Ford S-MAX II
Car comparison
Ford S-MAX II 2.0 Bi-Turbo EcobluevsToyota Alphard III · Facelift 2018 3.5 V6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonToyota Alphard III · Facelift 2018
3.5 V6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Ford S-MAX II 2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue
- Fastest top speed218 km/h135 mph
- Highest torque500 Nm369 lb-ft
- Lightest1,766 kg3,893 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.3 L/100 km37.3 mpg US44.8 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption7.2 L/100 km32.7 mpg US39.2 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.3 L/100 km44.4 mpg US53.3 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,111 km690 mi
- Best overall score65/100
- Best performance score51/100
- Best economy score90/100
Toyota Alphard III Facelift 2018 3.5 V6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.3 s
- Most powerful300 hp224 kW
- Best power-to-weight141 hp/t105 kW/t7.1 kg/hp
- Best practicality score96/100
Specification comparison
| Model | FordS-MAX II2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue | ToyotaAlphard IIIFacelift 20183.5 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 240hp179kW | 300hp224kW |
| Torque | 500Nm369lb-ft | 361Nm266lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,766kg3,893lb | 2,125kg4,685lb |
| Gross weight | 2,575kg5,677lb | 2,675kg5,897lb |
| Top speed | 218 km/h 135 mph | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 95.7s99% target: 216 km/h / 134 mph Calculated | 94.5s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.6s | 8.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 46.0s Calculated | 56.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 8.1s Calculated | 7.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK | 10.5L/100 km22.4mpg US26.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK | 14.3L/100 km16.4mpg US19.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK | 8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.2s Calculated | 16.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 136hp/t101kW/t62hp/1000 lb Calculated | 141hp/t105kW/t64hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 283Nm/t189lb-ft/ton Calculated | 170Nm/t114lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,111km690mi Calculated | 619km385mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,997cc122cu in | 3,456cc211cu in |
| Length | 4,796mm189in | 4,945mm195in |
| Width | 1,916mm75in | 1,850mm73in |
| Height | 1,655mm65in | 1,945mm77in |
| Wheelbase | 2,849mm112in | 3,000mm118in |
| Front track | 1,606mm63in | - |
| Rear track | 1,606mm63in | - |
| Ground clearance | 150mm6in | 160mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 700L | - |
| Max trunk volume | 2,200L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 7 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 65L |
| CO2 emissions | 162g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Ford S-MAX II 2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue: Power / Torque
- Toyota Alphard III Facelift 2018 3.5 V6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| FordS-MAX II2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue | 4,000 rpm | 2,000 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| ToyotaAlphard IIIFacelift 20183.5 V6 | 6,600 rpm | 4,600-4,700 rpm | 6,850 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | FordS-MAX II2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue | ToyotaAlphard IIIFacelift 20183.5 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.1 s | 7.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.6 s | 8.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 46.0 s | 56.6 s |
| Top speed | 218 km/h 135 mph | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.0 s | 6.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.6 s | 10.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.7 s | 13.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.2 s | 16.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 141 km/h 88 mph | 140 km/h 87 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordS-MAX II2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue | 240 hp 179 kW |
| ToyotaAlphard IIIFacelift 20183.5 V6 | 300 hp 224 kW |
Toyota Alphard III Facelift 2018 3.5 V6 has 60 hp more than Ford S-MAX II 2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue.
The biggest power difference is between Ford S-MAX II 2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue and Toyota Alphard III Facelift 2018 3.5 V6: 60 hp (45 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordS-MAX II2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft |
| ToyotaAlphard IIIFacelift 20183.5 V6 | 361 Nm 266 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordS-MAX II2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue | 1,766 kg 3,893 lb |
| ToyotaAlphard IIIFacelift 20183.5 V6 | 2,125 kg 4,685 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordS-MAX II2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue | 218 km/h 135 mph |
| ToyotaAlphard IIIFacelift 20183.5 V6 | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordS-MAX II2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue | 8.6 s |
| ToyotaAlphard IIIFacelift 20183.5 V6 | 8.3 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Toyota Alphard III Facelift 2018 3.5 V6 and Ford S-MAX II 2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordS-MAX II2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK |
| ToyotaAlphard IIIFacelift 20183.5 V6 | 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Ford S-MAX II 2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue and Toyota Alphard III Facelift 2018 3.5 V6: 4.2 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordS-MAX II2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue | 136 hp/t 101 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp |
| ToyotaAlphard IIIFacelift 20183.5 V6 | 141 hp/t 105 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordS-MAX II2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue | 1,111 km 690 mi |
| ToyotaAlphard IIIFacelift 20183.5 V6 | 619 km 385 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| FordS-MAX II2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue | 240 hp 179 kW | 8.6 s | 218 km/h 135 mph |
| ToyotaAlphard IIIFacelift 20183.5 V6 | 300 hp 224 kW | 8.3 s | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FordS-MAX II2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| ToyotaAlphard IIIFacelift 20183.5 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FordS-MAX II2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue |
| 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| ToyotaAlphard IIIFacelift 20183.5 V6 |
| 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK | ||||||
Ford S-MAX II 2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| FordS-MAX II2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK | 8.6 s |
| ToyotaAlphard IIIFacelift 20183.5 V6 | 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK | 8.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| FordS-MAX II2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue | 136 hp/t 101 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK |
| ToyotaAlphard IIIFacelift 20183.5 V6 | 141 hp/t 105 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp | 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | FordS-MAX II2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue | ToyotaAlphard IIIFacelift 20183.5 V6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 240 hp 179 kW | 300 hp 224 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft | 361 Nm 266 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.6 s | 8.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 218 km/h 135 mph | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,766 kg 3,893 lb | 2,125 kg 4,685 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK | 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,111 km 690 mi | 619 km 385 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 162 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 700 L 24.7 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 136 hp/t 101 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp | 141 hp/t 105 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Ford S-MAX II 2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue | Toyota Alphard III Facelift 2018 3.5 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.3 L/100 km37.3 mpg US44.8 mpg UK | 10.5 L/100 km22.4 mpg US26.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.03 LC100 km | 18.38 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 17.74 LC100 mi | 29.57 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 945 L250 US gal208 UK gal | 1,575 L416 US gal346 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,654 LC/year | 2,756 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Ford S-MAX II 2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue
- Has 139 Nm more
- Is 359 kg lighter
- Has 8 km/h (5 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 4.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 492 km (306 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
Toyota Alphard III Facelift 2018 3.5 V6
- Has 60 hp more
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 5 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























