EcoblueToyotaAlphard IIIFacelift 20183.5 V6
Power
240hp179kW
300hp224kW
Torque
500Nm369lb-ft
361Nm266lb-ft
Curb weight
1,766kg3,893lb
2,125kg4,685lb
Gross weight
2,575kg5,677lb
2,675kg5,897lb
Top speed
218 km/h
135 mph
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
95.7s99% target: 216 km/h / 134 mph
Calculated
94.5s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
8.6s
8.3s
0-200 km/h
46.0s
Calculated
56.6s
Calculated
0-60 mph
8.1s
Calculated
7.8s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK
10.5L/100 km22.4mpg US26.9mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK
14.3L/100 km16.4mpg US19.8mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK
8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK
Quarter mile
16.2s
Calculated
16.0s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
136hp/t101kW/t62hp/1000 lb
Calculated
141hp/t105kW/t64hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
283Nm/t189lb-ft/ton
Calculated
170Nm/t114lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,111km690mi
Calculated
619km385mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,997cc122cu in
3,456cc211cu in
Length
4,796mm189in
4,945mm195in
Width
1,916mm75in
1,850mm73in
Height
1,655mm65in
1,945mm77in
Wheelbase
2,849mm112in
3,000mm118in
Front track
1,606mm63in
-
Rear track
1,606mm63in
-
Ground clearance
150mm6in
160mm6in
Trunk volume
700L
-
Max trunk volume
2,200L
-
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
7
Fuel tank
70L
65L
CO2 emissions
162g/km
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Ford S-MAX II 2.0 Bi-Turbo EcoblueToyota Alphard III Facelift 2018 3.5 V6PowerTorque
  • Ford S-MAX II 2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue: Power / Torque
  • Toyota Alphard III Facelift 2018 3.5 V6: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
FordS-MAX II2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue4,000 rpm2,000 rpm4,250 rpm
ToyotaAlphard IIIFacelift 20183.5 V66,600 rpm4,600-4,700 rpm6,850 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricFordS-MAX II2.0 Bi-Turbo EcoblueToyotaAlphard IIIFacelift 20183.5 V6
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
8.1 s
7.8 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
8.6 s
8.3 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
46.0 s
56.6 s
Top speed
218 km/h
135 mph
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.6 s
2.5 s
330 ft
101 m
7.0 s
6.8 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.6 s
10.4 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.7 s
13.4 s
1/4 mile
402 m
16.2 s
16.0 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
141 km/h
88 mph
140 km/h
87 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordS-MAX II2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue
240 hp
179 kW
ToyotaAlphard IIIFacelift 20183.5 V6
300 hp
224 kW

Toyota Alphard III Facelift 2018 3.5 V6 has 60 hp more than Ford S-MAX II 2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue.

The biggest power difference is between Ford S-MAX II 2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue and Toyota Alphard III Facelift 2018 3.5 V6: 60 hp (45 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordS-MAX II2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue
500 Nm
369 lb-ft
ToyotaAlphard IIIFacelift 20183.5 V6
361 Nm
266 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordS-MAX II2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue
1,766 kg
3,893 lb
ToyotaAlphard IIIFacelift 20183.5 V6
2,125 kg
4,685 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordS-MAX II2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue
218 km/h
135 mph
ToyotaAlphard IIIFacelift 20183.5 V6
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Toyota Alphard III Facelift 2018 3.5 V6 and Ford S-MAX II 2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue: 0.3 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordS-MAX II2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue
6.3 L/100 km
37.3 mpg US
44.8 mpg UK
ToyotaAlphard IIIFacelift 20183.5 V6
10.5 L/100 km
22.4 mpg US
26.9 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Ford S-MAX II 2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue and Toyota Alphard III Facelift 2018 3.5 V6: 4.2 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordS-MAX II2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue
136 hp/t
101 kW/t
7.4 kg/hp
ToyotaAlphard IIIFacelift 20183.5 V6
141 hp/t
105 kW/t
7.1 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordS-MAX II2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue
1,111 km
690 mi
ToyotaAlphard IIIFacelift 20183.5 V6
619 km
385 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
FordS-MAX II2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue
240 hp
179 kW
8.6 s
218 km/h
135 mph
ToyotaAlphard IIIFacelift 20183.5 V6
300 hp
224 kW
8.3 s
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
FordS-MAX II2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h8.6 s
Top speed
218 km/h
135 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
700 L
24.7 cu ft
Length
4,796 mm
188.8 in
Height
1,655 mm
65.2 in
ToyotaAlphard IIIFacelift 20183.5 V6
Power
300 hp
224 kW
0-100 km/h8.3 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
7 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,945 mm
194.7 in
Height
1,945 mm
76.6 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
FordS-MAX II2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h8.6 s
Top speed
218 km/h
135 mph
6.3 L/100 km
37.3 mpg US
44.8 mpg UK
ToyotaAlphard IIIFacelift 20183.5 V6
Power
300 hp
224 kW
0-100 km/h8.3 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
10.5 L/100 km
22.4 mpg US
26.9 mpg UK

Ford S-MAX II 2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
FordS-MAX II2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue
6.3 L/100 km
37.3 mpg US
44.8 mpg UK
8.6 s
ToyotaAlphard IIIFacelift 20183.5 V6
10.5 L/100 km
22.4 mpg US
26.9 mpg UK
8.3 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
FordS-MAX II2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue
136 hp/t
101 kW/t
7.4 kg/hp
6.3 L/100 km
37.3 mpg US
44.8 mpg UK
ToyotaAlphard IIIFacelift 20183.5 V6
141 hp/t
105 kW/t
7.1 kg/hp
10.5 L/100 km
22.4 mpg US
26.9 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleFordS-MAX II2.0 Bi-Turbo EcoblueToyotaAlphard IIIFacelift 20183.5 V6
Power
240 hp
179 kW
300 hp
224 kW
Torque
500 Nm
369 lb-ft
361 Nm
266 lb-ft
Acceleration
8.6 s
8.3 s
Top speed
218 km/h
135 mph
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Lightness
1,766 kg
3,893 lb
2,125 kg
4,685 lb
Fuel consumption
6.3 L/100 km
37.3 mpg US
44.8 mpg UK
10.5 L/100 km
22.4 mpg US
26.9 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
700 L
24.7 cu ft
Length
4,796 mm
188.8 in
Height
1,655 mm
65.2 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
7 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,945 mm
194.7 in
Height
1,945 mm
76.6 in
Range score
1,111 km
690 mi
619 km
385 mi
CO2 score
162 g/km
-
Trunk score
700 L
24.7 cu ft
-
Power-to-weight score
136 hp/t
101 kW/t
7.4 kg/hp
141 hp/t
105 kW/t
7.1 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleFord S-MAX II 2.0 Bi-Turbo EcoblueToyota Alphard III Facelift 2018 3.5 V6
Consumption6.3 L/100 km37.3 mpg US44.8 mpg UK10.5 L/100 km22.4 mpg US26.9 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km11.03 LC100 km18.38 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi17.74 LC100 mi29.57 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used945 L250 US gal208 UK gal1,575 L416 US gal346 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,654 LC/year2,756 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Ford S-MAX II 2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue

  • Has 139 Nm more
  • Is 359 kg lighter
  • Has 8 km/h (5 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 4.2 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 492 km (306 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power

Toyota Alphard III Facelift 2018 3.5 V6

  • Has 60 hp more
  • Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 5 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Most powerful
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Ford S-MAX II 2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue
Toyota Alphard III 3.5 V6
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Ford S-MAX II 2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue vs Toyota Alphard III · Facelift 2018 3.5 V6 - car comparison - FastVsFaster