Maserati GranTurismo II · Facelift 2026
Car comparison
Maserati GranTurismo II · Facelift 2026 3.0 V6vsFord Mustang VII Dark Horse 5.0 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonFord Mustang VII
Dark Horse 5.0 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Maserati GranTurismo II Facelift 2026 3.0 V6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.9 s
- Fastest top speed302 km/h188 mph
- Most powerful490 hp365 kW
- Highest torque600 Nm443 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight265 hp/t198 kW/t3.8 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption10.3 L/100 km22.8 mpg US27.4 mpg UK
- Best overall score75/100
- Best performance score87/100
- Best economy score79/100
Ford Mustang VII Dark Horse 5.0 V8
- Lightest1,762 kg3,885 lb
- Largest trunk381 L
- Best practicality score51/100
Specification comparison
| Model | MaseratiGranTurismo IIFacelift 20263.0 V6 | FordMustang VIIDark Horse 5.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 490hp365kW | 453hp338kW |
| Torque | 600Nm443lb-ft | 540Nm398lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,850kg4,079lb | 1,762kg3,885lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,170kg4,784lb |
| Top speed | 302 km/h 188 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 60.4s99% target: 299 km/h / 186 mph Calculated | 57.6s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.9s | 4.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 11.9s Calculated | 15.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.7s Calculated | 4.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 10.3L/100 km22.8mpg US27.4mpg UK | 12L/100 km19.6mpg US23.5mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 11.8s Calculated | 12.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 265hp/t198kW/t120hp/1000 lb Calculated | 257hp/t192kW/t117hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 324Nm/t217lb-ft/ton Calculated | 306Nm/t205lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 680km422mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 2,992cc183cu in | 5,038cc307cu in |
| Length | 4,969mm196in | 4,819mm190in |
| Width | 1,957mm77in | 1,917mm75in |
| Height | 1,358mm53in | 1,403mm55in |
| Wheelbase | 2,929mm115in | 2,719mm107in |
| Front track | 1,659mm65in | 1,595mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,670mm66in | 1,643mm65in |
| Trunk volume | 310L | 381L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Maserati GranTurismo II Facelift 2026 3.0 V6: Power / Torque
- Ford Mustang VII Dark Horse 5.0 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MaseratiGranTurismo IIFacelift 20263.0 V6 | 6,500 rpm | 2,500-5,500 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| FordMustang VIIDark Horse 5.0 V8 | 7,250 rpm | 5,100 rpm | 7,500 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | MaseratiGranTurismo IIFacelift 20263.0 V6 | FordMustang VIIDark Horse 5.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.7 s | 4.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.9 s | 4.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 11.9 s | 15.1 s |
| Top speed | 302 km/h 188 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.0 s | 2.1 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.2 s | 5.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.7 s | 8.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 9.9 s | 10.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 11.8 s | 12.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 199 km/h 124 mph | 184 km/h 115 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiGranTurismo IIFacelift 20263.0 V6 | 490 hp 365 kW |
| FordMustang VIIDark Horse 5.0 V8 | 453 hp 338 kW |
Maserati GranTurismo II Facelift 2026 3.0 V6 has 37 hp more than Ford Mustang VII Dark Horse 5.0 V8.
The biggest power difference is between Ford Mustang VII Dark Horse 5.0 V8 and Maserati GranTurismo II Facelift 2026 3.0 V6: 37 hp (28 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiGranTurismo IIFacelift 20263.0 V6 | 600 Nm 443 lb-ft |
| FordMustang VIIDark Horse 5.0 V8 | 540 Nm 398 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiGranTurismo IIFacelift 20263.0 V6 | 1,850 kg 4,079 lb |
| FordMustang VIIDark Horse 5.0 V8 | 1,762 kg 3,885 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiGranTurismo IIFacelift 20263.0 V6 | 302 km/h 188 mph |
| FordMustang VIIDark Horse 5.0 V8 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiGranTurismo IIFacelift 20263.0 V6 | 3.9 s |
| FordMustang VIIDark Horse 5.0 V8 | 4.4 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Maserati GranTurismo II Facelift 2026 3.0 V6 and Ford Mustang VII Dark Horse 5.0 V8: 0.5 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiGranTurismo IIFacelift 20263.0 V6 | 10.3 L/100 km 22.8 mpg US 27.4 mpg UK |
| FordMustang VIIDark Horse 5.0 V8 | 12.0 L/100 km 19.6 mpg US 23.5 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Maserati GranTurismo II Facelift 2026 3.0 V6 and Ford Mustang VII Dark Horse 5.0 V8: 1.7 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiGranTurismo IIFacelift 20263.0 V6 | 265 hp/t 198 kW/t 3.8 kg/hp |
| FordMustang VIIDark Horse 5.0 V8 | 257 hp/t 192 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MaseratiGranTurismo IIFacelift 20263.0 V6 | 490 hp 365 kW | 3.9 s | 302 km/h 188 mph |
| FordMustang VIIDark Horse 5.0 V8 | 453 hp 338 kW | 4.4 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MaseratiGranTurismo IIFacelift 20263.0 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| FordMustang VIIDark Horse 5.0 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MaseratiGranTurismo IIFacelift 20263.0 V6 |
| 10.3 L/100 km 22.8 mpg US 27.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| FordMustang VIIDark Horse 5.0 V8 |
| 12.0 L/100 km 19.6 mpg US 23.5 mpg UK | ||||||
Maserati GranTurismo II Facelift 2026 3.0 V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| MaseratiGranTurismo IIFacelift 20263.0 V6 | 10.3 L/100 km 22.8 mpg US 27.4 mpg UK | 3.9 s |
| FordMustang VIIDark Horse 5.0 V8 | 12.0 L/100 km 19.6 mpg US 23.5 mpg UK | 4.4 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| MaseratiGranTurismo IIFacelift 20263.0 V6 | 265 hp/t 198 kW/t 3.8 kg/hp | 10.3 L/100 km 22.8 mpg US 27.4 mpg UK |
| FordMustang VIIDark Horse 5.0 V8 | 257 hp/t 192 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp | 12.0 L/100 km 19.6 mpg US 23.5 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | MaseratiGranTurismo IIFacelift 20263.0 V6 | FordMustang VIIDark Horse 5.0 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 490 hp 365 kW | 453 hp 338 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 600 Nm 443 lb-ft | 540 Nm 398 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.9 s | 4.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 302 km/h 188 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,850 kg 4,079 lb | 1,762 kg 3,885 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 10.3 L/100 km 22.8 mpg US 27.4 mpg UK | 12.0 L/100 km 19.6 mpg US 23.5 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 680 km 422 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 310 L 10.9 cu ft | 381 L 13.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 265 hp/t 198 kW/t 3.8 kg/hp | 257 hp/t 192 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Maserati GranTurismo II Facelift 2026 3.0 V6 | Ford Mustang VII Dark Horse 5.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 10.3 L/100 km22.8 mpg US27.4 mpg UK | 12 L/100 km19.6 mpg US23.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 18.03 LC100 km | 21.00 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 29.01 LC100 mi | 33.80 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,545 L408 US gal340 UK gal | 1,800 L476 US gal396 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,704 LC/year | 3,150 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Maserati GranTurismo II Facelift 2026 3.0 V6
- Has 37 hp more
- Has 60 Nm more
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 37 km/h (23 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.7 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 8 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Ford Mustang VII Dark Horse 5.0 V8
- Is 88 kg lighter
- Has 71 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Lightest
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























