Porsche 911 Cabriolet (992)
Car comparison
Porsche 911 Cabriolet (992) Carrera 4S 3.0vsFord Mustang VII Convertible GT 5.0 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonFord Mustang VII Convertible
GT 5.0 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Porsche 911 Cabriolet (992) Carrera 4S 3.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.6 s
- Fastest top speed304 km/h189 mph
- Most powerful450 hp336 kW
- Lightest1,635 kg3,605 lb
- Best power-to-weight275 hp/t205 kW/t3.6 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption9.0 L/100 km26.1 mpg US31.4 mpg UK
- Best overall score70/100
- Best performance score85/100
- Best economy score83/100
Ford Mustang VII Convertible GT 5.0 V8
- Highest torque540 Nm398 lb-ft
- Largest trunk310 L
- Best practicality score46/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Porsche911 Cabriolet (992)Carrera 4S 3.0 | FordMustang VII ConvertibleGT 5.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 450hp336kW | 446hp333kW |
| Torque | 530Nm391lb-ft | 540Nm398lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,635kg3,605lb | 1,801kg3,971lb |
| Gross weight | 2,065kg4,553lb | - |
| Top speed | 304 km/h 189 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 52.7s99% target: 301 km/h / 187 mph Calculated | 65.7s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.6s | 5.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 10.7s Calculated | 17.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.4s Calculated | 4.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9L/100 km26.1mpg US31.4mpg UK | 12L/100 km19.6mpg US23.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 11.1L/100 km21.2mpg US25.4mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 11.4s Calculated | 13.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 275hp/t205kW/t125hp/1000 lb Calculated | 248hp/t185kW/t112hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 324Nm/t217lb-ft/ton Calculated | 300Nm/t201lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 744km463mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 2,981cc182cu in | 5,038cc307cu in |
| Length | 4,519mm178in | 4,810mm189in |
| Width | 1,852mm73in | 1,916mm75in |
| Height | 1,299mm51in | 1,408mm55in |
| Wheelbase | 2,450mm96in | 2,719mm107in |
| Front track | 1,589mm63in | 1,585mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,557mm61in | 1,642mm65in |
| Trunk volume | 132L | 310L |
| Max trunk volume | 163L | - |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 67L | - |
| CO2 emissions | 207g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Porsche 911 Cabriolet (992) Carrera 4S 3.0: Power / Torque
- Ford Mustang VII Convertible GT 5.0 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 Cabriolet (992)Carrera 4S 3.0 | 6,500 rpm | 2,300-5,000 rpm | 7,500 rpm |
| FordMustang VII ConvertibleGT 5.0 V8 | 7,250 rpm | 5,100 rpm | 7,500 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Porsche911 Cabriolet (992)Carrera 4S 3.0 | FordMustang VII ConvertibleGT 5.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.4 s | 4.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.6 s | 5.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 10.7 s | 17.7 s |
| Top speed | 304 km/h 189 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 1.9 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.0 s | 5.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.5 s | 8.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 9.6 s | 11.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 11.4 s | 13.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 207 km/h 128 mph | 176 km/h 109 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 Cabriolet (992)Carrera 4S 3.0 | 450 hp 336 kW |
| FordMustang VII ConvertibleGT 5.0 V8 | 446 hp 333 kW |
Porsche 911 Cabriolet (992) Carrera 4S 3.0 has 4 hp more than Ford Mustang VII Convertible GT 5.0 V8.
The biggest power difference is between Ford Mustang VII Convertible GT 5.0 V8 and Porsche 911 Cabriolet (992) Carrera 4S 3.0: 4 hp (3 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 Cabriolet (992)Carrera 4S 3.0 | 530 Nm 391 lb-ft |
| FordMustang VII ConvertibleGT 5.0 V8 | 540 Nm 398 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 Cabriolet (992)Carrera 4S 3.0 | 1,635 kg 3,605 lb |
| FordMustang VII ConvertibleGT 5.0 V8 | 1,801 kg 3,971 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 Cabriolet (992)Carrera 4S 3.0 | 304 km/h 189 mph |
| FordMustang VII ConvertibleGT 5.0 V8 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 Cabriolet (992)Carrera 4S 3.0 | 3.6 s |
| FordMustang VII ConvertibleGT 5.0 V8 | 5.0 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Porsche 911 Cabriolet (992) Carrera 4S 3.0 and Ford Mustang VII Convertible GT 5.0 V8: 1.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 Cabriolet (992)Carrera 4S 3.0 | 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK |
| FordMustang VII ConvertibleGT 5.0 V8 | 12.0 L/100 km 19.6 mpg US 23.5 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Porsche 911 Cabriolet (992) Carrera 4S 3.0 and Ford Mustang VII Convertible GT 5.0 V8: 3.0 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 Cabriolet (992)Carrera 4S 3.0 | 275 hp/t 205 kW/t 3.6 kg/hp |
| FordMustang VII ConvertibleGT 5.0 V8 | 248 hp/t 185 kW/t 4.0 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 Cabriolet (992)Carrera 4S 3.0 | 450 hp 336 kW | 3.6 s | 304 km/h 189 mph |
| FordMustang VII ConvertibleGT 5.0 V8 | 446 hp 333 kW | 5.0 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 Cabriolet (992)Carrera 4S 3.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| FordMustang VII ConvertibleGT 5.0 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 Cabriolet (992)Carrera 4S 3.0 |
| 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| FordMustang VII ConvertibleGT 5.0 V8 |
| 12.0 L/100 km 19.6 mpg US 23.5 mpg UK | ||||||
Porsche 911 Cabriolet (992) Carrera 4S 3.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 Cabriolet (992)Carrera 4S 3.0 | 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK | 3.6 s |
| FordMustang VII ConvertibleGT 5.0 V8 | 12.0 L/100 km 19.6 mpg US 23.5 mpg UK | 5.0 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 Cabriolet (992)Carrera 4S 3.0 | 275 hp/t 205 kW/t 3.6 kg/hp | 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK |
| FordMustang VII ConvertibleGT 5.0 V8 | 248 hp/t 185 kW/t 4.0 kg/hp | 12.0 L/100 km 19.6 mpg US 23.5 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Porsche911 Cabriolet (992)Carrera 4S 3.0 | FordMustang VII ConvertibleGT 5.0 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 450 hp 336 kW | 446 hp 333 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 530 Nm 391 lb-ft | 540 Nm 398 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.6 s | 5.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 304 km/h 189 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,635 kg 3,605 lb | 1,801 kg 3,971 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK | 12.0 L/100 km 19.6 mpg US 23.5 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 744 km 463 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 207 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 132 L 4.7 cu ft | 310 L 10.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 275 hp/t 205 kW/t 3.6 kg/hp | 248 hp/t 185 kW/t 4.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Porsche 911 Cabriolet (992) Carrera 4S 3.0 | Ford Mustang VII Convertible GT 5.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9 L/100 km26.1 mpg US31.4 mpg UK | 12 L/100 km19.6 mpg US23.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 15.75 LC100 km | 21.00 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 25.35 LC100 mi | 33.80 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,350 L357 US gal297 UK gal | 1,800 L476 US gal396 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,363 LC/year | 3,150 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Porsche 911 Cabriolet (992) Carrera 4S 3.0
- Has 4 hp more
- Is 166 kg lighter
- Is 1.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 44 km/h (27 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 3.0 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 28 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Smallest trunk
Ford Mustang VII Convertible GT 5.0 V8
- Has 10 Nm more
- Has 178 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























